Yes, losing two of our most vocal cultural critics who should gave known better about a lot of things has been eye-popping. It seems that once you get a name for yourself, it's almost impossible to tell the whole truth 100% if the time if there's a risk to your newfound fame. It's a fundamental flaw in human nature and one that costs all if us dearly.
Yes, losing two of our most vocal cultural critics who should gave known better about a lot of things has been eye-popping. It seems that once you get a name for yourself, it's almost impossible to tell the whole truth 100% if the time if there's a risk to your newfound fame. It's a fundamental flaw in human nature and one that costs all if us dearly.
Okay the only thing I might quibble about is that there is a big difference between "tell the whole truth 100% of the time" and "completely avoid the glaring story 100% of the time."
They both chose the latter. And it's embarrassing at this point.
Giant middle ground, and they both cower in the corner with the injections coursing through their bodies.
Yes, losing two of our most vocal cultural critics who should gave known better about a lot of things has been eye-popping. It seems that once you get a name for yourself, it's almost impossible to tell the whole truth 100% if the time if there's a risk to your newfound fame. It's a fundamental flaw in human nature and one that costs all if us dearly.
Okay the only thing I might quibble about is that there is a big difference between "tell the whole truth 100% of the time" and "completely avoid the glaring story 100% of the time."
They both chose the latter. And it's embarrassing at this point.
Giant middle ground, and they both cower in the corner with the injections coursing through their bodies.
Enormous disappointment, both of them.