I have to wonder (well, perhaps have to, is a little strong - but I do wonder) if when citizen journalists (as opposed to corporate journalists) report things - for instance, the kid who exposed the fraud in Minnesota, don't just stir up other bigger problems.
Monica and Clinton - countries got bombed
Obama & pizza gate - more countries got bombed
Waltz and fraud - civil war is tried to be fomented
Trump & the files - pretty sure WWIII is in the offing as we build up in the middle east.
The major problem, as I see it, is that the average person feels they can do nothing to change things. And when they do want to do something about it - we get stuff live Jan 6th and Minnesota.
Trump came right out and said, you shouldn't take guns to a protest - by definition the second amendment is exactly for that specific moment.
yes there are a lot of weapons in the US but not that many people actually know how to make ammunition for them. and the military has got weapons that a gun like the average citizen has would be useless against.
On a different point - when they started shipping people to the US with Ebola - all I could think of was omc (oh my cow) they are TRYING to get a pandemic started.
Now we are looking at all the things people have done and wondering why no one get arrested...it's reality tv folks and we are the ones wearing red suits
I just wanted to set the record straight regarding:
“Larry Silverstein secured the lease for the WTC only weeks before the attack. He specifically negotiated an insurance policy covering "terrorism." He walked away with billions.”
The first sentence is true. The second and third sentences are not true at all.
I worked for one of the many reinsurers on the WTC policy. The policy did not cover “terrorism”. It wasn’t a ‘thing’ in the US at the time.
However, there is insurance law in 17/18 states called “fire following”. What this means is if the primary cause of a loss is not stated/covered in the policy but a fire ensues - then the resulting loss is covered.
60% of all losses on 9/11 would have been covered regardless of terrorism or not on the policy.
Silverstein DID NOT profit from the insurance policies. The policies were only written to cover ONE building worth $3.5B. No one ever thought he would have needed $7B in coverage - ever.
Silverstein had to continue paying the NY/NJ Port Authority for the leases (if he wanted to keep them) until the buildings were rebuilt. It was part of the agreement to insure their income stream.
Lastly, insurance policies are not lottery tickets. They are risk transfer vehicles to indemnify the insured. If he pocketed billions of dollars the insurance companies would know and he’d have been sued for insurance fraud.
With 9/11 one of my biggest questions is: What kind of weapon was used to turn the twin towers in to dust? It was NOT a controlled demolition. If it was a controlled demolition we would have seen 11 story piles of debris, and the bodies of all the people in the towers would have been recovered.
No weapon known or even theorized seems to work. Micronukes? Why did no one have radiation sickness afterwards, and why no radiation signatures? Directed energy weapons? Which kind: Microwave, laser, sonic, particle beam (which is only theoretical)?
We literally saw a 70 story "spire" (the steel core) of one of the buildings turn to dust in a few seconds after the rest of the building had fallen. What the hell does that?
EDIT: This is update 9.
Pretty fair to say this world is unbelievably corrupt and sick.
Please, Jesus, come 🙏 soon...
I have to wonder (well, perhaps have to, is a little strong - but I do wonder) if when citizen journalists (as opposed to corporate journalists) report things - for instance, the kid who exposed the fraud in Minnesota, don't just stir up other bigger problems.
Monica and Clinton - countries got bombed
Obama & pizza gate - more countries got bombed
Waltz and fraud - civil war is tried to be fomented
Trump & the files - pretty sure WWIII is in the offing as we build up in the middle east.
The major problem, as I see it, is that the average person feels they can do nothing to change things. And when they do want to do something about it - we get stuff live Jan 6th and Minnesota.
Trump came right out and said, you shouldn't take guns to a protest - by definition the second amendment is exactly for that specific moment.
yes there are a lot of weapons in the US but not that many people actually know how to make ammunition for them. and the military has got weapons that a gun like the average citizen has would be useless against.
On a different point - when they started shipping people to the US with Ebola - all I could think of was omc (oh my cow) they are TRYING to get a pandemic started.
Now we are looking at all the things people have done and wondering why no one get arrested...it's reality tv folks and we are the ones wearing red suits
I just wanted to set the record straight regarding:
“Larry Silverstein secured the lease for the WTC only weeks before the attack. He specifically negotiated an insurance policy covering "terrorism." He walked away with billions.”
The first sentence is true. The second and third sentences are not true at all.
I worked for one of the many reinsurers on the WTC policy. The policy did not cover “terrorism”. It wasn’t a ‘thing’ in the US at the time.
However, there is insurance law in 17/18 states called “fire following”. What this means is if the primary cause of a loss is not stated/covered in the policy but a fire ensues - then the resulting loss is covered.
60% of all losses on 9/11 would have been covered regardless of terrorism or not on the policy.
Silverstein DID NOT profit from the insurance policies. The policies were only written to cover ONE building worth $3.5B. No one ever thought he would have needed $7B in coverage - ever.
Silverstein had to continue paying the NY/NJ Port Authority for the leases (if he wanted to keep them) until the buildings were rebuilt. It was part of the agreement to insure their income stream.
Lastly, insurance policies are not lottery tickets. They are risk transfer vehicles to indemnify the insured. If he pocketed billions of dollars the insurance companies would know and he’d have been sued for insurance fraud.
So much here!!!!
Agreed! A lot to take in.
With 9/11 one of my biggest questions is: What kind of weapon was used to turn the twin towers in to dust? It was NOT a controlled demolition. If it was a controlled demolition we would have seen 11 story piles of debris, and the bodies of all the people in the towers would have been recovered.
No weapon known or even theorized seems to work. Micronukes? Why did no one have radiation sickness afterwards, and why no radiation signatures? Directed energy weapons? Which kind: Microwave, laser, sonic, particle beam (which is only theoretical)?
We literally saw a 70 story "spire" (the steel core) of one of the buildings turn to dust in a few seconds after the rest of the building had fallen. What the hell does that?
Stop bleating. Start biting. Or the slaughter will continue. Worse to come.
Criminal Syndicate
Too big to fail !!!
And we’re not talking about the banking system.