In fact, if that chart is even remotely truly representing reality, then statisticians must draw the twin conclusions that either: 1) vaxxination and incidence of infection are correlated (except China), or 2) that the methods of "counting" "cases" and "incidence" varies from location to location and is inconsistent. Assuming China not t…
In fact, if that chart is even remotely truly representing reality, then statisticians must draw the twin conclusions that either: 1) vaxxination and incidence of infection are correlated (except China), or 2) that the methods of "counting" "cases" and "incidence" varies from location to location and is inconsistent. Assuming China not to be an exception - then clearly #2 is correct.
Most all we know is filtered through mainstream media (MSM) which has mandates to "not tell the truth", compliments of the FCC act - which has analogues in each country! So, whether they use, don't use, said to use or not, how do we tell a fiction story from a truthful story, especially if MSM echoes it? LOL
In fact, if that chart is even remotely truly representing reality, then statisticians must draw the twin conclusions that either: 1) vaxxination and incidence of infection are correlated (except China), or 2) that the methods of "counting" "cases" and "incidence" varies from location to location and is inconsistent. Assuming China not to be an exception - then clearly #2 is correct.
There is 3rd possibility - and that is Genevieve Briand's hypothesis - https://web.archive.org/web/20201126171926/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 meaning we have a normal endemic 22 months.
China never used mRNA "vaccines".
Most all we know is filtered through mainstream media (MSM) which has mandates to "not tell the truth", compliments of the FCC act - which has analogues in each country! So, whether they use, don't use, said to use or not, how do we tell a fiction story from a truthful story, especially if MSM echoes it? LOL