Ahh nope. Not correct. I've said neither of those things. You've said them. I have simply pointed out that it makes absolutely no difference whether it's proven there IS or ISN'T a "virus" and that continuing to focus/argue over the concept, detracts and distracts from the larger picture being brought to life. Governments around the worl…
Ahh nope. Not correct. I've said neither of those things. You've said them.
I have simply pointed out that it makes absolutely no difference whether it's proven there IS or ISN'T a "virus" and that continuing to focus/argue over the concept, detracts and distracts from the larger picture being brought to life.
Governments around the world have and are continuing to break the social contracts that hold modern society together. Regardless of whether a virus exists or not. They are moving full steam ahead with their great reset juggernaut.
Will proving viral theory wrong change that? Nope. Because the juggernaut is moving, whether the fuel is virus, WW3 or climate change, or the next one...civil riots. All disproving germ theory/virology as a sham does, is allow people to fully comprehend how badly and willfully they have been hurt, under the guise of bureaucratic altruism and scientisim. Which ultimately leads to civil unrest....🤔😐
So back to my original remark- focusing on whether virology theory is valid or not, is like focusing on whether the Beech tree is more important to protect than the Aspen, while the whole forest is currently burning. That discussion is a little bit too late. Should definitely continue at some point, perhaps AFTER we have gotten rid of the legislation and groundwork for the great reset total subjugation of humanity?🤔 Totally BJMO.
Ok, now that I'm clear on that, I would have to say that I disagree. To me, lockdowns, masking, church and business closures and especially mass genocide by toxic jabs, are all worthy of stopping by simply educating the public about falsehood of the underlying premise. Are all of those things combined worse than breaking your social contract? I think most would say yes.
I should explain that as a Cristian anarchist, the breaking of a social contract doesn't rank very high on the scale of importance. Besides, the breaking of that contract began long ago. Trying to fix it now seems like to little, too late. Why whine about it now when fixing it seems unlikely? It should have been fixed a hundred years ago.
Meanwhile, a lot of people are having their lives changed by learning that germ theory is bogus.
I think David Martin is pretty clear that a “pathogen”, NOT from nature was synthetically produced & released. That is key here - fear porn arises when people are led to believe that it is possible for viruses to jump from animals to humans & also are enhanced by GOF. Reality seems to be that pandemics are actually impossible, but sporadic release of toxins/poison with ginned up testing, suppression of treatment & killing protocols created the illusion of virus-caused pandemic.
That doesn't take into account the effects of 5G and other harmful forms of EMF's. I'd also point out that the viral program may be a distraction from the greater agenda - seeding nano tech (think derivatives of graphine oxide) - that can be manipulated by certain frequencies of EMF's - throughout the population. Symptoms can be similar.
So debating virus theory is more important, than making sure that the "Amendments for International Health Regulations",as directed by the W.H.O. and 123 signatory countries, which are trying to give the ultimate power in declaring pandemic emergency powers and their countermeasures to one person- the head of W.H.O. ??!!
Virus theory is more important than THAT??🤨😐🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
People can believe whatever viral theory they like. However, they need to understand the legal machinations occurring right under their noses more. Or they will be debating virus theory while they are held down, shot full of new gen mRNA "health products", and force quarantined. Indefinitely. Pretty sure that will change their lives too.
Your wording is misleading. I didn't say anything about debating. And what does that amendment have to do with upholding social contracts?
In the big picture, if the majority of people in any given country understood that germ theory is bogus, anything the WHO does will go nowhere. That, my friend, is what the forest looks like from where I stand.
Respectfully, we will just have to agree to disagree on priorities for the masses to understand. 🤗 If you don't understand what social contracts have to do with the WHO Amendments to the International Health Regulations, I would suggest re-reading them. James Roguski's Substack has the most in-depth information and access to them. Although Dr Merryl Nass has been covering it as well on her Substack.
Yes, some people think the WHO have no teeth to impact anything at an individual's level. These Amendments are about changing that completely. They get teeth. Big teeth.
People have been debating viral theory for hundred plus years. Most people cannot hold contradictory concepts in their heads at the one time, without causing cognitive distress. So trying to discuss viral theory, and understanding that germ and terrain theories are BOTH right, and at the same time BOTH wrong, is more than most will be comfortable with. Not because their smart enough, but they have already been dealing with a whole lot the last 3+years! Besides, most peeps dont understand (or have even heard of) the "Pandemic Treaty" by the WHO, or even understand that it is not the same as the "Amendments to the International Health Regulations", which is the legal machinations occurring right now to make one person (Tedros) able to declare Pandemic, without evidence. 😐
So on his say so. In any country. Using any countermeasure.
So what importance does viral theory have in that scenario?🤔😉
I don’t feel the same about the virus part. I believe it’s imperative knowing exactly how and who created these viruses now known to be solely because of humans. Otherwise, aren’t they then able to continue making more down the road, if not already?
That's exactly what they want you to think. The more people that believe that the more lockdowns, closures, masking, jabs and plandemics well have. As #2 would say, do not comply.
Ahh nope. Not correct. I've said neither of those things. You've said them.
I have simply pointed out that it makes absolutely no difference whether it's proven there IS or ISN'T a "virus" and that continuing to focus/argue over the concept, detracts and distracts from the larger picture being brought to life.
Governments around the world have and are continuing to break the social contracts that hold modern society together. Regardless of whether a virus exists or not. They are moving full steam ahead with their great reset juggernaut.
Will proving viral theory wrong change that? Nope. Because the juggernaut is moving, whether the fuel is virus, WW3 or climate change, or the next one...civil riots. All disproving germ theory/virology as a sham does, is allow people to fully comprehend how badly and willfully they have been hurt, under the guise of bureaucratic altruism and scientisim. Which ultimately leads to civil unrest....🤔😐
So back to my original remark- focusing on whether virology theory is valid or not, is like focusing on whether the Beech tree is more important to protect than the Aspen, while the whole forest is currently burning. That discussion is a little bit too late. Should definitely continue at some point, perhaps AFTER we have gotten rid of the legislation and groundwork for the great reset total subjugation of humanity?🤔 Totally BJMO.
#wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforget
Ok, now that I'm clear on that, I would have to say that I disagree. To me, lockdowns, masking, church and business closures and especially mass genocide by toxic jabs, are all worthy of stopping by simply educating the public about falsehood of the underlying premise. Are all of those things combined worse than breaking your social contract? I think most would say yes.
I should explain that as a Cristian anarchist, the breaking of a social contract doesn't rank very high on the scale of importance. Besides, the breaking of that contract began long ago. Trying to fix it now seems like to little, too late. Why whine about it now when fixing it seems unlikely? It should have been fixed a hundred years ago.
Meanwhile, a lot of people are having their lives changed by learning that germ theory is bogus.
I think David Martin is pretty clear that a “pathogen”, NOT from nature was synthetically produced & released. That is key here - fear porn arises when people are led to believe that it is possible for viruses to jump from animals to humans & also are enhanced by GOF. Reality seems to be that pandemics are actually impossible, but sporadic release of toxins/poison with ginned up testing, suppression of treatment & killing protocols created the illusion of virus-caused pandemic.
That doesn't take into account the effects of 5G and other harmful forms of EMF's. I'd also point out that the viral program may be a distraction from the greater agenda - seeding nano tech (think derivatives of graphine oxide) - that can be manipulated by certain frequencies of EMF's - throughout the population. Symptoms can be similar.
So debating virus theory is more important, than making sure that the "Amendments for International Health Regulations",as directed by the W.H.O. and 123 signatory countries, which are trying to give the ultimate power in declaring pandemic emergency powers and their countermeasures to one person- the head of W.H.O. ??!!
Virus theory is more important than THAT??🤨😐🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
People can believe whatever viral theory they like. However, they need to understand the legal machinations occurring right under their noses more. Or they will be debating virus theory while they are held down, shot full of new gen mRNA "health products", and force quarantined. Indefinitely. Pretty sure that will change their lives too.
Your wording is misleading. I didn't say anything about debating. And what does that amendment have to do with upholding social contracts?
In the big picture, if the majority of people in any given country understood that germ theory is bogus, anything the WHO does will go nowhere. That, my friend, is what the forest looks like from where I stand.
Respectfully, we will just have to agree to disagree on priorities for the masses to understand. 🤗 If you don't understand what social contracts have to do with the WHO Amendments to the International Health Regulations, I would suggest re-reading them. James Roguski's Substack has the most in-depth information and access to them. Although Dr Merryl Nass has been covering it as well on her Substack.
Yes, some people think the WHO have no teeth to impact anything at an individual's level. These Amendments are about changing that completely. They get teeth. Big teeth.
Bingo!
People have been debating viral theory for hundred plus years. Most people cannot hold contradictory concepts in their heads at the one time, without causing cognitive distress. So trying to discuss viral theory, and understanding that germ and terrain theories are BOTH right, and at the same time BOTH wrong, is more than most will be comfortable with. Not because their smart enough, but they have already been dealing with a whole lot the last 3+years! Besides, most peeps dont understand (or have even heard of) the "Pandemic Treaty" by the WHO, or even understand that it is not the same as the "Amendments to the International Health Regulations", which is the legal machinations occurring right now to make one person (Tedros) able to declare Pandemic, without evidence. 😐
So on his say so. In any country. Using any countermeasure.
So what importance does viral theory have in that scenario?🤔😉
I don’t feel the same about the virus part. I believe it’s imperative knowing exactly how and who created these viruses now known to be solely because of humans. Otherwise, aren’t they then able to continue making more down the road, if not already?
That's exactly what they want you to think. The more people that believe that the more lockdowns, closures, masking, jabs and plandemics well have. As #2 would say, do not comply.