UPDATE: fElon Musk: New Globalist Boss Same as Old Globalist Boss
UPDATE: fElon Musk: New Globalist Boss Same as Old Globalist Boss
So much newfound misguided hope will be shattering as it eventually becomes painfully clear to even the most delusional conservative accounts that Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter is just more of the same fraud that defined his entire corporate welfare existence:
While the Twitter censorship czar was fired the other day more for optics to better dupe conservatives and provide them with a false sense of security, Twitter has not missed a beat in its mendacious reality inversion “fact checking” and platform warnings:
All of these so-called “experts” can get fucked along with Musk and his globalist owners.
Conservatives on Twitter celebrated a fact check of the Senile Diaper Soiling Ice Cream Eating Pedo Criminal Puppet “President” for his blatantly dumb low-grade lie:
16 minutes later the world’s richest and busiest fraudster replied:
This is how the new Twitter will function: a seemingly balanced approach to fact checking both political sides, while still serving the very same One World Government in a more nuanced and sophisticated manner; in other words, new Twitter will feel more pro free speech, and the fact checking will come off more egalitarian when it does not really count, but behind the scenes the technocratic agenda remains identical. As such, the biases and ideological shaping remain identical.
Twitter continues to be the Intelligence Industrial Complex’s premier social media propaganda and conditioning node; the behavioral psychologists just stepped up their mass inducement game ahead of more stolen elections, “pandemics” and various other psyops.
Naive conservatives — are there any other kind? — are now becoming ever more emboldened on the platform. It will be that much easier to disappear these “domestic terrorists” as soon as the social credit score app tethered to Neuralink goes live. At least that is the endgame for Musk’s shadowy owners.
Do NOT comply.
Is there any way to get the rich people in charge of things to tell the truth? About anything?? After this whole plandemic fiasco, how did they not figure this out? I'm a whole lot more willing to at least read the introductory paragraph than throw the whole thing in the fireplace, douse it with kerosene, and light it with a flamethrower. I think most of us just don't want to be bullsh!tted anymore!!
The final verdict is not in, yet.
My two personal interactions with Elon's humanity plus general observations in the last few years has been positive and enlightening -- but the problem is that "money" is the common denominator.
No matter how an individual, or group of individuals, other than banksters, acquire substantial amounts of money, one has to use the banking system to "store" monies that have not been used to acquire goods, services, real estate, companies, etc.
Bankers, including central bankers, run by a different set of rules, as they partner with big biz, big pharma, military, big gov, mainstream media and gov to make the aforementioned, "legal".
So, especially, the most benevolent of the rich and super-rich are, unfortunately, beholden to the bankers, whether by forced partnership or more implicate or actual evil threats or actions against altruistic people. Essentially, they are likely put under a lot of pressure to conform to the oligarchs at the top of the totem pole.
A solution is implied by my above answer -- the need to remove and restructure the common denominator. In an economic system based on (Samuelsonian) scarcity, guns or butter, supply/demand curves, etc., one must have a common denominator means of regulating such an economic system -- but, due to robotization of production means, much less reliance on each individual's input and output to the economy, money and the (unnecessary) concept of debt has been used to make wage slaves, welfare slaves and debt slaves of common folk. And altruists and/or benevolent dictators can be easily forced to "knuckle" to those at the top of the totem pole, no matter how well-meaning they are.
But it's not totally hopeless.