So debating virus theory is more important, than making sure that the "Amendments for International Health Regulations",as directed by the W.H.O. and 123 signatory countries, which are trying to give the ultimate power in declaring pandemic emergency powers and their countermeasures to one person- the head of W.H.O. ??!! Virus theory is …
So debating virus theory is more important, than making sure that the "Amendments for International Health Regulations",as directed by the W.H.O. and 123 signatory countries, which are trying to give the ultimate power in declaring pandemic emergency powers and their countermeasures to one person- the head of W.H.O. ??!!
Virus theory is more important than THAT??🤨😐🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
People can believe whatever viral theory they like. However, they need to understand the legal machinations occurring right under their noses more. Or they will be debating virus theory while they are held down, shot full of new gen mRNA "health products", and force quarantined. Indefinitely. Pretty sure that will change their lives too.
Your wording is misleading. I didn't say anything about debating. And what does that amendment have to do with upholding social contracts?
In the big picture, if the majority of people in any given country understood that germ theory is bogus, anything the WHO does will go nowhere. That, my friend, is what the forest looks like from where I stand.
Respectfully, we will just have to agree to disagree on priorities for the masses to understand. 🤗 If you don't understand what social contracts have to do with the WHO Amendments to the International Health Regulations, I would suggest re-reading them. James Roguski's Substack has the most in-depth information and access to them. Although Dr Merryl Nass has been covering it as well on her Substack.
Yes, some people think the WHO have no teeth to impact anything at an individual's level. These Amendments are about changing that completely. They get teeth. Big teeth.
So debating virus theory is more important, than making sure that the "Amendments for International Health Regulations",as directed by the W.H.O. and 123 signatory countries, which are trying to give the ultimate power in declaring pandemic emergency powers and their countermeasures to one person- the head of W.H.O. ??!!
Virus theory is more important than THAT??🤨😐🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
People can believe whatever viral theory they like. However, they need to understand the legal machinations occurring right under their noses more. Or they will be debating virus theory while they are held down, shot full of new gen mRNA "health products", and force quarantined. Indefinitely. Pretty sure that will change their lives too.
Your wording is misleading. I didn't say anything about debating. And what does that amendment have to do with upholding social contracts?
In the big picture, if the majority of people in any given country understood that germ theory is bogus, anything the WHO does will go nowhere. That, my friend, is what the forest looks like from where I stand.
Respectfully, we will just have to agree to disagree on priorities for the masses to understand. 🤗 If you don't understand what social contracts have to do with the WHO Amendments to the International Health Regulations, I would suggest re-reading them. James Roguski's Substack has the most in-depth information and access to them. Although Dr Merryl Nass has been covering it as well on her Substack.
Yes, some people think the WHO have no teeth to impact anything at an individual's level. These Amendments are about changing that completely. They get teeth. Big teeth.
Bingo!