Last month a 52 year old African American that my husband worked with died overnight suddenly, didn’t wake up. He had been fighting some sort of cancer for a long time so everyone just attributed it to that. I’ve seen many people die of cancer and none of them just didn’t wake up. It is a painful wasting process and none of them were able to work at the end stages. No one wants to even entertain that there is something else culpable.

Goes to show that even many doctors and nurses still think the alphabet agencies are put in place to keep us safe. It’s tragic that these people either trusted too much, or if they were smart enough NOT to trust the alphabet groups, the Canadian mandates made them take the clot shot. I have nurse friends here in the USA, able to see the writing on the wall and some that think what they are told to think.

If you’re going to make up data at least do it properly. The original chart was for RATES per 100k, not for absolute incidence, so when you divide “unvaccinated” into two groups they should still have the same average value as the original. You literally just reduced the metrics of both “unvaccinated” groups in your modified graph by an arbitrary amount. This is just basic math. Learn how to read graphs. If you want to redo this you will need to estimate the proportion of “unvaccinated” who were actually not jabbed and somehow estimate the metrics for true unvaxed vs single-jabbed. Hint: the single-jabbed rate will end up HIGHER than the original “unvaccinated” rate.

I think you may want to reread this post. Jessica Rose did the math, and she's quite good at it. She split the unvaccinated into 80/20 whereby 80% had first injection w/in 0-13 days.

Yes, and indeed 3.3 *.8 is exactly 2.64. But as I said these are rates per 100k persons per day.

As an analogy, say you had a chart that said grain liquors had an average proof of 50, but you knew they combined whiskey, with sake, in that category, and you estimated that 75% of the hooch was whiskey but it was three times as concentrated as the sake. Then using variable x for the proof of sake, .25*x+.75*(x*3)=50, so we find the sake would have been 20 proof and the whiskey 60 proof. Notice the 60 is larger than the initial weighted group average of 50.

MedPage Today has tried to refute at least 3 of those deaths with a “aggressive cancer” diagnosis. Wonder what made it so aggressive… The coverup will continue until the hospitalists wake up and see the truth, then do something about it. I’m not holding my breath.

Last month a 52 year old African American that my husband worked with died overnight suddenly, didn’t wake up. He had been fighting some sort of cancer for a long time so everyone just attributed it to that. I’ve seen many people die of cancer and none of them just didn’t wake up. It is a painful wasting process and none of them were able to work at the end stages. No one wants to even entertain that there is something else culpable.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/100098

Here is what was on MedPage Today. Coverup?

100%

Thank you for shining light on this.....Canada loves you!!!

edited Aug 7, 2022Goes to show that even many doctors and nurses still think the alphabet agencies are put in place to keep us safe. It’s tragic that these people either trusted too much, or if they were smart enough NOT to trust the alphabet groups, the Canadian mandates made them take the clot shot. I have nurse friends here in the USA, able to see the writing on the wall and some that think what they are told to think.

Critical thinking seems to be lacking in many.

It's pretty f--king obvious...we are being silently murdered.

If you’re going to make up data at least do it properly. The original chart was for RATES per 100k, not for absolute incidence, so when you divide “unvaccinated” into two groups they should still have the same average value as the original. You literally just reduced the metrics of both “unvaccinated” groups in your modified graph by an arbitrary amount. This is just basic math. Learn how to read graphs. If you want to redo this you will need to estimate the proportion of “unvaccinated” who were actually not jabbed and somehow estimate the metrics for true unvaxed vs single-jabbed. Hint: the single-jabbed rate will end up HIGHER than the original “unvaccinated” rate.

I think you may want to reread this post. Jessica Rose did the math, and she's quite good at it. She split the unvaccinated into 80/20 whereby 80% had first injection w/in 0-13 days.

Yes, and indeed 3.3 *.8 is exactly 2.64. But as I said these are rates per 100k persons per day.

As an analogy, say you had a chart that said grain liquors had an average proof of 50, but you knew they combined whiskey, with sake, in that category, and you estimated that 75% of the hooch was whiskey but it was three times as concentrated as the sake. Then using variable x for the proof of sake, .25*x+.75*(x*3)=50, so we find the sake would have been 20 proof and the whiskey 60 proof. Notice the 60 is larger than the initial weighted group average of 50.

Because of all kinds of gov data fuckery, we are simply making estimates as accurately as possible vs the coverup official narratives.

I hate eugenics programs!

Me, too! :-(

MedPage Today has tried to refute at least 3 of those deaths with a “aggressive cancer” diagnosis. Wonder what made it so aggressive… The coverup will continue until the hospitalists wake up and see the truth, then do something about it. I’m not holding my breath.

edited Aug 7, 2022Comment removedSo sorry about your loss.

Really sorry. So much criminality!