False flags or slander? Some fighters are even accused of being controlled opposition to numb us down and sink scarce resources. Most assume that they are doing the people’s job and therefore, so “we the people” can relax and do nothing: a classic false flag operation. In order to have controlled opposition, the person must appear to pro…
Some fighters are even accused of being controlled opposition to numb us down and sink scarce resources. Most assume that they are doing the people’s job and therefore, so “we the people” can relax and do nothing: a classic false flag operation.
In order to have controlled opposition, the person must appear to provide the correct anti-narrative, at least in certain issues, like Berenson (masks, lockdowns, COVID lab-origin, vaccine injuries). The actor has to make his followers believe he is fighting for them, so they can relax.
Under such definition, anyone not suing government and Big Pharma could be a suspect of false flag. For example, some accuse Berenson of suing for himself to recover damages, not the common good.
Moreover, anyone not pointing to the true problem and solutions could also be accused.
The following examples are accusations that should be given the benefit of the doubt: anyone can make mistakes, anyone can commit sins of pride (the higher the easier). Everyone is needed in this war. No-one is expendable!
The slanderers are denying basic humane rights:
• to private fraternal correction
• to be presumed innocent until proven guilty
• to have a good name free of slander
• to defend themselves in direct confrontation
Some of the accused are:
Alex Berenson: attacked HCQ, IVM and vaccine injured.1
Dr. Ryan Cole, says the nano-routers are stacked cholesterol, sugar and salt crystals.2
Dr. Robert Malone, had a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-20173) and was promoting haccinating the elderly before his conversion. He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each. 4
By not giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? If he could, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide. By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Others say that it’s strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE?
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the high risk and working for a Bio-defence contract.6
24 Jun 2021 he twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ He didn’t answer. 7
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 8, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections, 3 years late. Also, by Jan 2020, Malone had shown that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 9 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023!
False flags or slander?
Some fighters are even accused of being controlled opposition to numb us down and sink scarce resources. Most assume that they are doing the people’s job and therefore, so “we the people” can relax and do nothing: a classic false flag operation.
In order to have controlled opposition, the person must appear to provide the correct anti-narrative, at least in certain issues, like Berenson (masks, lockdowns, COVID lab-origin, vaccine injuries). The actor has to make his followers believe he is fighting for them, so they can relax.
Under such definition, anyone not suing government and Big Pharma could be a suspect of false flag. For example, some accuse Berenson of suing for himself to recover damages, not the common good.
Moreover, anyone not pointing to the true problem and solutions could also be accused.
The following examples are accusations that should be given the benefit of the doubt: anyone can make mistakes, anyone can commit sins of pride (the higher the easier). Everyone is needed in this war. No-one is expendable!
The slanderers are denying basic humane rights:
• to private fraternal correction
• to be presumed innocent until proven guilty
• to have a good name free of slander
• to defend themselves in direct confrontation
Some of the accused are:
Alex Berenson: attacked HCQ, IVM and vaccine injured.1
Dr. Ryan Cole, says the nano-routers are stacked cholesterol, sugar and salt crystals.2
Dr. Robert Malone, had a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-20173) and was promoting haccinating the elderly before his conversion. He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each. 4
By not giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? If he could, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide. By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Others say that it’s strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE?
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the high risk and working for a Bio-defence contract.6
24 Jun 2021 he twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ He didn’t answer. 7
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 8, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections, 3 years late. Also, by Jan 2020, Malone had shown that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 9 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023!
You might like this:
The next threats and the solution:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
In that substack, I'm about to post something huge !