The purported conclusions of the “Paris Agreement”and the IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ) studies as relates to alleged human cause has been and continues to be a deliberate misrepresentation of the findings & opinions of the great majority of involved scientific input, which has found very minimal scientific suppor…
The purported conclusions of the “Paris Agreement”and the IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ) studies as relates to alleged human cause has been and continues to be a deliberate misrepresentation of the findings & opinions of the great majority of involved scientific input, which has found very minimal scientific support for human caused warming. I posted a comment somewhere on 04/23/23 with a batch of IPCC scientists’ quotes on this misrepresentation. Not the first major scientific study subject advertising conclusions not supported by study contents when there is a strong agenda to be protected.
Their supposed 97% consensus of scientists, actually worked out to more like .03%. Amazing how flexible, inflexible mathematics can be, when put in the hands of those who like flexibility where it comes to scientific fact. Well, after all, 2+2=5 now, Winston.
The purported conclusions of the “Paris Agreement”and the IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ) studies as relates to alleged human cause has been and continues to be a deliberate misrepresentation of the findings & opinions of the great majority of involved scientific input, which has found very minimal scientific support for human caused warming. I posted a comment somewhere on 04/23/23 with a batch of IPCC scientists’ quotes on this misrepresentation. Not the first major scientific study subject advertising conclusions not supported by study contents when there is a strong agenda to be protected.
Their supposed 97% consensus of scientists, actually worked out to more like .03%. Amazing how flexible, inflexible mathematics can be, when put in the hands of those who like flexibility where it comes to scientific fact. Well, after all, 2+2=5 now, Winston.