5 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Apologies, typo in title edited.

And other typos too.

"If a child gets all of the vaccines in the entire schedule, they get almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, and they get almost 600 micrograms of mercury, plus over 200 different chemicals. So that's why they've never been proven to be safe."

--Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

The next question is what is a "safe" amount of aluminum and a "safe" amount of mercury and a "safe" amount of all the other chemicals pumped into kids? Also what was the rate per 100 kids that had autism, allergies, digestive issues, cancer etc.... years ago before all this happened compared to now?

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

Considering that the whole vax enterprise is a sham (they do more harm than god) the question of "what is a safe amount of mercury etc" is tantamount to asking "what is the RDA of mercury, aluminum etc?"

Because, if there is utterly no reason to be injecting people with sham "vaccines" containing "none of your business" chemicals then I guess we're to assume that there is a important RDA of "none of your business" chemicals that every human needs to have injected.

Or could it be as simple as "by golly we make a lot of money off that stuff"?

Living in NJ one of the pharma hot spots I know from living here that lots of upscale suburbs are going to have to change their business plan if all that scam vax money goes away. LOTS of nice upscale mortgages financed on the back of pharma. Imagine what happens to pediatric incomes and the incomes of lots of pharma exec's if the cash cow of injecting kids with "none of your business" for windfall profit goes away. That's A LOT of easy, bankable, INDEMNIGIED and protected money that would stop flowing to nice burbs around the country. Would need to figure a new scam to make up for the loss.

When you have completely indemnified MANDATED easy money (it is on "the schecule" which most parents assume is necessary to send their kids to school), it is very hard to get people to give up easy money even if kids are harmed in the process. PARTICULARLY since lots of that easy money percolates back to the lawless law makers in the form of campaign contributions

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

That chart says it all! What more do we need to know? Only other aspect is that those with poor functioning immune systems are more liable to die from the injection. If we could agree on a method of evaluating the health of the immune system, then in turn we could improve the immune system of those compromised and reduce the frequency of death from all pathogens. I would start with making sure the blood value of vitamin D is above 50 ng's. My view.

Expand full comment
Tracy Kolenchuk's avatar

The first step to evaluating the health of the immune system is recognizing that it has many interacting and many independent attributes, like Vitamin D status, and many processes dependent on those attributes.

But there is no interest in studying health. No medical professional cares if your immune system is at 40 percent, or 80 percent, or 100 percent. If you are not diseased, there is no medical attention.

Expand full comment