I hear you- but I am not sure if that's the way in which this potential proverbial "journey down the rabbit hole" is being utilized...
For arguments sake, I'll accept the spike as hazard, but apparently it has not been found in sampled vials- which doesn't necessarily negate it's "existence" ( and I'm sure you would argue that it's been found in autopsied corpses-I would have to look at the science more closely on how the spike found is qualified/quantified in these cases to comment)
the way I see it, these narratives complement the "jab is bad" narrative and in no way preclude recognition of harm or a call for justice
& the tech exists... (at least on paper)
Anything and everything could be in these shots- the "manufacturers" told us it was a modified spike- any reason to believe them? or does the idea of spike malfunction confer plausible deniability...?
(btw-I vote for intent to do harm, just not sure of the agent(s)...
Honesty, this all appears as an effort to get focus OFF the spike which is a proven and pervasive killer
I hear you- but I am not sure if that's the way in which this potential proverbial "journey down the rabbit hole" is being utilized...
For arguments sake, I'll accept the spike as hazard, but apparently it has not been found in sampled vials- which doesn't necessarily negate it's "existence" ( and I'm sure you would argue that it's been found in autopsied corpses-I would have to look at the science more closely on how the spike found is qualified/quantified in these cases to comment)
the way I see it, these narratives complement the "jab is bad" narrative and in no way preclude recognition of harm or a call for justice
& the tech exists... (at least on paper)
Anything and everything could be in these shots- the "manufacturers" told us it was a modified spike- any reason to believe them? or does the idea of spike malfunction confer plausible deniability...?
(btw-I vote for intent to do harm, just not sure of the agent(s)...