The politician has a choice. 1) He can admit it now appears there may be some justification for questioning safety of these injections, as his healthy daughter posted, “... I’m fortunate to have been double vaccinated and boosted ... two weeks ago ...” before she never work up from sleep.
The politician has a choice. 1) He can admit it now appears there may be some justification for questioning safety of these injections, as his healthy daughter posted, “... I’m fortunate to have been double vaccinated and boosted ... two weeks ago ...” before she never work up from sleep.
Or 2) He can continue to push the narrative, as if his daughter’s unfortunate death isn’t worth questioning the narrative. If this latter, then this man lacks basic integrity. Let’s see what he does or doesn’t do.
The politician has a choice. 1) He can admit it now appears there may be some justification for questioning safety of these injections, as his healthy daughter posted, “... I’m fortunate to have been double vaccinated and boosted ... two weeks ago ...” before she never work up from sleep.
Or 2) He can continue to push the narrative, as if his daughter’s unfortunate death isn’t worth questioning the narrative. If this latter, then this man lacks basic integrity. Let’s see what he does or doesn’t do.
This is a CHICAGO politician. What do you think he will do?
No, he would have to do much more than admit that there may be some justification for questioning the safety.
He would have to admit that he ignored clear safety signals and gambled away his daughter's life for his political and social gain.
I can guarantee you he will not do that.