I don't want to rain on your parade, but as a media personality (albeit more so in the Alt space), Andrew Tate needs to be treated with circumspection.
Indeed with respect to all these supposed rebellious and subversive media celebrities, bear in mind that in order for the fiction of "rule of law" and "democracy" t…
I don't want to rain on your parade, but as a media personality (albeit more so in the Alt space), Andrew Tate needs to be treated with circumspection.
Indeed with respect to all these supposed rebellious and subversive media celebrities, bear in mind that in order for the fiction of "rule of law" and "democracy" to keep the people believing that the world is ultimately benevolent and favorable towards them, and to suppress any incipient awareness that it is completely managed and controlled by the few oiler-banker oligarchs, Power needs to allow a few "I speak for the people!" voices to become prominent.
Tucker Carlson, for his part in this, is a an edgy media "dissident" with hand-picked targets for his rants, who rallies the masses and takes them nowhere. On purpose.
Everyone needs to be treated with circumspection; Hero balls are a big part of what got us here and continue to play into the control grid psyop as the bars close around us all. Agree about Tuck but didn't think this piece was about him. Rather the systematic emasculation of men in "first world/industrialized nations" while a parallel strategy of manufactured migration of hyper-masculine "third world" replacement population is systematically being unleashed, with barely a whisper of concern for humanity much less women, children and now the growing demographic of trans who will all be vulnerable and victimized like never before. Everywhere.
Women are not victims by nature but are only safe when men are men; of principle and physical strength.
Thankfully my sons think like Tate and his brother, and I relate to the pride their mother feels.
"Hero balls" - I don't understand why that has become the euphemism that it has, but I get the gist of it from the rest of your statement - and I agree. I think you are accurately reading into what is unfolding, and you have articulated it concisely.
"Agree about Tuck but didn't think this piece was about him."
I didn't originally intend that my comment would be about Tucker Carlson, but it did end up that way. I suppose I was highlighting how a Tucker Carlson operates in lending his platform to others that might reinforce a message, that such an operation may well be fifth column.
I agree with the rest of your comment, including what Andrew Tate says about the emasculation of men. But I mainly wanted to relay the inference that Andrew Tate, and in particular his deceased father, and the circumstances surrounding both are positively redolent of Intelligence programming.
"Women are not victims by nature but are only safe when men are men; of principle and physical strength."
This is undeniably, irrefutably true and in contempt of the corrosion and inversion of reality of the cultural Marxism at play.
"... with barely a whisper of concern for humanity much less women, children and now the growing demographic of trans who will all be vulnerable and victimized like never before. Everywhere."
The dissolution and atomization of society, the elimination of traditional natural cultural identities from which society may gain a sense of purpose and with which it might resist usurpation and subjugation by an all-powerful, all-meaning corporate-controlled State - these are (at least some of) the consequences of the derangements being administered upon us.
I have great respect for you and I applaud you for the courage and sensibility you have inculcated in your sons.
"Rather the systematic emasculation of men in "first world/industrialized nations"
-- Have you seen Tater Tot's music videos in his shorty-shorty, tighty-whitey shorts and the walk he sways? Emasculation is an understatement.
"while a parallel strategy of manufactured migration of hyper-masculine "third world"
-- Speaking of Muslims, Tater Tot took his shahada last autumn. He is all about that migration and the Islamicization of the West. Allah Hu Akbar!
"Thankfully my sons think like Tate and his brother, and I relate to the pride their mother feels."
-- Are they reading the Quran as well? Have they paid money to join his online "Hustler's University", "War Room" or "PhD" ("Pimping Hos Degree) where he teaches how to lure women into the porn industry, which he says is how he made his money after fighting (which didn't pay well)?
1. God created everything, which includes angels and demons (Colossians 1: 15-16).
2. Satan is an angel who is subordinate to God (Job 1: 6-7).
3. Jesus is the son of God. In the book of Job 1:6; 2:1 it seems that the sons of God are angels, both good and bad. God speaks to Satan who was among them. The context does not necessitate the position that the sons of God were only the wicked angels. Later in the book, Job 38:7, it says the sons of God shouted for joy. This seems to be a reference to the good angels.
In the remaining occurrences of the term, they are all in the New Testament and they are speaking of the good people, the godly who have trusted in God.
So, the term sons of God has two basic meanings. It refers to the angels, both good and bad, in the Old Testament. But in the New Testament, the phrase refers to believers.
Genesis 6:2
that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose.
Genesis 6:4
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
Job 38:7
When the morning stars sang together
And all the sons of God shouted for joy?
Job 1:6
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.
Job 2:1
Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them to present himself before the Lord.
So, Jesus is the son of God, the angels, both good and bad are the sons of God, Satan was created a good angel (and named Lucifer), but in being an angel, he is the son of God. Two sons of the same father are brothers, so Lucifer was Jesus' old man's other son.
I don't want to rain on your parade, but as a media personality (albeit more so in the Alt space), Andrew Tate needs to be treated with circumspection.
https://bombthrower.com/king-of-the-simps/
Indeed with respect to all these supposed rebellious and subversive media celebrities, bear in mind that in order for the fiction of "rule of law" and "democracy" to keep the people believing that the world is ultimately benevolent and favorable towards them, and to suppress any incipient awareness that it is completely managed and controlled by the few oiler-banker oligarchs, Power needs to allow a few "I speak for the people!" voices to become prominent.
Tucker Carlson, for his part in this, is a an edgy media "dissident" with hand-picked targets for his rants, who rallies the masses and takes them nowhere. On purpose.
Everyone needs to be treated with circumspection; Hero balls are a big part of what got us here and continue to play into the control grid psyop as the bars close around us all. Agree about Tuck but didn't think this piece was about him. Rather the systematic emasculation of men in "first world/industrialized nations" while a parallel strategy of manufactured migration of hyper-masculine "third world" replacement population is systematically being unleashed, with barely a whisper of concern for humanity much less women, children and now the growing demographic of trans who will all be vulnerable and victimized like never before. Everywhere.
Women are not victims by nature but are only safe when men are men; of principle and physical strength.
Thankfully my sons think like Tate and his brother, and I relate to the pride their mother feels.
"Hero balls" - I don't understand why that has become the euphemism that it has, but I get the gist of it from the rest of your statement - and I agree. I think you are accurately reading into what is unfolding, and you have articulated it concisely.
"Agree about Tuck but didn't think this piece was about him."
I didn't originally intend that my comment would be about Tucker Carlson, but it did end up that way. I suppose I was highlighting how a Tucker Carlson operates in lending his platform to others that might reinforce a message, that such an operation may well be fifth column.
I agree with the rest of your comment, including what Andrew Tate says about the emasculation of men. But I mainly wanted to relay the inference that Andrew Tate, and in particular his deceased father, and the circumstances surrounding both are positively redolent of Intelligence programming.
"Women are not victims by nature but are only safe when men are men; of principle and physical strength."
This is undeniably, irrefutably true and in contempt of the corrosion and inversion of reality of the cultural Marxism at play.
"... with barely a whisper of concern for humanity much less women, children and now the growing demographic of trans who will all be vulnerable and victimized like never before. Everywhere."
The dissolution and atomization of society, the elimination of traditional natural cultural identities from which society may gain a sense of purpose and with which it might resist usurpation and subjugation by an all-powerful, all-meaning corporate-controlled State - these are (at least some of) the consequences of the derangements being administered upon us.
I have great respect for you and I applaud you for the courage and sensibility you have inculcated in your sons.
"Rather the systematic emasculation of men in "first world/industrialized nations"
-- Have you seen Tater Tot's music videos in his shorty-shorty, tighty-whitey shorts and the walk he sways? Emasculation is an understatement.
"while a parallel strategy of manufactured migration of hyper-masculine "third world"
-- Speaking of Muslims, Tater Tot took his shahada last autumn. He is all about that migration and the Islamicization of the West. Allah Hu Akbar!
"Thankfully my sons think like Tate and his brother, and I relate to the pride their mother feels."
-- Are they reading the Quran as well? Have they paid money to join his online "Hustler's University", "War Room" or "PhD" ("Pimping Hos Degree) where he teaches how to lure women into the porn industry, which he says is how he made his money after fighting (which didn't pay well)?
"Even Lucifer believed in Jesus. "
Well, Lucifer was - allegedly - Jesus' old man's other son, so there's that.
Except he wasn’t.
There’s that.
Oh? Well then, explain why not when:
1. God created everything, which includes angels and demons (Colossians 1: 15-16).
2. Satan is an angel who is subordinate to God (Job 1: 6-7).
3. Jesus is the son of God. In the book of Job 1:6; 2:1 it seems that the sons of God are angels, both good and bad. God speaks to Satan who was among them. The context does not necessitate the position that the sons of God were only the wicked angels. Later in the book, Job 38:7, it says the sons of God shouted for joy. This seems to be a reference to the good angels.
In the remaining occurrences of the term, they are all in the New Testament and they are speaking of the good people, the godly who have trusted in God.
So, the term sons of God has two basic meanings. It refers to the angels, both good and bad, in the Old Testament. But in the New Testament, the phrase refers to believers.
Genesis 6:2
that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose.
Genesis 6:4
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
Job 38:7
When the morning stars sang together
And all the sons of God shouted for joy?
Job 1:6
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.
Job 2:1
Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them to present himself before the Lord.
So, Jesus is the son of God, the angels, both good and bad are the sons of God, Satan was created a good angel (and named Lucifer), but in being an angel, he is the son of God. Two sons of the same father are brothers, so Lucifer was Jesus' old man's other son.
Q.E.D.