6 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Primary "legitimate" uses are to maim and murder.

Expand full comment
Lloyd Miller's avatar

No. That is the current one designed to maim and murder. The technology could be targetted potentially at cancers or genetic disease, etc.

Expand full comment
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

As per all research studies, this is deadly tech.

Expand full comment
Lloyd Miller's avatar

As particularly tailored for the PlanDemic. Billions of different formulation of the modmRNA can be concocted besides the current one which instructs the cells to make the spike protein, a TOXIN which they understood in advance.

Expand full comment
Sid's avatar

You really have no idea what you are talking about. For starters the adjudant lipid nanoprticle technology that allows transfection is toxic in itself.

The substitution of uracil for a pseudouridine in the mRNA in itself is mutagenic.

When cells start expressing a protein for an indeterminate amount of time autoimmune respones causung inflammation cellular damage is inevitable leading to autoimmune diseases.

The spike protein in the mRNA expresses is indeed cytotoxic but the entire methodology as described is highly toxic irrespective of which protein is expressed.

Expand full comment
Lloyd Miller's avatar

Against a serious disease certain risks might be acceptable. Vaxxing the world? NO! Techniques to direct the nano to only the correct organs needs to be invented apparently.

However, the exact formulation wasn't known except to the inner circle subsequently awarded the Nobel Prize. Some assumed problems had been solved or COVID19 was so dangerous as to justify risks. FALSE!

Making sure the lipid nano could cross the brain barrier was a charming touch that was totally demonic. There was no reason for that except to increase damage to humans. A writer now suggests specific brain damage was targetted.

Expand full comment
ErrorError