14 Comments
User's avatar
Scott's avatar

This line I find hilarious and enraging: "UKHSA also claimed that publishing the numbers could “lead to misinformation” or impact vaccine uptake." Ya think? Guess what, monsters. My wife and I, already deeply pharma skeptic before the covid scam (never getting flu vaxxes, for example), will NEVER get ANY injectable biologic EVER. Or statins. Or any drug still under patent. Gotta do your own research, folks. Your docs rarely know what's going on.

Expand full comment
Occam's avatar

More results of the feminization of the west. Where feelings matter more than data, and a disregard for the importance of actual truth.

"People might be uncomfortable, so let's protect them"

The nanny state in action.

Expand full comment
Nancy Parsons's avatar

I think it's more about covering their asses than it is about feelings. The "feelings" part of their motives is a cover for control. They don't want riots, much less civil war, and they fear they will get both.

Expand full comment
Markus's avatar

Exactly! It's CYA situation because they know people would rise against them in a very violent way if they ever find out they've been poisoned and then lied to.

Expand full comment
Nancy Parsons's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
Tom Childs's avatar

Of course the agency is correct that releasing the data could lead to distress or anger and reduce vaccine uptake. But what about the people who should know about the potential dangers of the vaccines before deciding to be vaccinated? Obviously, agency heads are more concerned about the potential for prosecutions than protecting bereaved or future bereaved.

Expand full comment
ShastaBetty's avatar

The article excuses them not releasing this damaging information is because"releasing the figures could cause “distress or anger” - DUH! It also would cause people to not get the jab and harm their profits!! And just maybe my sister, good friend, and many others would not have died!

Expand full comment
Wolf-Steppen's avatar

We sure are in the "Slough of Despond", aren't we? (Referring to Pilgrim's Progress.) The mass-insanity is taking over more and more, and most people don't want to face that that much is out of the ordinary. The "New Normal" takes over in stages, again and again. The masses become acclimated to, and assimilated into, the updates of the New Normal. People can be mass-murdering them, but it doesn't get through to them, they have been so successfully programmed to go along with whatever comes down the pike, even if it leads to their heads on spikes, figuratively or literally. If it's not going on right in front of their doorstep, or on it, "it isn't happening", "it doesn't exist", "it wasn't part of the New Normal update(s), so there is no truth to it". Life on the new "Planet Despond", where people are increasingly dropping dead, or dying in their sleep, all around them, but people talk themselves into falsely believing that the powers-that-shouldn't-be are on top of things, and will take care of it. There must be a justified explanation for it, and it has nothing to do with the "vaccines". The deaths continue to rise? What of it? It must be being caused by "climate change", "the climate 'crisis'", aka global warming; and, thus, the "useless eater", "dumb, stupid animals", that most of humankind (allegedly) are, must die. There must be a good reason for it. Perhaps we should just obey the government, for they know best, and go to assisted suicide clinics and get it over with. That's not delusional, or anything but sensible. That's not mass-insanity, or mass-psychosis, it's just trusting our trustworthy government. Don't get your panties in a bunch, we're on the road to salvation through death, don't you know that?!

[Full disclosure: this is sarcasm.]

Expand full comment
Roger Beal's avatar

These stats explain why herr Starmer's government does not require north African Muslim immigrants to get jabbed ... only native UK palefaces are vaxxed.

Expand full comment
Chill The Monk Out's avatar

Hope you don’t mind me adding some flesh to the bone. From the person who made the FOI https://open.substack.com/pub/drclarecraig/p/the-outcome-of-the-icoukhsa-foi-court?r=21ag4m&utm_medium=ios

Expand full comment
Eccentrik's avatar

lol reminds me of their "vaccine hesitancy," because hey, we don't want ppl being hesitant about something that will injure or kill them, amirite?

Expand full comment
Chill The Monk Out's avatar

Hope you don’t mind me adding some flesh to the bone. From the person who made the FOI https://open.substack.com/pub/drclarecraig/p/the-outcome-of-the-icoukhsa-foi-court?r=21ag4m&utm_medium=ios

Expand full comment
Linda Ferland's avatar

There's been so much notoriety about the bad effects/deaths from Covid that these jackasses are now, trying to cover their buts--just like in the US. They don't give a Crap about the damage done. It's way too late for these uncaring inhumans to justify any of their opinions/excuses/lies!

Expand full comment
Sounds Like Nonsense's avatar

Higher vaccination rates correlated with a stronger increase in excess mortality and a smaller decline in COVID-19 deaths and fatality rates, even after adjusting for previous mortality rates and time-independent confounders. This robust finding underscores the need for urgent investigation of potential unintended effects of vaccinations or other previously neglected mortality factors.

Regional patterns of excess mortality in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic a state-level analysis

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.250790

Expand full comment