Actually NO. Tate himself said he did not make much money fighting and that is why he had to go into the porn industry. He also said he dealt drugs for a time. He had an online Pimp School that men and boys had to pay around 5,000 dollars to join where he taught them how to run a porn ring. Clips are available online by men who "leaked" …
Actually NO. Tate himself said he did not make much money fighting and that is why he had to go into the porn industry. He also said he dealt drugs for a time. He had an online Pimp School that men and boys had to pay around 5,000 dollars to join where he taught them how to run a porn ring. Clips are available online by men who "leaked" them. He openly laid out his strategy for acquiring girls and women, deceiving them, getting them to live with him (and not being allowed to go out on their own), and doing online porn in which he deceptively took most of the money earned. He laid all this out clearly. He also said he chose to live in Romania because their rape laws are lax and the system is so corrupt it's easy to bribe. He also said he gave thousands to the Romanian Orthodox Church every month in donations because the Church is very powerful in Romania and he needed powerful friends there. He also talked about his Romanian Mafia connections and gambling casinos.
The thing with Tate is that he spelled all of this out very clearly online. Then when Romanian officials took it all seriously and attempted to investigate, he backtracked. He's a self-snitcher.
I appreciate your response and detail of your research. I haven’t seen these confessions of his on-line or otherwise, so I’m ignorant of such. As I said, “This is my view of this excellent video of Tucker interviewing Andrew Tate.” Period. I spoke about the interview, not what may or may not have appeared on web. In my view, he came across forthrightly, direct, without hesitations, or signs of duplicity, no detected deceit clues, such as eye movement, being vague, fidgeting, etc. But I do respect and appreciate your broader view. Thanks again for the response.
He never addresses any of this in interviews, even when asked. He always goes off on other things like "emasculation of men" or "the matrix" or whatever. People fall for it.
I know! It's ridiculous how Tater and his Tots keep saying, "no woman's come forward with allegations" when several have. Criminal Lawyer Bruce Rivers has several videos analyzing Tate's indictments. They are all worth a listen. Here's one; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs5b04hnfMQ
Actually NO. Tate himself said he did not make much money fighting and that is why he had to go into the porn industry. He also said he dealt drugs for a time. He had an online Pimp School that men and boys had to pay around 5,000 dollars to join where he taught them how to run a porn ring. Clips are available online by men who "leaked" them. He openly laid out his strategy for acquiring girls and women, deceiving them, getting them to live with him (and not being allowed to go out on their own), and doing online porn in which he deceptively took most of the money earned. He laid all this out clearly. He also said he chose to live in Romania because their rape laws are lax and the system is so corrupt it's easy to bribe. He also said he gave thousands to the Romanian Orthodox Church every month in donations because the Church is very powerful in Romania and he needed powerful friends there. He also talked about his Romanian Mafia connections and gambling casinos.
The thing with Tate is that he spelled all of this out very clearly online. Then when Romanian officials took it all seriously and attempted to investigate, he backtracked. He's a self-snitcher.
I appreciate your response and detail of your research. I haven’t seen these confessions of his on-line or otherwise, so I’m ignorant of such. As I said, “This is my view of this excellent video of Tucker interviewing Andrew Tate.” Period. I spoke about the interview, not what may or may not have appeared on web. In my view, he came across forthrightly, direct, without hesitations, or signs of duplicity, no detected deceit clues, such as eye movement, being vague, fidgeting, etc. But I do respect and appreciate your broader view. Thanks again for the response.
He never addresses any of this in interviews, even when asked. He always goes off on other things like "emasculation of men" or "the matrix" or whatever. People fall for it.
I know! It's ridiculous how Tater and his Tots keep saying, "no woman's come forward with allegations" when several have. Criminal Lawyer Bruce Rivers has several videos analyzing Tate's indictments. They are all worth a listen. Here's one; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs5b04hnfMQ