Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TerdFergesun's avatar

As one of the useless bureaucrats I can definitively say that 50% could go and no one would miss them or even notice. During COVID when the entire workforce was able to declare themselves high-risk and stay home for a year and a half from work, we were never more efficient. Those of us who did have to go in to work (because we were the actual producers), got so much done because there were no meetings, no committees, and no layers upon layers of review to make decisions. We just made decisions and resource allocations, prioritized the work and got stuff done. It was the most efficient we've ever been. You could get by with only keeping the top 50% of the workforce. And because the Democrats feared that, they changed all of the annual evaluations to be pass or fail; no more scores on a 5 point scale. They should just pull the last scored evaluations out of the HR systems and fire the bottom half; then fire the HR people and the Equal Opportunity people (who were the DEI team but since Trump were rebranded to EO).

Expand full comment
EmilyTVProducer's avatar

Also, I posted this Stack to FB, which is full of deranged & vaxx injured mental freaks who like to comment on my timeline (I don't read their retarded missives or reply to them). The caption to my post is "The rapidly metastasizing abomination that is the illegitimate Federal government has been shut down since yesterday due to democrats demanding $1.5 trillion in spending for illegal invader healthcare, child sex mutilation surgeries, and other deranged idiocy."

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?