Maybe... but so far all we have is proof of changing DNA in liver cells en vitro, right? For greater indication, I would need to see eggs and sperm with those genes... And for definite proof, the passed changes in genes in the DNA of the next generation.
Maybe... but so far all we have is proof of changing DNA in liver cells en vitro, right? For greater indication, I would need to see eggs and sperm with those genes... And for definite proof, the passed changes in genes in the DNA of the next generation.
1)Asymptomatic transmission is not extremely rare but common
2)The injection load only stays in the deltoid muscle
3)"Impossible that the mRNA could be transcribed and integrated iinto the human genome.
4)Sarscov2 untreatable
5) PVR are a good barometer of infectivity
6)masks work
7) Injections (so called "vaccines") are safe and effective
It goes on and on. With 10,000,000+ people murdered not from a virus but from medical malpractice I am inclined to go with the worst case. Especially when the Japanese bio distribution study showed that this concentrates in the ovaries where there is plenty of reverse transcriptase.
You are right … so many lies … and the sheep believed every single one.
But, I must agree with John that this only ELEVATES the need for careful building of evidence before we claim any facts of our own. Acknowledging a “worst fear” is not the same as claiming it has arrived.
No, we cannot “weaken our position” by jumping to wrong conclusions. Truth cannot be weakened or strengthened… it only remains.
Still, we can weaken our own strength by charging after incorrect assumptions!
I am not saying genetic changes won’t reside in the next generation … I fear they will … I am only saying we cannot possibly know for sure at this point and it does not serve us to say otherwise.
Caution and prudence are imperative. If the past two years have taught me anything it is this
The fact that we were told so many lies... does that not inspire us to get it right? If I had to guess, I would guess as you do, but we don't have to guess. Surely researchers will want to test this and report when we know. There are plenty other reasons to avoid the injections. We don't have to combat lies with our own premature assumptions.
Maybe... but so far all we have is proof of changing DNA in liver cells en vitro, right? For greater indication, I would need to see eggs and sperm with those genes... And for definite proof, the passed changes in genes in the DNA of the next generation.
We were told countless lies.
1)Asymptomatic transmission is not extremely rare but common
2)The injection load only stays in the deltoid muscle
3)"Impossible that the mRNA could be transcribed and integrated iinto the human genome.
4)Sarscov2 untreatable
5) PVR are a good barometer of infectivity
6)masks work
7) Injections (so called "vaccines") are safe and effective
It goes on and on. With 10,000,000+ people murdered not from a virus but from medical malpractice I am inclined to go with the worst case. Especially when the Japanese bio distribution study showed that this concentrates in the ovaries where there is plenty of reverse transcriptase.
You are right … so many lies … and the sheep believed every single one.
But, I must agree with John that this only ELEVATES the need for careful building of evidence before we claim any facts of our own. Acknowledging a “worst fear” is not the same as claiming it has arrived.
No, we cannot “weaken our position” by jumping to wrong conclusions. Truth cannot be weakened or strengthened… it only remains.
Still, we can weaken our own strength by charging after incorrect assumptions!
I am not saying genetic changes won’t reside in the next generation … I fear they will … I am only saying we cannot possibly know for sure at this point and it does not serve us to say otherwise.
Caution and prudence are imperative. If the past two years have taught me anything it is this
The fact that we were told so many lies... does that not inspire us to get it right? If I had to guess, I would guess as you do, but we don't have to guess. Surely researchers will want to test this and report when we know. There are plenty other reasons to avoid the injections. We don't have to combat lies with our own premature assumptions.