After watching what Karen Kingston has to say and seeing the patents she presents I think the "spike protein" and the nanotechnology are probably the same thing.
The doctors talking spike protein only won't touch graphene and nanotechnology. Scared to speak of it. Are they simply scared to talk about it? Are they intentionally misleading…
After watching what Karen Kingston has to say and seeing the patents she presents I think the "spike protein" and the nanotechnology are probably the same thing.
The doctors talking spike protein only won't touch graphene and nanotechnology. Scared to speak of it. Are they simply scared to talk about it? Are they intentionally misleading people away from nano tech? Are they just naive to it? I don't know but they won't touch the subject.
Karen said the zinc etc...the spike protein doctors are recommending would probably pull the nanotech inside the cells better. If thats true all this zinc, quercitin, etc...people are taking is aiding nanobot assembly.
This is Karen. She don't play and she knows her stuff.
Not sure. Spike may well be the way they are getting the unjabbed 20% anyways. Erica Kahn rips Karen's research a big one over at rense.com. Karen may unwittingly be helping the final solution by distracting the unjabbed from the one thing they should be worried about. Proximity to spikers.
good points. doubt it though it is unwittingly. they are throwing the kitchen sink at this point is everything from no virus to whatever ... just never spike protein which is a litmus test to tell about someone. interestingly dr. bossche who worked for gates in africa never talks about it, dont think malone does either, although he has some great sundays funnies and horses pictures, plus politics ... right on.
dr. chetty was spot on regarding spike protein from the very start. he had a great ten minutes video on that.
As far as I remember Karen recognizes the spreading and shedding. A lot of people are ripping her and that is to be expected in this arena. Everybody publicly speaking is getting ripped. I'm not familiar with Erica Kahn at all never heard of them but I will look.
"Karen said the zinc etc...the spike protein doctors are recommending would probably pull the nanotech inside the cells better. If thats true all this zinc, quercitin, etc...people are taking is aiding nanobot assembly."
this is certainly a possibility- something I have been pondering the last few days...
I hear you- but I am not sure if that's the way in which this potential proverbial "journey down the rabbit hole" is being utilized...
For arguments sake, I'll accept the spike as hazard, but apparently it has not been found in sampled vials- which doesn't necessarily negate it's "existence" ( and I'm sure you would argue that it's been found in autopsied corpses-I would have to look at the science more closely on how the spike found is qualified/quantified in these cases to comment)
the way I see it, these narratives complement the "jab is bad" narrative and in no way preclude recognition of harm or a call for justice
& the tech exists... (at least on paper)
Anything and everything could be in these shots- the "manufacturers" told us it was a modified spike- any reason to believe them? or does the idea of spike malfunction confer plausible deniability...?
(btw-I vote for intent to do harm, just not sure of the agent(s)...
After watching what Karen Kingston has to say and seeing the patents she presents I think the "spike protein" and the nanotechnology are probably the same thing.
The doctors talking spike protein only won't touch graphene and nanotechnology. Scared to speak of it. Are they simply scared to talk about it? Are they intentionally misleading people away from nano tech? Are they just naive to it? I don't know but they won't touch the subject.
Karen said the zinc etc...the spike protein doctors are recommending would probably pull the nanotech inside the cells better. If thats true all this zinc, quercitin, etc...people are taking is aiding nanobot assembly.
This is Karen. She don't play and she knows her stuff.
https://www.brighteon.com/dc40f749-38ad-4a4d-8702-9c75a7b87afb
Not sure. Spike may well be the way they are getting the unjabbed 20% anyways. Erica Kahn rips Karen's research a big one over at rense.com. Karen may unwittingly be helping the final solution by distracting the unjabbed from the one thing they should be worried about. Proximity to spikers.
good points. doubt it though it is unwittingly. they are throwing the kitchen sink at this point is everything from no virus to whatever ... just never spike protein which is a litmus test to tell about someone. interestingly dr. bossche who worked for gates in africa never talks about it, dont think malone does either, although he has some great sundays funnies and horses pictures, plus politics ... right on.
dr. chetty was spot on regarding spike protein from the very start. he had a great ten minutes video on that.
As far as I remember Karen recognizes the spreading and shedding. A lot of people are ripping her and that is to be expected in this arena. Everybody publicly speaking is getting ripped. I'm not familiar with Erica Kahn at all never heard of them but I will look.
"Karen said the zinc etc...the spike protein doctors are recommending would probably pull the nanotech inside the cells better. If thats true all this zinc, quercitin, etc...people are taking is aiding nanobot assembly."
this is certainly a possibility- something I have been pondering the last few days...
Honesty, this all appears as an effort to get focus OFF the spike which is a proven and pervasive killer
I hear you- but I am not sure if that's the way in which this potential proverbial "journey down the rabbit hole" is being utilized...
For arguments sake, I'll accept the spike as hazard, but apparently it has not been found in sampled vials- which doesn't necessarily negate it's "existence" ( and I'm sure you would argue that it's been found in autopsied corpses-I would have to look at the science more closely on how the spike found is qualified/quantified in these cases to comment)
the way I see it, these narratives complement the "jab is bad" narrative and in no way preclude recognition of harm or a call for justice
& the tech exists... (at least on paper)
Anything and everything could be in these shots- the "manufacturers" told us it was a modified spike- any reason to believe them? or does the idea of spike malfunction confer plausible deniability...?
(btw-I vote for intent to do harm, just not sure of the agent(s)...