Internal bickering doesn't help our cause, I think it's better to call a virus as a gene fragment or peptide or a toxic gene fragment. Therefore spike proteins, venom proteins and you name it, are all under the classification of really small things considered as bioweapons. The one error I think the non virus people make is assuming th…
Internal bickering doesn't help our cause, I think it's better to call a virus as a gene fragment or peptide or a toxic gene fragment. Therefore spike proteins, venom proteins and you name it, are all under the classification of really small things considered as bioweapons. The one error I think the non virus people make is assuming the method of transmission must be from mucous or lung fluid. Would it not be the breath, the air to be sampled? Or the microflora of the skin that the infected may be depositing on their environment?
Internal bickering doesn't help our cause, I think it's better to call a virus as a gene fragment or peptide or a toxic gene fragment. Therefore spike proteins, venom proteins and you name it, are all under the classification of really small things considered as bioweapons. The one error I think the non virus people make is assuming the method of transmission must be from mucous or lung fluid. Would it not be the breath, the air to be sampled? Or the microflora of the skin that the infected may be depositing on their environment?
Yes, correct
Agreed Marius, TY