Discover more from 2nd Smartest Guy in the World
A History of Eugenics in the United States: Rockefeller Foundation, IBM, Bill Gates Jr & the Subsequent WHO-Sponsored Genocides
In order to better appreciate the global bio-democide program currently underway, this essay will focus on the complex historical eugenics schemes that were subtly and not so subtly deployed in America.
If we are to survive this transhumanist stealth depopulation plan under the guise of lab created “pandemics,” “vaccines,” GMO processed and lab grown foods, and the deliberately released onslaught of environmental toxins, then we must understand precisely how the One World Government technocommunists will be intensifying their Great Reset and 2030 Agenda over the coming months…
The Origins of Eugenics:
Sir Francis Galton, a pioneering figure in eugenics, was greatly inspired by his half-cousin Charles Darwin, and his theory of evolution. Galton's central belief was that both desirable and undesirable traits were inherited, and he proposed that society should encourage the breeding of those with favorable traits and discourage the breeding of those with unfavorable traits. He coined the term "eugenics" to describe this proposed science of "good birth.”
This foundational understanding of eugenics is crucial as it sets the stage for how the movement developed, and the subsequent policies it influenced during the 20th century.
Sir Francis Galton lived from 1822 to 1911.
Early 20th Century Eugenics in the U.S.
Many influential figures believed eugenics could improve society. As it was then, the Industrial Elites actively advocated for eugenics and depopulation.
Andrew Carnegie: His foundation funded the Station for Experimental Evolution and the Eugenics Record Office (ERO), in Cold Spring Harbor in 1913, with active operations until 1939.
Henry Ford: He expressed anti-Semitic views, asserting Jews were behind the "mongrelization" of the white race.
Thomas Edison: Supported eugenics as a tool for improving the human race.
John D. Rockefeller: Staunch supporter of eugenics up until and after World War II. In the 1930s, Rockefeller funded Nazi scientists’ eugenics research used to rationalize the extermination of the Jewish Population in World War II.
Rockefeller initially funded Dr. Rene Sand to organize the WHO after Word War II, who in turn hired Dr. Brock Chisholm as the WHO’s first Director General. Dr. Chisholm was a passionate eugenicist, and depopulation advocate.
This history of the WHO origins was previously touched up in the following article:
Thomas Watson Sr.: The first CEO of IBM and passionate eugenics supporter, used punch card technology for the Eugenics Research Office that recorded data on the US population.
During WW II, Watson Sr. made the data collection technology available to assist the Nazis in organizing extermination of the Jews. The IBM punch card technology was used to organize all records of Jews’ personal details, and greatly streamlined and expedited their roundup.
Eugenics Record Office (ERO)
Founded in Cold Spring Harbor, New York in 1910, and endowed by Andrew Carnegie in 1913, the ERO subsequently became a hub for eugenics research, amassing large amounts of data on US individuals and families. Charles Davenport and Harry Laughlin were two leading figures at the ERO.
Founding Figures: The ERO was founded by Charles B. Davenport, a biologist and early advocate of the American eugenics movement. Davenport secured funding from Mrs. E.H. Harriman, the widow of railroad magnate Edward Harriman, and later from the Carnegie Institution, to establish the ERO in 1913. (Note: the year 1913 was also pivotal in the takeover of the United States, with both the grossly unconstitutional and unratified 16th Amendment being snuck through Congress, as well as the grossly unconstitutional and ruinous Federal Reserve Act; in other words, the peculiar date of the ERO formation is no coincidence.)
Activities: The ERO collected vast amounts of data collection on American families, creating pedigrees that traced the inheritance of physical, mental, and moral traits. This information was used to argue for the inheritance of intelligence, criminality, and other traits in order to support eugenics-based policies.
Research & Publications: The office produced numerous studies, publications, and lectures promoting eugenics theory and practice, popularizing concepts such as the "degenerate" family lineages, exemplified by the infamous (and pseudonymously named) "Jukes" and "Kallikak" families.
Promotion of Sterilization: Harry H. Laughlin, the superintendent of the ERO, was a significant advocate for eugenic sterilizations. He crafted a model sterilization law adopted by many U.S. States. By the 1930s, thousands of forced sterilizations were carried out in the U.S., largely targeting people in prisons, asylums, and other such institutions.
Field Workers: The ERO employed field workers - data collectors - to amass census information from various populations around the country. These workers were often college students trained by the ERO to gather family histories, measure individuals using anthropometric methods, and assess the "fitness" of different families.
Controversies, Criticism and Closure: By the late 1920s and early 1930s, the ERO's research methodologies and conclusions increasingly came under criticism from other scientists for their lack of rigor and overtly racist and classist biases.
Closure: The ERO's funding received from the Carnegie Institution was withdrawn in 1939, leading to ERO's closure. This decision was due in part to a report by a committee led by the geneticist L.C. Dunn, which highlighted the ERO's unscientific methodologies and unsound conclusions. (In many ways the ERO is a precursor to today’s “climate change” to control and ultimately decarbonize, or depopulate large swaths of society under the cover of “science,” more at junk science.)
Legacy: While the ERO was closed in 1939, its influence persisted. The sterilization laws it championed continued to be enforced in several states well into the latter half of the 20th century, and it persists in one State to this very day. The ERO's legacy serves as a cautionary tale about the misuse of science and the consequences of unchallenged pseudoscientific beliefs. It remains a topic of study and reflection in the history of science, bioethics, and the broader history of the United States.
IBM’s involvement with Eugenics Record Office and, subsequently, the Nazi Holocaust
IBM's involvement with eugenics in the U.S. context predates its collaborations with Nazi Germany, and there is evidence that ties the company to other prominent eugenics supporters in the United States, including institutions funded by Carnegie, Rockefeller, and other influential figures.
Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor: Established in 1910 with funding from the Carnegie Institution and later receiving support from the Rockefeller Foundation, the ERO was a central institution in the American eugenics movement.
Charles Davenport and Harry H. Laughlin were key figures at the ERO. IBM, through its punch-card technology, helped the ERO systematize and process vast amounts of data on family lineages, traits, and other information used in eugenics research. This technological aid facilitated the ERO's push for eugenic policies, such as forced sterilizations.
1930s – Census and Sterilization Laws: IBM's punch card technology played a role in the U.S. census of the 1930s which, in turn, was used by States to enforce sterilization laws. By making it easier to categorize and track individuals deemed "unfit," the technology indirectly supported eugenic policies. ERO’s Harry H. Laughlin, provided testimonies and crafted model sterilization laws adopted by many states.
Connection to Prominent Figures: While IBM's collaborations with ERO were largely on an institutional level, these institutions were supported by philanthropic giants such as the Carnegie Institution and the Rockefeller Foundation. The financial ties between these entities are well-documented, even if direct personal collaborations between IBM's top executives and figures such as Carnegie or Rockefeller might not be as explicit.
During the early 20th century, eugenics was a mainstream scientific pursuit, and many institutions, scholars, and businesses were involved, in varying degrees.
IBM's collaboration with the Third Reich during the 1930s and 1940s was pivotal.
Thomas J. Watson, the CEO of IBM during the 1930s, oversaw the company's business dealings with Nazi Germany. IBM, through its German subsidiary, Dehomag, provided the Hollerith punch-card systems that were used in censuses and helped facilitate the Nazis' identification, segregation, and extermination of groups they considered undesirable, including Jews, Roma, and others.
While it is clear that IBM's technology was employed in the service of the Nazis' eugenics and genocidal programs, Watson’s personal support of eugenic beliefs is a more complex matter. Watson did have a relationship with the Nazi regime—he was awarded the Order of the German Eagle by Hitler in 1937, though he returned the medal in 1940 as World War II escalated. IBM's business dealings with Nazi Germany were largely driven by economic interests.
The connection between IBM and the Nazi regime's eugenic practices is explored in great depth in Edwin Black's book, "IBM and the Holocaust."
Eugenics Record Office and Vaccine Passports
Eugenics, despite being discredited as a science, has left an indelible mark on global health policies and practices. Its remnants can be seen in the ethical challenges we face today in public health. Understanding this history is crucial for ensuring informed, ethical, and inclusive global health decisions.
In the US, in a 1976 investigation, the Government Accountability Office found that over 25 percent of Native Americans were forcibly sterilized in the early 1970s. In China, many Chinese geneticists sought to improve population quality. Beginning in the 1990s, some Chinese government officials sought to eliminate those with opposing moral values which tend to be influenced by the Buddhist and Taoist religions.
The ERO, Armed with the early IBM Punch Card Technology, was a Precursor to the Infamous Digital Vaccine Passports during COVID-19
Today’s ultra-sophisticated data collection technology makes it possible for governments to access detailed information on any group of people, or specific individuals. The “vaccine” passport trial balloon during the “pandemic” was a powerful reminder that these dark forces are ready to escalate at a moment’s notice their census-like digital gulag rounding up of large swaths of the population.
Rockefeller Financed Margaret Sanger and the Negro Project: The Genesis of “Planned Parenthood”
In 1921, Margaret Sanger established the American Birth Control League (ABCL).
In 1939, Sanger reorganized ABCL and renamed it the Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA). That same year, Sanger initiated The "Negro Project”. In 1942, the BCFA changed its name to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which is still in operation today — illicitly funded by the illegitimate Federal government — as Planned Parenthood.
The “Negro Project,” ostensibly aimed at introducing "birth control" to the African American community, was in reality a project intended to reduce the Black population. Sanger collaborated with Black leaders, including W.E.B. Du Bois, and deceptively convinced them that birth control could improve the socio-economic conditions of the Black community a la government agents and politicians going to Black churches and pressuring them to take the DEATHVAX™; to wit:
The "Negro Project" was paternalistic and exploitative, aiming to control Black reproduction under the guise of "helping" the Black community. The project targeted Black communities as particularly "unfit," and sought to reduce their numbers.
The following quote from a letter Margaret Sanger wrote in 1939 to Dr. Clarence Gamble, discussing the "Negro Project,” illustrates Sanger’s true intentions:
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
William Gates Sr. and Planned Parenthood
William Gates Sr., the father of Microsoft co-founder, more at Rockefeller Foundation frontman, Bill Gates, served on the board of Planned Parenthood Federation of America during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
The Gates family has been open about their support for "reproductive health" and "family planning causes." Bill Gates Jr. has mentioned in interviews that his father's involvement with Planned Parenthood influenced his and the Gates Foundation's commitment to "reproductive health initiatives globally.”
At $60.1 billion paid out since the year 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the largest in the world. As a private organization, the Foundation is accountable solely to its now two trustees, Bill and Melinda Gates.
“You may have foundations with assets larger than almost 70% of the world's nations making decisions about public policy and public priorities without any public discussion or political process" - Pablo Eisenberg, the Georgetown Public Policy Institute
Because the Gates Foundation allocates enormous amounts of money “earned” via insider trading, tax evasion, money laundering, and other fraud to fund health research, it treats research like a business.
Tim Schwab, who has been investigating the Gates Foundation for years, said that their philanthropy, "feels more like an investment bank than it does a charity. If you look across global health, they're funding everybody," he said. "Nobody is more than one degree removed from the Gates Foundation. If you're a journalist writing about global health, you might end up getting a fellowship or a grant to do reporting that's funded by the Gates Foundation. So it's really hard to overstate how much influence that gives the foundation. Through June 2020 the foundation had given more than $250 million to journalism and outlets such as the BBC, NBC, The Atlantic, and the Center for Investigative Reporting.”
According to The Seattle Times, the Gates foundation is funding the research around journalism, training for journalists, crafting media fact sheets, and even shaping op-eds which have been found in places like The New York Times.
Rockefeller Financed Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
Conducted between 1932 and 1972, the study was a joint venture between the Rockefeller-financed Tuskegee Institute (University) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS), to observe the natural progression of syphilis in untreated African American population. Participants were told they were treated for “bad blood” and would get free medical exams, meals and burial insurance for their participation. Early on, Dr. Eugene Dibble, as a Black American Doctor, was recruited to gain the confidence of his fellow African Americans, who would ultimately become victims in this heinous crime.
Participants were not asked to sign informed consent and, after 1940, when penicillin became available as a treatment for syphilis, the participants were denied the treatment. The only treatment the participants sick with syphilis received, was heavy metals therapy. During the study, forty wives of the participants also contracted syphilis, and 19 children were born with it.
Of course, we saw the same criminal lack of informed consent during the PSYOP-19 slow kill bioweapon “vaccine” campaign.
Creation of The World Health Organization
After World War II, the Rockefeller Crime Syndicate continued to relentlessly push their eugenics depopulation agenda by institutionalizing it globally through the establishment of the World Health Organization.
During the 1945 United Nations Conference on International Organization, Szeming Sze, a delegate from China, conferred with Norwegian and Brazilian delegates on creating an international health organization under the auspices of the newly formed United Nations.
Sze went to the 1945 U.N. conference in San Francisco as an aide to Chinese Foreign Minister T.V. Soong.
During a “medical lunch” that Sze had with Dr. Karl Evang of Norway, and Dr. Geraldo De Paula Souza of Brazil, Evang proposed setting up a new health organization in conjunction with the United Nations.
The men asked Sze to put forth the idea in his role as a member of the Chinese delegation, with China being one of the four nations — Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union and China — that sponsored the conference.
Sze got the approval of Soong, the head of the Chinese delegation, and wrote the declaration to set up an international conference to create the World Health Organization, which the San Francisco meeting adopted.
The constitution of the World Health Organization was signed by all 51 countries of the United Nations, and by 10 other countries, on July 22, 1946.
Its constitution formally came into force on April 7, 1948, when it was ratified by the 26th member state. The first meeting of the World Health Assembly concluded on July 24, 1948, having secured a budget of $5 million dollars, some of which came from the Rockefeller Foundation.
The Rockefeller Foundation played a pivotal role in shaping global health policies and institutions. Before the establishment of WHO, the Rockefeller Foundation was actively involved in international health through its its International Health Division. When WHO was being established, the Rockefeller Foundation provided both technical expertise and financial support; in other words, the WHO was the global breakout of the Rockefeller Foundation’s eugenics program disguised as “public health.”
Prior to the creation of the WHO, Dr. René Sand, a Belgian medical doctor, social worker, and co-founder of the WHO, was chairman of the committee of experts whose aim was to create the WHO. Several of Dr. Sand’s initiatives happened to have been directly funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
Dr. Sand recruited Dr. Brock Chisholm, a Canadian psychiatrist and an outspoken eugenicist, to be the WHO's first Director-General. Before his tenure at the WHO, Dr. Chisholm voiced concerns about overpopulation, and was an ardent proponent of eugenics. During his leadership, "family planning" became part of the WHO's central discussion, paving the way for controversial population control measures.
Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya
WHO's Research on Birth Control using hCG as hidden sterilization component of a Tetanus Vaccine
Background: During the 1970s and 1980s, the World Health Organization sponsored research into creating a birth control vaccine. The idea behind the vaccine was to stimulate the body's immune system to produce antibodies against human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone essential for maintaining pregnancy. By causing the immune system to treat hCG as a foreign invader, it would prevent the hormone from sustaining a pregnancy, thereby acting as a contraceptive.
Development: The vaccine was developed by adding a small amount of hCG to the tetanus toxoid (an exotoxin secreted by bacteria). This process would then cause the recipient's immune system to recognize both the tetanus and the hCG as foreign invaders, producing antibodies against both.
Clinical Trials: The WHO conducted clinical trials in the 1980s and early 1990s to test the efficacy and safety of this contraceptive vaccine. The vaccine was never widely distributed or made commercially available due to concerns about its efficacy and potential side effects.
Tetanus Vaccine Disaster
Beginning of Catastrophe: In the 1990s, allegations arose claiming that tetanus vaccines provided by the WHO in developing countries, notably the Philippines, Mexico, and several African nations, were contaminated with hCG. The claim suggested that the WHO was secretly trying to sterilize women without the women’s knowledge or consent.
Investigations: Multiple investigations were carried out, both by independent organizations and the WHO, and instances were found where hCG was detected in the vaccines.
WHO's Response: The WHO has consistently denied any wrongdoing or intent to sterilize women covertly. The WHO’s implausible explanation that hCG-tetanus toxoid vaccine was distinct from regular tetanus vaccines and was not used outside the context of closely monitored clinical trials, begged the question of how hCG originated in some of the vaccines in the first place.
This controversy led to a deep distrust towards vaccination campaigns in several countries, long before the roll out of the C-19 injections.
The 1990s campaign to vaccinate women against tetanus became a public relations disaster for the WHO when the Catholic Church in Kenya proved that some of the vaccines, specifically those aimed at women of reproductive age, contained hCG. The results were subsequently confirmed by other outside tests.
WHO/Gates India's Polio Vaccination Program 2000-2017
491,000 more cases of non-Polio acute flaccid paralysis.
Neetu Vashisht and Jacob Puliyel, the authors of a research paper on the polio vaccination program in India, noted that between 2000 to 2017, there were 491,000 additional cases of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in India, which they posited as potentially being linked to the oral polio vaccine.
The paper essentially raised concerns about the escalating cases of NPAFP in India, while hypothesizing a potential connection with repeated doses of the oral polio vaccine. The authors observed a directly proportional relationship between the number of oral polio vaccine doses received and the incidence of NPAFP in a region.
2022: Court order to release the Pfizer trial-results of C-19 injections, documents, which the FDA requested the Court to to keep hidden for 75 years, to hide the real purpose of the C-19 injections: Depopulation through Genocide
The Pfizer Documents
After the court order to release the C-19 injections trial results, Pfizer released 55,000 documents per month, with each document containing as many as 10,000 pages.
The documents show Pfizer’s internal experiments leading up to the injection, and what happened to people when they were injected with the mRNA injection.
Three and a half thousand medical and scientific experts from around the world analyzed the documents. Here are their findings so far:
Pfizer knew in November 2020, i.e. one month after rollout of the injection, that the “vaccines” didn’t work to stop COVID. Also at that time, Pfizer identified “vaccine” failure and failure of efficacy. Additionally, they identified that the third most common side effect of the Pfizer “vaccine” is… COVID infection!
Within a month or two after the release of the “vaccine,” Pfizer was getting so many reports of adverse effects in injected people, that they were forced to hire 2,400 staffers to process the flood of the adverse effects reports coming in.
In May of 2021, Pfizer knew that their “vaccines” were causing heart damage in minors at the rate of 35 cases per week. All the Pfizer documents have a note at the bottom stating: “FDA confidential”, so Pfizer shared these documents, and the information on the adverse effects, with the FDA. However, the government of the United States did not disclose to the parents until August of 2021, that there was an elevated risk of heart damage from the injection in healthy children.
The CDC said that the material in the injection stays in the injection site - it does not. The components of the injection are: lipid nanoparticles, mRNA, and Spike Protein. While Pfizer were assuring the population that the injection stays at the injection site, it was well known to Pfizer that, in fact, the components of the injection, all of the components, are distributed throughout the body within 48 hours after the injection. The components do not stay at the site of the injection. Lipid nanoparticles is industrial fat which is covered in polyethylene glycol – a petroleum by-product. They are liquid at super cold temperatures but clot at room temperature and at body temperature. Lipid nanoparticles are designed to cross every membrane of the human organism – this has been known for ten years. So the “vaccine” components go to the brain, they bio-distribute to the liver, the adrenals, the spleen, and in women, the “vaccine” components accumulate in the ovaries. They also, to a lesser extent, accumulate in men’s
testicles. What is particularly horrifying is that there is no known mechanism for the body to clear away these lipid nanoparticles, or cause them externally to be removed from the women’s ovaries.
The Pfizer documents show that in three months after the first injections, there were over 1,200 deaths out of 42,000 adverse events. The side effects consist of catastrophic categories: Strokes, hemorrhages, blood clots – lung clots, leg clots, neurological disorders, dementia-type disorders, Guillain-Barre syndrome, Bell’s Palsy; but the number 1 side effect is joint pain. Another common side effect is myalgia – muscle pain. According to the Pfizer documents, joint and muscle pain occurs in young, otherwise healthy, fit young people after receiving the injection.
These are not the side effects that the CDC or your doctor tells you about. According to the CDC, you may experience some chills, a headache, maybe a little swelling at the injection site, but the Pfizer documents tell a more disturbing story. According to Pfizer, there were 61 deaths, for example, from stroke and half of the stroke adverse events took place within 48 hours of the injection. Five deaths occurred from liver damage and half of the adverse effects of the liver damage occurred within 48 hours of the injection.
Pfizer report #56 refers to children. In early 2021, months before the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) was issued for children to receive the COVID “vaccine,” i.e. before the “vaccine” was legal for children, Pfizer injected 62 children with the COVID “vaccine.” Some of the children were as young as two months old. Of the 62 children, records exist only for 34 children. The records for the remaining 28 children have disappeared; it is not known whether the children are still alive. Of the 34 records remaining, one seven-year old girl sustained a stroke and a two months old baby had a liver damage. At that same time, and before the EUA was passed, 1000 children were experimented on with the COVID “vaccine,” in various medical centers in the US.
The key section of the Pfizer documents is the experiment on human reproduction; specifically, on how to disrupt and impair human reproduction. In this experiment involving the COVID “vaccine,” Pfizer instructed participating women not to get pregnant – a curious instruction considering that COVID is a respiratory disease. Despite these instructions, 270 of the participating women got pregnant. Out of the 270 pregnant women, Pfizer “lost” the records of 234 women. Of the 36 pregnant women whose records are available, over 80 % lost their babies due to miscarriage. In other words, one of the numerous bioweapon payloads of Pfizer’s “vaccine” was sterilization.
Is shedding real? Yes, shedding is real. The Pfizer documents define exposure to the “vaccine” as: skin contact, inhalation, and sexual intercourse. The lipid nanoparticles traverse the woman’s placenta, invade the placental fluid and every cell of the placenta environment and the fetus. Dr. David Thorpe, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, found in his vaccinated patients that the placenta has formed a network of calcifications caused by the “vaccine” lipid nanoparticles. The compromised or impaired placentas in these women resulted in pre-mature deliveries of the babies. Dr. Thorpe also observed chromosomal abnormalities in these newborns of vaccinated mothers.
The Pfizer documents also reveal that lipid nanoparticles enter breast milk. Four of the moms in the study produced breast milk that turned blue-green. Subsequent to the Pfizer study, the NIH conducted another study which also showed that babies nursed by vaccinated moms were having failure to thrive and to putt on weight, the babies were agitated, restless and sleepless.
In the documents, Dr. Chandler found that of the adverse events, 72% were sustained by women and this a constant 3:1 ratio of women to men. This is not to say that men are not harmed, they are, but women are harmed in disproportionately greater numbers. Of the 72%, Pfizer found that 16% were reproductive disorders. The number for men was 0.49%. In 2022, nine months after the rollout of the “vaccine” in Western Europe and North America, there is a 13 to 20 % drop in live births. The sub-data show double the number of still births in Scotland, 89 still births in one Canadian Province, where the usual number is 2 or 3 still births for the same time period.
Amy Kelly found that lipid nanoparticles degrade baby boys in utero. Lipid nanoparticles travers the testicular membrane of the boys’ Sertoli cells (necessary for sperm production in males) and Leydig cells (primary source of testosterone or androgens in males). It is not yet known if these baby boys of vaccinated moms will be able to grow up to be reproductively functioning adult men.
Considering the fact that COVID is a respiratory infection, the question remains why did Pfizer conduct COVID vaccine experiments on rats focusing specifically on the reproductive organs of the rats. The answer is clear: Pfizer was searching for a vaccine designed specifically to disrupt human reproduction. The vaccine is a manufactured bio weapon.
Pfizer partnered with BioNTech to create the COVID “vaccine.” According to the SEC filings. in 2021 there was a 100% IP transfer from BioNTech to China. China then opened manufacturing facilities for these vaccines in Europe, the US (and in China, only for export).
The COVID 19 “vaccines” do not prevent transmission, and do not cure the disease. So why was the global population forced to be injected? The answer is clear: it is to cripple our society; to commence with their asymmetric biowarfare, which is to degrade, sterilize, slow kill, and demoralize global populations.
This is precisely why all truly safe and truly effective treatments were maligned and withheld during the “pandemic” in order to maximum the death and destruction. Now that the “vaccines” are causing unprecedented surges in cardiac and prion-based diseases, turbo cancers, etc. these repurposed treatments are being actively suppressed in order for the slow kill bioweapons to continue to wreak biological havoc in the genetically modified human population. These same adverse events also plague to a lesser degree the “vaccine” refuseniks.
This is why it is so important to use repurposed drugs such as Ivermectin and Fenbendazole not just against the “vaccine” and associated spike protein (SP 2) damage, but also as prophylaxis and treatment against their upcoming followup gain of function Nipah and Marburg “pandemics.”
We may also deduce that these inexpensive repurposed drugs can counteract and reverse the sterilizing effects of the PSYOP-19 “vaccine.”
Do NOT comply.