Last week this Substack published an article on the viral Andrew Tate interview:
Basically, everything Andrew Tate claimed about his business model (e.g. selling a course to lonely, out of shape and broke men called PHD which is the acronym for Pimpin’ Hoes Degree), and the validity of the charges brought against him were all egregious lies.
In Tate’s own words:
Tate’s message is strong, but he is after all a sleazy pathological hustler with the gift of gab.
Do NOT comply.
For consideration - yes, Tate is way flawed human being who made loads of money off sexual exploitation - but for some reason (which I can’t fathom) he has stumbled on/resorted to a fairly conservative message (men need to be men, women women, don’t listen to deep state, etc.) Yet he is under investigation. Hunter Biden - well we have pictures of him as well thanks to the laptop - no investigation of him. It’s the message the is getting people in trouble, not the deeds. That is what I take away from all this (and I do agree with some of Tate’s message, even if his life history is 100 percent opposite of what a good man should be). Yeah, we can tear down Tate if we want - but who, honestly, is hoping we do so?
I love Andrew Tate...He speaks TRUTH like it is...not like most people...They speak "their truths' and there no such f#@#ing thing as anybody;s truth,,,TRUTH IS JUST THAT...IT STANDS ALONE!!!