SCOTUS throws us a couple of bones, but on the major rulings like mail -in ballots and birthright citizenship, they give the country a giant FU. It’s up to Congress, which means we’re screwed. All three branches of government are compromised with globalists. The coalition of Democrats and RINOs has run this country for over 100 years.
Sadly, I think you are probably correct. Why, with all our government has been guilty of and concealed from the public, would we think threats would be beneath them?
I am starting to think that there is no one in our government institutions that is willing or capable of doing the right thing regarding our constitution !!!
It’s just a free for all making up the rules as they go along.
"James Coney" Barrett turned out to be a real hot dog, voting with the libs all the time. You can always count on a so-called conservative to side with libs when it really counts, and esp. when we're counting votes. Take me back to Florida and the hanging chads, it was better then.
Looks like I'm celebrating 250 years since the country's funding and my 7th Great Grandfather, Clayborne Howard of Virginia, fighting in and surviving the American Revolution, by going tax exempt for the rest of the month, maybe the year. It's what the founders technically wanted seeing as the Articles of Confederation did t allow for the collection of taxes.
Why children of foreigners who are in the U.S. temporarily or illegally are not legit U.S. citizens, unless naturalized:
LEGISLATIVE INTENT: requires that the U.S. not claim as citizens babies born to anyone not in the country legally & permanently.
The Congressional Record shows:
-Congress wanted to give citizenship & rights to former slaves & their descendants.
-Congress was concerned that another Congress might revoke the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the first civil rights law enacted, which was written in response to the denial of citizenship & rights to Negros by certain States (before Amend 14, citizenship was only through the States).
-The intent was to incorporate that Act into the Constitution, while keeping the wording brief.
-Discussion about the proposed wording included eassurance that 'foreigners would not become citizens under Amend. XIV', nor the children of people in the U.S. temporarily - such as diplomats & sojourners / visitors.
“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens…” - Jacob Howard (1866), the main author of Amend.14.
Mattox vs. U.S. S.C. U.S. (1895)
"We [the court justices] are BOUND to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted." - "Bound" means they have no option.
The law regarding citizenship at the time the 14th Amendment was adopted:
The Civil Rights Act - 1866
"...all persons born in the U.S., AND NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FOREIGN POWER, excluding Indians not taxed [because Indians were citizens of their own nations], are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States;
and such citizens, of every race and color,... shall have the same right, in every State & Territory in the U.S., to:
make & enforce contracts, to sue, be parties & give evidence [in court], to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold & convey real & personal property, & to full & equal benefit of all laws & proceedings for the security of person & property, AS IS ENJOYED BY WHITE CITIZENS, & shall be subject to like punishment, pains, & penalties, & to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding."
"All persons born in the U.S., & SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF [not subject to the jurisdiction of any foreign power] , are citizens of the U.S. & of the State wherein they reside.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges & immunities of citizens of the U.S.;
nor shall any State deprive any [such] person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law;
nor deny to any [such] person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
THE PLAIN TEXT: Unless otherwise specified, all "persons" referred to IN THE SAME SENTENCE are the same status: citizens.
PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT:
1st Paragraph, U.S. Constitution
"We the [actual] People [actually] of the United States, in order to... secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
...thereby constituting- creating - the government of our federation of "Free and Independent States". Government in these United States has no other purpose but to protect OUR Rights.
Not to grant Rights & give benefits to foreigners, or their children.
NATURAL LAW: Children have always belonged to their parents- except under slavery or serfdom. Children inherit their parents' genes, name, property & CITIZENSHIP.
If they finally got their act together and declared Biden's and Obana's presidencies as the fake years of torture they were, then their Supreme Court appointments could be nullified.
And going back to correct history--- the illegal coup in 1913 which created the non Federal Reserve and its control of our money and the almost total devaluation of the dollar could also be reversed. The Supreme Puppets have just voted to extend the Commie Coup to wipe out the concept of legitimate citizens and legal voting. You go Supremies! And take a warning from Citizen Viligante regarding fair treatment of deserving judges!
The public was told that 'not a hair of a working man's head' would be touched by Amendment XIV, and that only "income" such as interest and the like would be taxed - not wages & salaries.
The never-actually-ratified Amendment XVI has become the basis of "income tax" code, which, as interpreted by the IRS and the courts except for a few cases soon after the Amendment was baselessly declared "in effect" , violates the Constitution:
- Article II prohibits "Capitation, or other direct tax ..." unless apportioned.
- Amendment IV prohibition of violations of privacy by government, since the tax code cannot be followed without the collection of extensive details about our personal, private lives, including our "papers", aka financial records.
- Amendment V protects us from being forced to testify against ourselves, and with Amendment IV, against investigations without direct knowledge by one or more individuals that we have apparently committed a crime, and are willing to swear to it. (See paragraph 52 & 53 of Hale vs. Henkel (1906) U.S. S.C. )
- Amendment V also says, "...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation." Money is property. How many people believe they are getting "just compensation" for the money that is taken from them by government, under threat of force?
- Amendment XIII banned slavery and involuntary servitude. Yet we trade part of our lives, time we can never get back - for wages or salaries; we exchange part of ourselves, our talents and abilities, to make a living. What else is taking, under threat of force, what we earn by trading our lives- the only means most have to support their UNalienable Right to Life, Liberty, and the property essential to those, but slavery or serfdom? Or theft?
Additionally, we are required to do the work, or pay to have it done, to figure out each year what the federal government will allow us to keep of the money we earned. Sounds like involuntary labor to me.
Inflation, which reduces the purchasing power of the dollars we work for, is also a kind of tax. The dollar has been reportedly devalued to about $.03 compared to its value in 1913.
Between all the various taxes we pay, plus tolls, license fees, etc we pay, it's been estimated that the average American only gets to keep about half of that.
It seems that we have been reduced to corporate/government serfs. Like serfs, we have to get permission to travel on the public roads (driver's licenses; automobile licenses), to marry (marriage license), to operate a business or practice the profession of our choice -even barbers & hair dressers (more licenses)!
Government is increasingly exercising ownership control over our lives, our bodies, and our children. Unless we wake up soon... we will be less than serfs.
Can you imagine if we didn't have a "conservative" Supreme Court? The democrats really don't have to pack the court since they are getting everything they want. Roberts is a disgrace to humanity and Barrett is simply a useless cunt.
SCOTUS throws us a couple of bones, but on the major rulings like mail -in ballots and birthright citizenship, they give the country a giant FU. It’s up to Congress, which means we’re screwed. All three branches of government are compromised with globalists. The coalition of Democrats and RINOs has run this country for over 100 years.
Again, Ketanji Brown Jackson is not a legitimate justice on SCOTUS. Exciting times ahead!
What a shock, it turns out the Great Replacement was always real, and now it's unstoppable.
The younger generation of men are about to "drop out" so fast it'll make your head spin.
Seems like all of the death threats worked.
Sadly, I think you are probably correct. Why, with all our government has been guilty of and concealed from the public, would we think threats would be beneath them?
Citizenship and liberty aren't synonymous. John Roberts is full of shit.
I am starting to think that there is no one in our government institutions that is willing or capable of doing the right thing regarding our constitution !!!
It’s just a free for all making up the rules as they go along.
"James Coney" Barrett turned out to be a real hot dog, voting with the libs all the time. You can always count on a so-called conservative to side with libs when it really counts, and esp. when we're counting votes. Take me back to Florida and the hanging chads, it was better then.
Looks like I'm celebrating 250 years since the country's funding and my 7th Great Grandfather, Clayborne Howard of Virginia, fighting in and surviving the American Revolution, by going tax exempt for the rest of the month, maybe the year. It's what the founders technically wanted seeing as the Articles of Confederation did t allow for the collection of taxes.
Lord, deliver us from these traitors - misery polluting Earth with their filth.
St. Joan of Arc, pray for us.
Why children of foreigners who are in the U.S. temporarily or illegally are not legit U.S. citizens, unless naturalized:
LEGISLATIVE INTENT: requires that the U.S. not claim as citizens babies born to anyone not in the country legally & permanently.
The Congressional Record shows:
-Congress wanted to give citizenship & rights to former slaves & their descendants.
-Congress was concerned that another Congress might revoke the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the first civil rights law enacted, which was written in response to the denial of citizenship & rights to Negros by certain States (before Amend 14, citizenship was only through the States).
-The intent was to incorporate that Act into the Constitution, while keeping the wording brief.
-Discussion about the proposed wording included eassurance that 'foreigners would not become citizens under Amend. XIV', nor the children of people in the U.S. temporarily - such as diplomats & sojourners / visitors.
“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens…” - Jacob Howard (1866), the main author of Amend.14.
Mattox vs. U.S. S.C. U.S. (1895)
"We [the court justices] are BOUND to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted." - "Bound" means they have no option.
The law regarding citizenship at the time the 14th Amendment was adopted:
The Civil Rights Act - 1866
"...all persons born in the U.S., AND NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FOREIGN POWER, excluding Indians not taxed [because Indians were citizens of their own nations], are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States;
and such citizens, of every race and color,... shall have the same right, in every State & Territory in the U.S., to:
make & enforce contracts, to sue, be parties & give evidence [in court], to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold & convey real & personal property, & to full & equal benefit of all laws & proceedings for the security of person & property, AS IS ENJOYED BY WHITE CITIZENS, & shall be subject to like punishment, pains, & penalties, & to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding."
https://loveman.sdsu.edu/docs/1866FirstCivilRightsAct.pdf
Amend. 14
"All persons born in the U.S., & SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF [not subject to the jurisdiction of any foreign power] , are citizens of the U.S. & of the State wherein they reside.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges & immunities of citizens of the U.S.;
nor shall any State deprive any [such] person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law;
nor deny to any [such] person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
THE PLAIN TEXT: Unless otherwise specified, all "persons" referred to IN THE SAME SENTENCE are the same status: citizens.
PURPOSE OF GOVERNMENT:
1st Paragraph, U.S. Constitution
"We the [actual] People [actually] of the United States, in order to... secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
...thereby constituting- creating - the government of our federation of "Free and Independent States". Government in these United States has no other purpose but to protect OUR Rights.
Not to grant Rights & give benefits to foreigners, or their children.
NATURAL LAW: Children have always belonged to their parents- except under slavery or serfdom. Children inherit their parents' genes, name, property & CITIZENSHIP.
It was 6-3 and Kavanaugh voted with the majority but stated it was for a different reason.
I’m not seeing his started reason anywhere ?
Seeing some vague reason on an AP story.
Knight of Columbus Kav is lost at sea.
Father McGivney, pray for us.
If they finally got their act together and declared Biden's and Obana's presidencies as the fake years of torture they were, then their Supreme Court appointments could be nullified.
And going back to correct history--- the illegal coup in 1913 which created the non Federal Reserve and its control of our money and the almost total devaluation of the dollar could also be reversed. The Supreme Puppets have just voted to extend the Commie Coup to wipe out the concept of legitimate citizens and legal voting. You go Supremies! And take a warning from Citizen Viligante regarding fair treatment of deserving judges!
Along with the creation of the partly federal Federal Reserve...
...also in 1913, Amendment XVI was declared to be "in effect" by the then Secretary of State - though it had never actually been properly ratified.
https://TheLawThatNeverWas.com
The public was told that 'not a hair of a working man's head' would be touched by Amendment XIV, and that only "income" such as interest and the like would be taxed - not wages & salaries.
The never-actually-ratified Amendment XVI has become the basis of "income tax" code, which, as interpreted by the IRS and the courts except for a few cases soon after the Amendment was baselessly declared "in effect" , violates the Constitution:
- Article II prohibits "Capitation, or other direct tax ..." unless apportioned.
- Amendment IV prohibition of violations of privacy by government, since the tax code cannot be followed without the collection of extensive details about our personal, private lives, including our "papers", aka financial records.
- Amendment V protects us from being forced to testify against ourselves, and with Amendment IV, against investigations without direct knowledge by one or more individuals that we have apparently committed a crime, and are willing to swear to it. (See paragraph 52 & 53 of Hale vs. Henkel (1906) U.S. S.C. )
- Amendment V also says, "...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation." Money is property. How many people believe they are getting "just compensation" for the money that is taken from them by government, under threat of force?
- Amendment XIII banned slavery and involuntary servitude. Yet we trade part of our lives, time we can never get back - for wages or salaries; we exchange part of ourselves, our talents and abilities, to make a living. What else is taking, under threat of force, what we earn by trading our lives- the only means most have to support their UNalienable Right to Life, Liberty, and the property essential to those, but slavery or serfdom? Or theft?
Additionally, we are required to do the work, or pay to have it done, to figure out each year what the federal government will allow us to keep of the money we earned. Sounds like involuntary labor to me.
Inflation, which reduces the purchasing power of the dollars we work for, is also a kind of tax. The dollar has been reportedly devalued to about $.03 compared to its value in 1913.
Between all the various taxes we pay, plus tolls, license fees, etc we pay, it's been estimated that the average American only gets to keep about half of that.
It seems that we have been reduced to corporate/government serfs. Like serfs, we have to get permission to travel on the public roads (driver's licenses; automobile licenses), to marry (marriage license), to operate a business or practice the profession of our choice -even barbers & hair dressers (more licenses)!
Government is increasingly exercising ownership control over our lives, our bodies, and our children. Unless we wake up soon... we will be less than serfs.
Can you imagine if we didn't have a "conservative" Supreme Court? The democrats really don't have to pack the court since they are getting everything they want. Roberts is a disgrace to humanity and Barrett is simply a useless cunt.
Disgusting 🤮. As a laborist during Covid , these illegals came to the hospital from just coming in over the border…. Some outcomes, not good .😪