The next question is what is a "safe" amount of aluminum and a "safe" amount of mercury and a "safe" amount of all the other chemicals pumped into kids? Also what was the rate per 100 kids that had autism, allergies, digestive issues, cancer etc.... years ago before all this happened compared to now?
The next question is what is a "safe" amount of aluminum and a "safe" amount of mercury and a "safe" amount of all the other chemicals pumped into kids? Also what was the rate per 100 kids that had autism, allergies, digestive issues, cancer etc.... years ago before all this happened compared to now?
Considering that the whole vax enterprise is a sham (they do more harm than god) the question of "what is a safe amount of mercury etc" is tantamount to asking "what is the RDA of mercury, aluminum etc?"
Because, if there is utterly no reason to be injecting people with sham "vaccines" containing "none of your business" chemicals then I guess we're to assume that there is a important RDA of "none of your business" chemicals that every human needs to have injected.
Or could it be as simple as "by golly we make a lot of money off that stuff"?
Living in NJ one of the pharma hot spots I know from living here that lots of upscale suburbs are going to have to change their business plan if all that scam vax money goes away. LOTS of nice upscale mortgages financed on the back of pharma. Imagine what happens to pediatric incomes and the incomes of lots of pharma exec's if the cash cow of injecting kids with "none of your business" for windfall profit goes away. That's A LOT of easy, bankable, INDEMNIGIED and protected money that would stop flowing to nice burbs around the country. Would need to figure a new scam to make up for the loss.
When you have completely indemnified MANDATED easy money (it is on "the schecule" which most parents assume is necessary to send their kids to school), it is very hard to get people to give up easy money even if kids are harmed in the process. PARTICULARLY since lots of that easy money percolates back to the lawless law makers in the form of campaign contributions
The next question is what is a "safe" amount of aluminum and a "safe" amount of mercury and a "safe" amount of all the other chemicals pumped into kids? Also what was the rate per 100 kids that had autism, allergies, digestive issues, cancer etc.... years ago before all this happened compared to now?
Considering that the whole vax enterprise is a sham (they do more harm than god) the question of "what is a safe amount of mercury etc" is tantamount to asking "what is the RDA of mercury, aluminum etc?"
Because, if there is utterly no reason to be injecting people with sham "vaccines" containing "none of your business" chemicals then I guess we're to assume that there is a important RDA of "none of your business" chemicals that every human needs to have injected.
Or could it be as simple as "by golly we make a lot of money off that stuff"?
Living in NJ one of the pharma hot spots I know from living here that lots of upscale suburbs are going to have to change their business plan if all that scam vax money goes away. LOTS of nice upscale mortgages financed on the back of pharma. Imagine what happens to pediatric incomes and the incomes of lots of pharma exec's if the cash cow of injecting kids with "none of your business" for windfall profit goes away. That's A LOT of easy, bankable, INDEMNIGIED and protected money that would stop flowing to nice burbs around the country. Would need to figure a new scam to make up for the loss.
When you have completely indemnified MANDATED easy money (it is on "the schecule" which most parents assume is necessary to send their kids to school), it is very hard to get people to give up easy money even if kids are harmed in the process. PARTICULARLY since lots of that easy money percolates back to the lawless law makers in the form of campaign contributions