7 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
R U Kidding me.'s avatar

It never made sense when Malone said he got the vax after already having went through a natural infection of covid.

He said he got the vax because he thought it would help with his long covid symptoms???!!! When I heard that I thought hmmmmmm.

Then he showed up out of the blue. And then we hear that ex-cia guy who was travelling throughout China and Asia when the pandemic started contacted Malone.

Why? To get his team together? Why would Malone have a team???

It never made sense why Malone information was slipping out but Yeadon info was totally blocked by google, fb, Twitter etc till recently.

Now Malone is going all in on Desmet? Why??!! It’s all ludicrous.

Seems like he was a “limited hangout” to provide us with some info to help us as the cia knew the big pharma scam going on? He also gave the cia/democrats a coverup timeline of when the virus came out and when the government became aware.

They are covering up that covid was out months or years earlier!!!! Malone is helping the government!!! Now that he is not needed anymore he is going to discredit and takeout people to make conservatives look crazy. What a double agent. Lol

Expand full comment
Free Range Poverty Lawyer's avatar

As Mark Kulacz at Housatonic Live has argued, Malone may be partly responsible for the widespread use of Remdesivir. Malone claims he talked to his CIA friend in China early in the breakout and was told to get "his team" at DTRA ready. Malone had just set up the DOMANE artificial intelligence countermeasure database, a month or two before, which purported to spit out Remdesivir and Hydroxychloroquine as the best countermeasures for the Rona. This fact, along with the supposed successful compassionate use of Remdesivir on the USA's patient zero in Washington state, and Fauci's claim that China was "using" Remdesivir (China was actually only conducting studies which they later discontinued after being dangerous and ineffective), as well as the previous papers by Ralph Baric and Sina Bavari, etc., identifying Remdesivir as a possible therapeutic for some future virus that had not yet existed, even though Remdesivir failed all previous applications for other diseases, led to the adoption of Remdesivir in exclusion to all other therapeutics, and likely caused the death of tens or hundreds of thousands.

Expand full comment
Free Range Poverty Lawyer's avatar

"Malone is part of a classified project called DOMANE that uses computer simulations, artificial intelligence, and other methods to rapidly identify U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and other safe compounds that can be repurposed against threats such as new viruses."

https://www.science.org/content/article/new-york-clinical-trial-quietly-tests-heartburn-remedy-against-coronavirus

Michael Callahan is the person I think Malone spoke to early on in the breakout

Btw, Mark Kulacz suspects the Famotidine study was intended to focus resources on an ineffective therapeutic to grease the wheels for Remdesivir.

Expand full comment
Free Range Poverty Lawyer's avatar

Correction, I guess DOMANE spit out Ivermectin, not Hydroxychloroquine, as another possible therapeutic.

https://www.dvidshub.net/news/388359/dtras-therapeutic-arm-latches-fda-approved-and-affordable-drugs-covid-19-relief

https://sagehana.substack.com/p/dtra-domane-and-remdesivir

Hydroxychloroquine had been identified previously as a possible therapeutic, as well as the monoclonal antibodies developed by a Chinese scientist accused of being a spy: https://www.macleans.ca/longforms/winnipeg-virus-lab-scientist/

Expand full comment
JohnSmith's avatar

Like his own substack title says, "Who is Robert Malone?" Inquiring minds want to know...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Dec 6, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Prof. Fred Nazar's avatar

You are better than that. By insulting Catholics, you leave out 1 billion who could help in the fight. By accusing the Jesuits and the Pope without any EVIDENCE you are promoting slander and assuming (haughtiness?) 1 billion Catholics are stupid for not finding what you did.

That doesn't mean that all Jesuits are saints and that the Pope doesn't make mistakes. They are humans. Whoever is without sin throw the first stone. Your comment is barbaric digital stoning.

Read point 7 here:

https://www.catholic365.com/article/26130/dog-beats-artificial-intelligence.html

Then, find humility with this:

John.8

[1] Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.

[2] And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.

[3] And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,

[4] They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

[5] Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

[6] This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

[7] So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

[8] And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

[9] And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

[10] When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

[11] She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

Expand full comment
ErrorError