The issue here is try explaining to the judge the following:
Whereas: “State” is a Federal term exclusively; and
Whereas: For purposes of tax under Title 26 U.S.C., “State” is defined in a political sense and
means the body politic of the District of Columbia and no other thing (supra, paragraph 39); and
Whereas: None of the 50 commonweal…
The issue here is try explaining to the judge the following:
Whereas: “State” is a Federal term exclusively; and
Whereas: For purposes of tax under Title 26 U.S.C., “State” is defined in a political sense and
means the body politic of the District of Columbia and no other thing (supra, paragraph 39); and
Whereas: None of the 50 commonwealths united by and under authority of the Constitution and
admitted into the Union is a State, as Congress define “State” in Title 26 U.S.C.; and
Whereas: There is no definition of “state” in any statute of the 50 aforesaid commonwealths that
comprehends any such commonwealth as a state; and
Whereas: Any and all official, governmental use of “State” means the body politic of the District
of Columbia (and no other thing); and
Whereas: The government of every commonwealth united by and under authority of the
Constitution and admitted into the Union uses the Federal term “State” in its official title, i.e., State
of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of California, State of
Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of
Hawaii, State of Idaho, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Iowa, State of Kansas, State of
Kentucky, State of Louisiana, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Massachusetts, State of
Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Mississippi, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of
Nebraska, State of Nevada, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico,
State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio, State of
Oklahoma, State of Oregon, State of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of South
Carolina, State of South Dakota, State of Tennessee, State of Texas, State of Utah, State of
Vermont, State of Virginia, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin, and
State of Wyoming; and
Whereas: Any government use of “State” means the body politic of the District of Columbia; e.g.,
“State of Alabama” means the body politic of the District of Columbia of Alabama,
I will review your bonus links later. Basically taxes are a sleight of hand under color of law, and there is no possible legal means of imposing direct and un-apportioned taxation in an state outside the Sate of District of Columbia which is not one of the states of the union by design.
The issue here is try explaining to the judge the following:
Whereas: “State” is a Federal term exclusively; and
Whereas: For purposes of tax under Title 26 U.S.C., “State” is defined in a political sense and
means the body politic of the District of Columbia and no other thing (supra, paragraph 39); and
Whereas: None of the 50 commonwealths united by and under authority of the Constitution and
admitted into the Union is a State, as Congress define “State” in Title 26 U.S.C.; and
Whereas: There is no definition of “state” in any statute of the 50 aforesaid commonwealths that
comprehends any such commonwealth as a state; and
Whereas: Any and all official, governmental use of “State” means the body politic of the District
of Columbia (and no other thing); and
Whereas: The government of every commonwealth united by and under authority of the
Constitution and admitted into the Union uses the Federal term “State” in its official title, i.e., State
of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, State of California, State of
Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of
Hawaii, State of Idaho, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Iowa, State of Kansas, State of
Kentucky, State of Louisiana, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Massachusetts, State of
Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Mississippi, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of
Nebraska, State of Nevada, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico,
State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio, State of
Oklahoma, State of Oregon, State of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of South
Carolina, State of South Dakota, State of Tennessee, State of Texas, State of Utah, State of
Vermont, State of Virginia, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin, and
State of Wyoming; and
Whereas: Any government use of “State” means the body politic of the District of Columbia; e.g.,
“State of Alabama” means the body politic of the District of Columbia of Alabama,
I will review your bonus links later. Basically taxes are a sleight of hand under color of law, and there is no possible legal means of imposing direct and un-apportioned taxation in an state outside the Sate of District of Columbia which is not one of the states of the union by design.