For consideration - yes, Tate is way flawed human being who made loads of money off sexual exploitation - but for some reason (which I can’t fathom) he has stumbled on/resorted to a fairly conservative message (men need to be men, women women, don’t listen to deep state, etc.) Yet he is under investigation. Hunter Biden - well we have pi…
For consideration - yes, Tate is way flawed human being who made loads of money off sexual exploitation - but for some reason (which I can’t fathom) he has stumbled on/resorted to a fairly conservative message (men need to be men, women women, don’t listen to deep state, etc.) Yet he is under investigation. Hunter Biden - well we have pictures of him as well thanks to the laptop - no investigation of him. It’s the message the is getting people in trouble, not the deeds. That is what I take away from all this (and I do agree with some of Tate’s message, even if his life history is 100 percent opposite of what a good man should be). Yeah, we can tear down Tate if we want - but who, honestly, is hoping we do so?
Hey, you've obliquely raised a great point: is this what all this hubbub about Tate really about? Is it to deflect attention from Hunter Biden?
It's got some key ingredients. Tate's ostensibly "conservative" message (the "men are men, women are women" part, while down-playing Tate's obvious and stated hatred of women who he has denigrated and degraded) is the hook to bring on-side and gain sympathy with the right-minded who are either on the fence about him, or were reflexively against him. This is because he promotes himself as a pimp, after all, and religious conservatism is stereotypically anti- sex, drugs, and rock 'n' roll. It's primarily this demographic that wants the "Hunter Biden's Laptop" affair resolved. Which is understandable, I might add, because if it were properly resolved, so much filth on the Bidens and the entire situation in Ukraine would need to be officially acknowledged, which is why they're doing their damnedest to keep it all under wraps, and deflect attention away from it. Enter Andrew Tate. Thanks Tucker. Once again, dutifully doing his job.
I have a bit of time working for the govt. - first of all, it is incapable of the elegant; anything more sophisticated than “hulk smash” is literally beyond its abilities. But “hulk smash,” yeah - it can do that pretty well. Tucker highlighting Tate is pretty much after the fact - if anything it caught “the powers that be” actually employing “hulk smash.” The message is a threat, regardless of the messenger. And the “powers that be” are, well, kinda stupid honestly and limited in their ability to think and act with a degree of elegance that would hide their hand/influence. But, well, no body reads or thinks anymore, so I guess “hulk smash” works, so why change it.
"But, well, no body reads or thinks anymore, so I guess “hulk smash” works, so why change it."
This.
And nobody ever remembers anything anymore, and why would they need to? They have Google... No one remembers the f#c|<ery of AIDS, nor 9/11, nor the aftermath. No one remembers the names of the players, let alone what they said or did. It's all gone, swept away and memoryholed as the Overton window flies past. That's how they can pull a 9/11 or WMD or a COVID-19, and that's why they'll regroup and try again, when all the changes that COVID-19 was a pretext for are in place and fully-operating.
So who is driving the witch hunt - not actually hard to answer honestly, but perhaps a bit tad harder to “prove” its the message, vice the deed, that got Tate in trouble.
Actually, you just gave me an awesome idea. All men who are either in jail or have been punished for buying/paying for sex, should file a class action against DOJ and The POTUS based on the equal protection for selective application of the law.
For consideration - yes, Tate is way flawed human being who made loads of money off sexual exploitation - but for some reason (which I can’t fathom) he has stumbled on/resorted to a fairly conservative message (men need to be men, women women, don’t listen to deep state, etc.) Yet he is under investigation. Hunter Biden - well we have pictures of him as well thanks to the laptop - no investigation of him. It’s the message the is getting people in trouble, not the deeds. That is what I take away from all this (and I do agree with some of Tate’s message, even if his life history is 100 percent opposite of what a good man should be). Yeah, we can tear down Tate if we want - but who, honestly, is hoping we do so?
I think Andrew Tate and his brother are GREAT! It’s nice to hear a man talk like that!
And by the way, men will be men. Allow them to be!
Astonished by your comment.
😱
Hey, you've obliquely raised a great point: is this what all this hubbub about Tate really about? Is it to deflect attention from Hunter Biden?
It's got some key ingredients. Tate's ostensibly "conservative" message (the "men are men, women are women" part, while down-playing Tate's obvious and stated hatred of women who he has denigrated and degraded) is the hook to bring on-side and gain sympathy with the right-minded who are either on the fence about him, or were reflexively against him. This is because he promotes himself as a pimp, after all, and religious conservatism is stereotypically anti- sex, drugs, and rock 'n' roll. It's primarily this demographic that wants the "Hunter Biden's Laptop" affair resolved. Which is understandable, I might add, because if it were properly resolved, so much filth on the Bidens and the entire situation in Ukraine would need to be officially acknowledged, which is why they're doing their damnedest to keep it all under wraps, and deflect attention away from it. Enter Andrew Tate. Thanks Tucker. Once again, dutifully doing his job.
This really does stink of an operation.
I have a bit of time working for the govt. - first of all, it is incapable of the elegant; anything more sophisticated than “hulk smash” is literally beyond its abilities. But “hulk smash,” yeah - it can do that pretty well. Tucker highlighting Tate is pretty much after the fact - if anything it caught “the powers that be” actually employing “hulk smash.” The message is a threat, regardless of the messenger. And the “powers that be” are, well, kinda stupid honestly and limited in their ability to think and act with a degree of elegance that would hide their hand/influence. But, well, no body reads or thinks anymore, so I guess “hulk smash” works, so why change it.
Great comment, thanks for the refinements.
"But, well, no body reads or thinks anymore, so I guess “hulk smash” works, so why change it."
This.
And nobody ever remembers anything anymore, and why would they need to? They have Google... No one remembers the f#c|<ery of AIDS, nor 9/11, nor the aftermath. No one remembers the names of the players, let alone what they said or did. It's all gone, swept away and memoryholed as the Overton window flies past. That's how they can pull a 9/11 or WMD or a COVID-19, and that's why they'll regroup and try again, when all the changes that COVID-19 was a pretext for are in place and fully-operating.
By the way, did you see Biden mouth the toddler this week? And top it off with smelling her hair, of course.
Ladies and gentlemen, we present to you The President of The United States of America!
This is symptomatic of what the "land of the free" has been degenerated to. It's heartbreaking.
I'll give your comment a like for bringing this up, but not for the content. ;-)
I guess the Romainian police and judicial authorities are far less woke and politically corrupt than their US counterparts. That could explain a lot.
Agreed on this point
So who is driving the witch hunt - not actually hard to answer honestly, but perhaps a bit tad harder to “prove” its the message, vice the deed, that got Tate in trouble.
Which should scare the hell out of everyone.
Actually, you just gave me an awesome idea. All men who are either in jail or have been punished for buying/paying for sex, should file a class action against DOJ and The POTUS based on the equal protection for selective application of the law.