You know, from the looks of it, this "injectable slow kill bioweapon" might not be so slow after all. Even if there isn't some prion disease activating graphene "switch" inside of it.
Of course what if there is (a prion 5G graphene dioxide "trigger")?
Then all this myriad of other damaging and disease causing side effects including immu…
You know, from the looks of it, this "injectable slow kill bioweapon" might not be so slow after all. Even if there isn't some prion disease activating graphene "switch" inside of it.
Of course what if there is (a prion 5G graphene dioxide "trigger")?
Then all this myriad of other damaging and disease causing side effects including immune system dysfunction, CNS damage, heart inflammation/damage, clotting disorders, autoimmune reactions, reproductive errors/lack of function, metabolic abnormalities, and such are all just a "wilderness of mirrors" to occupy investigators instead of them looking into the real "purpose" of this bioweapon.
There was a study being done on the results of ivermectin treatment post vaccine both with and without other treatments. Haven't seen any results at this time as far as I know.
Now, a European pathologist, don't remember his name, made the suggestion of a every 21 to 28 day "maintenance" dose of ivermectin, not so much as to treat the vaccine spike protein, although he admitted some evidence supports such use, but to prevent further variant infection and exacerbations of immune system dysfunction. His theory was that further infections with additional variants was necessary to "maximize" the toxic effects of the vaccine, especially in view of what unknown DNA meditated changes may occur with these later variants, in other words, this is a multipart bio-weapon, of which both boosters and variants are required to construct the "final package."
If this sounds complicated it is because it absolutely is and seems that every few days we encounter more data that suggests we have no idea what a "final package" might look like.
You know, from the looks of it, this "injectable slow kill bioweapon" might not be so slow after all. Even if there isn't some prion disease activating graphene "switch" inside of it.
Of course what if there is (a prion 5G graphene dioxide "trigger")?
Then all this myriad of other damaging and disease causing side effects including immune system dysfunction, CNS damage, heart inflammation/damage, clotting disorders, autoimmune reactions, reproductive errors/lack of function, metabolic abnormalities, and such are all just a "wilderness of mirrors" to occupy investigators instead of them looking into the real "purpose" of this bioweapon.
Frightening thought- especially for those of us who believed (trusted) we had to get the shots - 2 - but wised up before THE BOOSTER!
take ivermectin and product like this to clean up the "vax" damage: www.virex.health
There was a study being done on the results of ivermectin treatment post vaccine both with and without other treatments. Haven't seen any results at this time as far as I know.
Now, a European pathologist, don't remember his name, made the suggestion of a every 21 to 28 day "maintenance" dose of ivermectin, not so much as to treat the vaccine spike protein, although he admitted some evidence supports such use, but to prevent further variant infection and exacerbations of immune system dysfunction. His theory was that further infections with additional variants was necessary to "maximize" the toxic effects of the vaccine, especially in view of what unknown DNA meditated changes may occur with these later variants, in other words, this is a multipart bio-weapon, of which both boosters and variants are required to construct the "final package."
If this sounds complicated it is because it absolutely is and seems that every few days we encounter more data that suggests we have no idea what a "final package" might look like.
not complicated whatsoever. makes good sense.
Whew! A work in progress, is it not?
I agree that taking it prophylactically can’t be a bad idea. Thanks!
Absolutely not a bad idea, especially given the variants and the stated intention to develop an "infectious vaccine."
"So, Iet's say you want to change the human body.
You want to fix a mistake.
You want to repair something, improve something.
Well, if you're going to reprogram human genetic materiaI, you need a deIivery system, and nothing works better than virus.
It's Iike a suitcase.
You pack in genetic mutation, infect the body and the vector unIoads into the target cells.
But getting it where you want it, how you want it, is the nightmare."
-Bourne Supremacy
Need to wake up from this very bad dream…….