At the height of the PSYOP-19 scamdemic, the powers that be were absolutely terrified of any lifesaving compounds that could cure their gain-of-function virus, so the war on Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin started to rage.
The Intelligence-Industrial Complex and their various partners-in-crime such as BigPharma, the MSM Mockingbird quislings, and the wholly captured academic peer-reviewed journals were activated to disseminate their disinformation campaigns and publish their fraudulent scientific papers; for example:
In other words, what we witnessed was mass deceit and crimes against humanity, because these NWO globopedo assets always knew that these lifesaving compounds not only cure all viral infections, but they also cure cancer, and not just the turbo cancer variety caused by these very Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccines” that they were only able to push through because they falsely maligned Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin — and then their FDA coconspirators were ordered to approve the criminal “emergency” use authorization (EUA), which then kicked off the severe adverse events VAIDS epidemic we are now living through.
But there is much hope, and at the end of this article an important lifesaving protocol will be shared.
Early January of 2024, Americans learned about the publication of an article from Elsevier’s Journal of Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy overseen by Dr. Danyelle Townsend, a professor at the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy’s Department of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences. As Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Townsend reviewed, approved, and published the article titled: “Deaths induced by compassionate use of hydroxychloroquine during the first COVID-19 wave: An estimate.”
The article was always a hypothesized estimate of people that might have died, but now even that estimate has been retracted. The reason for the retraction was that the Belgian dataset that was one of the bases for the piece was found to be “unreliable” (but in reality was fraudulent). The article also repeatedly referenced the New England Journal of Medicine’s 2020 RECOVERY trial. The RECOVERY trial is well known to be a deeply flawed study which, in addition to implementing late treatment in severely ill Covid patients, used extremely high doses of HCQ.
The now retracted publication authors were all French or Canadian, with the primary author a pharmacist by the name of Alexiane Pradelle. According to a rudimentary internet search, Dr. Pradelle had never published before. Subsequently, listed authors were degreed as physicians, pharmacists, and/or professors of their respective disciplines. The main, corresponding author, Jean-Christophe Lega, runs the Evaluation and Modeling of Therapeutic Effects team at the University of Lyon.
Hydroxychloroquine’s Fabled Safety History Contrasts Data
In addition to being a hypothesized estimate, the article also attacked the legendary safety of HCQ, contradicting centuries of the safety of quinolines as a class.
HCQ, chloroquine and quinine are structurally and pharmaceutically/mechanistically related, sharing the same quinoline structural group. The original iteration of quinine was a very fortunate discovery that dates back to the 1600s (at least) as a medicinal tipple used by Jesuit missionaries in South America. It is naturally found in the bark of the Cinchona tree (also called a “Quina-Quina” tree).
Quinine is still available today both as a prescription drug, for similar indications as HCQ including malaria…and as a Covid-19 treatment.
Quinine is so safe that it may be unique in that the FDA simultaneously permits its use without a prescription, as an ingredient in tonic waters.
HCQ is similarly safe when used appropriately and under medical supervision.
The CDC describes HCQ as “a relatively well tolerated medicine” and that “HCQ can be prescribed to adults and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers” referring to its long-term use in chronic diseases.
Basic logic dictates that, if a drug is safe for long-term use, it would also be safe for short-term use, including (and especially) in Covid-19 early treatment/pre-exposure prophylaxis type indications.
These are pharmacology fundamentals that ought to be known by any pharmacist or physician – let alone to a professor serving as a Journal Editor-in-Chief at a taxpayer-funded state College of Pharmacy.
Did not even one person on her editorial board of over 50 “peer-reviewers” and staff ponder the celebrated and storied history of HCQ (and its predecessors) and how incongruent this study’s findings were before choosing to publish data denigrating HCQ safety?
The correct answer to that might actually be: “no”…
The publishing editorial board all seem to be laboratory bench (non-clinical) research scientists, per their biographies. Although the board does promote itself as meeting DEI requirements of being “gender diverse,” a more important question might be is if they have the appropriate credentials and experience to review and opine on clinically complex drug safety/epidemiology subject matters in the first place.
Is just anyone now allowed to opine on specialty clinical pharmacology drug safety matters?
In certain journals/news publications, the answer to that question seems to be: “yes”…
Those “17,000 Deaths” Never Occurred
Another point of confusion surrounded the interpretation and promotion of this little-known publication by the lay press.
To be exact: there were never “17,000 deaths;” it was always a hypothetical extrapolation of people that could have died, based on “unreliable” (eg, actually, fraudulent) databases on top of the previously mentioned, problematic late-stage RECOVERY-trial-type dosing and timing.
Still, Josh Cohen, a Forbes.com PhD senior healthcare columnist, used this publication to headline an absurdly biased op-ed against HCQ, stating that Trump’s HCQ proposal was “Linked To 17,000 Deaths.” Forbes’ Tufts, Harvard, and the University of Pennsylvania- trained “healthcare analyst” misrepresented or appeared to not understand the now-retracted study methodology or projections.
It went downhill from there. Mere hours following the publication, very similar, now objectively inaccurate, highly politicized, and seemingly coordinated attacks on HCQ and Trump were published by: The Hill, Politico, Frontline News, Scripps News, the Guardian, KFF Health News, News Nation, Newsweek, AOL.com, Yahoo News, and Daily Kos, in addition to a multitude of prominent regional, international, and US federal news outlets, many falsely estimating that 17,000 deaths had already taken place and that the (imaginary) victims’ blood was already on Donald Trump’s hands.
As of September 15, 2024, the above and other articles still show up very prominently (on the first page) of a Google search for “hydroxychloroquine deaths”…which never happened.
Here are some screenshots of headlines referencing non-existent deaths based on a now-retracted study:
Journal Editors Were Immediately Warned about Questionable Findings
Almost immediately following the January 2, 2024 publication, its critical flaws including basic miscalculations among many other deficiencies were brought to the attention of Dr. Townsend by Xavier Azalbert and non-profit BonSens.org attorneys starting on Jan 7, 2024. In fact, a total of 9 communications were sent by the above individuals, but none of them were ever shared as “Letters to The Editor” by Dr. Townsend in good faith to inform readers of specific potential shortcomings, as is otherwise commonly done.
Dr. Townsend seemed to forget that bad medical data and publications can do actual patient harm, and kept legitimate and important study criticisms to herself. Instead of taking responsibility and making a leadership decision, she passed the buck to a Committee on Publication Ethics, delaying the needed retraction.
It appallingly took 234 days (~7 months, from the January 2nd publication to August 26th) for Dr. Townsend’s Journal of Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy to finally retract the “unreliable” article. But at that point, untold millions around the world had already been (and continue to be) polluted with outrageously incorrect information about non-existent HCQ deaths.
This raises some questions about Dr. Townsend’s duties and responsibilities as the Editor in Chief:
What efforts were made to correct incorrect headlines and articles published by the lay press, incorrectly frightening patients, pharmacists, and physicians, by fueling false tropes about HCQ?
What efforts were made to let news organizations know that data from the peer-reviewed publication was under question? (She refers to “a number of Letters to the Editor and correspondence from readers.”)
What immediate efforts are being made to notify news organizations and/or amplify search engine results regarding the now-retracted publication?
What funding source/individual paid the $3,490 (“excluding taxes and fees”) publication fee? (Note: reputable academic journals do not charge to publish articles.)
Does Elsevier’s Journal of Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy meet certain definitions of what is known as a predatory publisher?
Was this Editorial Board qualified to review regulatory/drug safety/epidemiology/any other clinical subjects?
Are the ramifications of this Journal’s publication and its subsequent retraction known to the University of South Carolina administration, co-faculty, and whichever body adjudicates its faculty Code of Ethics & Standards of Practice?
This isn’t the first time Townsend has needed to retract articles – a normally very rare occurrence for reputable journals. Will Elsevier, which publishes over 2,700 journals, permit further opining or publishing on clinical subjects by this editorial board? Can the Editor-in-Chief and/or editorial board be trusted to recuse themselves from opining on any topics that are not within their area of expertise?
What should be done to prevent a reoccurrence of this incident at the University of South Carolina and other taxpayer-funded institutions?
Beyond that, what ramifications/punishments (if any) will occur for other prominent Covid-19 Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine authors/publishers whose articles were also retracted after they were found to be based on so-called “unreliable” (eg, non-existent) databases?
Ethical scientists who believe in truth, transparency, and academic accountability are standing by, waiting for medical and academic justice.
Unethical scientists are also watching this situation unfold, twisting their mustaches, learning about what they could potentially one day get away with.
DISCLAIMER: This article is not medical advice. Do NOT start or discontinue ANY drug without first discussing it with a pharmacist or physician you know and trust.
Is it any wonder then that just like Ivermectin always cured Covid-19 while also possessing potent anti-cancer properties…
Ivermectin May Defeat Cancer and Other Common Chronic Diseases of Aging
This Substack recently wrote about the powerful anticancer properties of Fenbendazole:
…so too does Hydroxychloroquine…
HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE Has Potent ANTI-CANCER Mechanisms
This Substack recently published an article on the many health benefits of Hydroxychloroquine…
…and if Orange Man Bad says a compound like Hydroxychloroquine may save lives — admitting that he was administering this truly safe and effective drug on himself as prophylaxis — then of course it must be anything but true…
…except that Trump and the real experts were all correct, but then Operation Warp Speed could never have been justified, and the deadly gene altering PSYOP-19 “vaccines” could have never been approved, and the crimes against humanity could have never been perpetrated on such a mass scale, and the mandates and “vaccine” passports could have never been instituted, and there would have never been the resultant turbo cancer epidemic to speak of.
Which brings us to the most comprehensive ‘holy grail’ cancer cure and prophylaxis in plain sight, that may also treat Alzheimer’s, mood disorders, Parkinson’s, Lyme Disease, Alpha-Gal Syndrom from Lone Star Disease, myocarditis, Hashimoto’s Disease, shingles (herpes), arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis, diabetes, asthma, leukemia, Lupus, skin conditions, various other “incurable” ailments, “vaccine” shedding, seasonal flu and even the common cold:
The Ultimate Disease Cure & Prophylaxis Protocol
Tocotrienol and Tocopherol forms (all 8) of Vitamin E (400-800mg per day, 7 days a week). A product called Gamma E by Life Extension or Perfect E are both great.
Bio-Available Curcumin (600mg per day, 2 pills per day 7 days a week). A product called Theracurmin HP by Integrative Therapeutics is bioavailable.
Vitamin D (62.5 mcg [2500 IU] seven days a week).
CBD oil (1-2 droppers full [equal to 167 to 334 mg per day] under the tongue, 7 days a week) CBD-X: The most potent full spectrum organic CBD oil, with 5,000 milligrams of activated cannabinoids and hemp compounds CBD, CBN & CBG per serving.
Fenbendazole (450mg, 7 days a week) or in the case of severe turbo cancers up to 1 gram — for MEGADOSE 1,350mg-2,000mg/day — for prophylaxis one 150mg tablet once or twice per week
Ivermectin (24mg, 7 days a week) or in the case of severe turbo cancers up to 1mg/kg/day — for MEGADOSE 120mg-200mg/day — for prophylaxis one 12mg tablet once or twice per week
Hydroxychloroquine (10mg/kg/day 7 days a week) - for prophylaxis one 200mg tablet once or twice per week
Doxycycline (100mg, 7 days a week for 30-60 days)
ImmunX immune support which also greatly increases the bioavailability of both Fenbendazole and Hydroxychloroquine (2 capsules per day) — for prophylaxis 2 capsules per day
Removing sugars and carbohydrates (cancer food) from your diet and replacing table sugar with a zero glycemic index, zero calorie, keto friendly rare sugar like AlluX
Do NOT comply.
⚡️The 50% OFF ChloroquineX Flash Sale⚡️ continues!
This is the biggest sale on this one product ever!
This sale only applies to ChloroquineX.
Please use code HCQ50 for 50% off on Hydroxychloroquine.
⚡️The 50% OFF ChloroquineX Flash Sale⚡️ ends Friday, September 18th (midnight eastern time), 2026.
Upon adding ChloroquineX to your cart, please go to the cart icon at the top right corner of your browser page and click it, then choose the VIEW CART option whereby you will be redirected to a page where you can enter the code HCQ50 in the Use Coupon Code field.
Only the RESOLVX HEALTH website offers all of the authentic products that this Substack promotes.
Please contact the company directly with any product questions: info@resolvx.health
Thanks for going back and showing us pharmacological & medical truths in light of political manipulation of truth and implementation of lies by current Malthusians. They are working hard to reduce the world’s population by creating a “problem” (C-19) by gain of function development then handing us the “solution”, the gene altering, bio weapon, turbo cancer propagating, DARPA, CIA, NWO, WEF, UN-WHO, FrankenFauci & friends, (developed over decades), “warp-speed” C-19 “vaccines”. Having been in the lowest levels of medical & pharmaceutical industry for the better part of 4 decades, something felt “off” to me and I begged my family not to take the shots but support their immune systems instead. Now I have 2 estranged adult children I worry about because one was in the military & was ordered to take them (now disabled with myocarditis & an uncertain future) & the other who took them because it was “the right thing to do”. I hope justice will find those who actively participated in these crimes against humanity. I know that if they escape justice in this life, they cannot escape Justice from the One Who knows everything everyone did & does.
HCQ has been safe for use for whole of Africa for a long time. And it is successful against Covid when used with other anti-viral components. See https://c19early.org/h
During the FDA study, the dose that was used in US hospitals was 2x the maximum dose. Elderly also got too much of the drug in several cases. Which caused bad side-effects. The FDA study was to make sure that this very cheap drug was never used correctly.