Don't forget they've been attacking and destroying masculinity since at least the 1960s, perhaps before because feminism is a Marxist led. movement - the point being they've been psychologically killing and stunting the development of alpha males - that's why the Andrew Tate phenomenon is so strong - he's teaching men to be men. And the …
Don't forget they've been attacking and destroying masculinity since at least the 1960s, perhaps before because feminism is a Marxist led. movement - the point being they've been psychologically killing and stunting the development of alpha males - that's why the Andrew Tate phenomenon is so strong - he's teaching men to be men. And the Davos globalist cabal hates it. One male type they didn't get, the Sigmas! I'm a Sigma!
I was a young child when the 60's feminist revolution came along. If I'm not mistaken, I read that it was Rockefeller's idea. It was to cause a breakdown of the family unit, where the wife as homemaker would have to get a job, with the increasing taxes, increase in divorces, etc. Curse that evil man.
Don't forget they've been attacking and destroying masculinity since at least the 1960s, perhaps before because feminism is a Marxist led. movement - the point being they've been psychologically killing and stunting the development of alpha males - that's why the Andrew Tate phenomenon is so strong - he's teaching men to be men. And the Davos globalist cabal hates it. One male type they didn't get, the Sigmas! I'm a Sigma!
I was a young child when the 60's feminist revolution came along. If I'm not mistaken, I read that it was Rockefeller's idea. It was to cause a breakdown of the family unit, where the wife as homemaker would have to get a job, with the increasing taxes, increase in divorces, etc. Curse that evil man.
Plus......children wouldn't have the care of moms staying home. They would all be indoctrinated in the "care system".