6 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Jonathan Ramsay's avatar

So....the taxpayers are going to bail out Oprah and Prince Harry....isn’t that nice of them.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

I keep on telling you all, The Crown is the Root of All Evil, and so, quite naturally, tfe Duke of Sussex will be covered in this or any other unpleasant circumstance

Expand full comment
Moonspinner's avatar

Ah, but which family married into The Crown in the 19th century and control it now?

Expand full comment
John's avatar

A bunch of German Petty Princes known as " The Studs of Europe" for the many thrones they have usurped .

Apparently, what made Victoria mourn so deeply for her beloved Albert was missing his " Big One".

Expand full comment
John's avatar

I read it, but I am dubious about his conclusions.

For instance, five Bar attorneys as signatories supposedly invalidated the document.

What about the majority of signers who were not?

The Royals are Figureheads, but the Monarch is a full member of two Temples?

This was a very popular topic on line twenty years ago.

I have seen multiple analysis, and none was entirely convincing, including this one.

The basic facts may be accurate, but I am unconvinced by the conclusions.

The idea that a Bar Attorney is obligated to the Templar, with out realizing it seems especially doubtful.

I don't believe anything that doesn't clearly state the obligations of the signer can be enforced.

All in all, I believe the only hope of getting an accurate analysis is to have an actual attorney evaluate it

It's an interesting article, but I don't believe Francis is actually qualified to analyze it .

Expand full comment