6 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

There is a reason why direct and un-apportioned are grouped together.

Expand full comment
1776's avatar

Yes, I am familiar with all three Constitutions. Intimately.

What I think you may not be grasping is that the IRS does not levy direct or un-apportioned taxes. They can't. They have to operate according to their own rules. And they do, assidiously.

They administer the -Internal- Revenue of the DC City State. It is extra-territorial to The United States and The United States of America.

Their authority does not extend outside DC, as per 26 USC 7701. Unless they are collecting excise from their employees functioning as "residents" in our Country (The United States of America and the 50 states, which they have nothing to say about).

The Tax on Federal Income is an excise. It is voluntary. Several IRS Commissioners have, on record, attested to that fact. It is voluntary because people are voluntarily accepting foreign statuses "gifted" to them.

It's why you fill out the 1040 form yourself. It is your choice, and you are assumed to know if you need to do it.

"We" (Americans) are supposed to have Fee-Simple grants to our soil, not alloidal "Title" (which is a grant from the Queen). It probably should be re-iterated that U.S. Citizens and citizens of the United States -cannot- own property in this country, they can only rent it (and pay ground rent in the form of "use tax/property tax" in so doing).

Americans are Americans, United Statesians are United Statesians. Until and unless you correct the presumption that you are the latter, you cannot claim to be the former.

Expand full comment
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Re what IRS levies not being direct and un-apportioned is implicit as per my article re: color of law voluntary gifting sleight of hand.

You are wrong on allodial as Framers defined it since clearly they were anti-queen etc.

fee simple absolute does not protect us against property taxes which are illegal.

anyhow, good luck arguing any of this in court.

Expand full comment
1776's avatar

I am not arguing that they are not using sleight of hand.

That is the root of all of this. They are stealing people from the Land of their birth, telling them that they are "Employees" ("Citizens") before they can even speak yay or nay, and then taxing what they make as if it is "Federally Connected."

Fee simple has worked just fine in the several cases I have assisted with. The key, as I have been saying, is ensuring you have correct status and standing. And I never "argue" anything in court. That is for fools, and inevitably leads to a bad outcome.

Courts of limited jurisdiction usually involve a Status Hearing, and immediate dismissal. This ain't my first rodeo, and the last line made me smile.

U.S. Citizens absolutely owe property taxes, since -they are here as temporary residents only.- Alloidal -Title- is a grant of nobility (all "Titles" are). Americans cannot accept foreign Titles, as it compromises their status. We hold our land rent-free because it belongs to us.

I realize you don't know me, but I am not bringing this up in a "theoretical" mode, but from direct experience. As always, given freely, yours to do with as you choose. If what you are advocating/doing works, then more's the better.

Expand full comment
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Given what you have written, I am scared to ask what your win/lose court ratio is.

Fee simple allows for prop taxes which should never be paid irrespective of State's Rights and the residents "owning" their home in the sovereign nation state.....

If you were to actually do some research you would know that certain states like Nevada actually do grant Allodial Title for property, rare as it is.

Anyhow, good luck to you.

Expand full comment
1776's avatar

My "win/lose" ratio? I am an American, thus not an attorney.

I have succeeded every time in extricating Americans that have been kidnapped into foreign jurisdiction, with dismissal in every instance. Improper venue and lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

It would be the same if a Canadian court swooped in and kidnapped them. Foreign jurisdictions are foreign. They are just used to easy, intimidated prey that don't know who they are.

I suppose my question should be "have you corrected your status, or are you still functioning as a U.S. Employee (citizen)?"

That makes all the difference.

"States of States" are business entities, federal franchises, and have no "sovereignty." An entity that is chartered by another cannot, by definition, be "sovereign." "States" are Land jurisdiction Nations. "states" are soil jurisdiction estates upon which people live.

Anyone that is knowingly functioning as a foreign government services employee/resident here (U.S. Citizens/citizens of the United States), cannot own property. If you think that is untrue, stop paying your property taxes, or your "vehicle registrations."

There are no "rights" for British Tories or Roman slaves upon the 50 states. And you can argue until you are blue in the face, but the fact remains, unless the record has been corrected, you are presumed to be crazy. It's horrific, and I am not advocating it. But it is the configuration space as of now.

Try bringing up "The" Constitution in court (never mind there are three of them). The hired jurist will likely threaten you with contempt if you bring it up again. Employees cannot use their service contracts to extricate themselves from their employee obligations.

After all, you are already guilty if you are a citizen of the United States (definition of a 14th Amendment citizen is "criminal.").

We are saying the same thing, but the fact that the last 160 years have been a deliberate mind-fu** and literal war against Americans makes it difficult to see.

Most of the current "proposed solutions" are dummy-loads, designed to get people to expend time and resources on a dead end. These criminals have had almost two centuries to fine-tune their grift. They have culled the strong and the brave, and have subjected the survivors to non-stop psychological warfare.

I thank you for your well-wishes, and sincerely send you the same.

Expand full comment
ErrorError