188 Comments
User's avatar
Dani Richards's avatar

I have dozens of friends and neighbors who work (or have worked) for NIH. I live nearby. Here is what I will say about the qualities of these friends, from what I have observed:

- they are all highly intelligent, most with multiple or advanced degrees. Some of them are retired after lifelong careers at NIH. Others have been there for 5-10 years.

- they are all very nice, fun-loving people (not weirdos, though they might be nerds)

- they like their colleagues (friends with each other outside of work) and have professional respect for each other.

- they are all very compartmentalized in what they do, without fully realizing (not seeing the big picture), and since they themselves are experts and trust their expert colleagues, they tend to trust all "vetted" experts.

- my NIH friends all have well-intentioned motivations and would be horrified to think that what they do for a living causes harm to others. Cancer researchers are trying to find cures, geneticists are trying to find ways to help through gene therapy, etc. Procurement officers are trying to make sure they have state of the art equipment to be able to help solve public health problems. Security guards are helping to protect the wonderful people who work there. Etc. These are kind-hearted people who want to do good.

- they make good money on a government salary and feel that their salaries are well-deserved, and besides, this is a high-cost area to live in, right?

- all of them took the jabs, wore the masks and encouraged me to do so. When I told them the truth: "it is contraindicated for me; I might die, so I am unable to get one" they were sympathetic and did not shun me.

- they are all of a compliant type of nature (respect experts and authority and don't go outside of their lane). They would all take these jabs and wear the masks to protect others.

- they are in the same self-reinforcing bubble with each other, in and outside of work. The support and validation by the group is very important to them (personally and career-wise).

- they are friends with me because I have met them through social channels and even though I'm not a scientist, I like to talk science with them.

- that last bit is sorta interesting to me: I will share scientific studies with them on such things as the efficacy of masking, the "mysterious" increase in myocarditis, ivermectin and so forth, and they will share narrative-reinforcing studies back at me in response.

- As far as I am aware, I do not know any whistleblowers among them.

Queen Hotchibobo's avatar

They are all the compliant type.

That right there is what makes them dangerous since they are working for the evil type.

John H.'s avatar

In my personal experience, most of these people are poorly grounded in philosophy and theology as well as in basic elements of logic which makes such people very dangerous as they cannot see the big picture (metaphysical truths/constructs). They are very easy to capture and be tucked away in their circumscribed area of expertise.

Dani Richards's avatar

The government agencies also have a very strong push for diversity, equity and inclusion goals. I am astounded at the number of HR trainings my friends receive, to assist them in their compliance with the transgender agenda, for example. This is a relentless push.

Since I do not receive similar trainings, the conversations between us get very interesting on these topics. They think I'm a bit uneducated or even (!!) "far right" in my thinking, when I merely express that I'd rather not have a biological male undressing in the locker room next to me. In order to preserve our friendship, we can only "agree to disagree" and I let them know that "well, obviously I have not BEEN TRAINED in your way of thinking about this....."

ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Goodness me--'trained in your way of thinking'. Nice come back, although they no doubt miss the irony.

ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

I just tell tptb that these little modules are against my religion (they are) and if they try and force me to do them I will sue. So far it's worked.

Peter 🔒's avatar

DEI needs to DIE!!! ☠

It is propaganda designed to create Workforce Chaos and a weakened output from companies. This will cause DELAYED DEEP ECONOMIC Issues.

Oh, that's already underway.

Yay!

John H.'s avatar

I'm now too old to experience this in a workplace. It would be completely demoralizing, and I empathize with those who still have to deal with it.

Dani Richards's avatar

From what I have learned about psychopaths, they prey on people who have these two characteristics: 1) they are good people (not sly wrongdoers but morally straight), and 2) they DO good (they put their well-meaningness into action to be helpful).

I would also add, from what you mention above: they are trusting (because they themselves are trustworthy) and that makes them compliant, usually.

So what I'm thinking is that it is exactly this type of person who, once they discover they have been bamboozled (especially if they have been used as a tool of evil, all the while thinking they are being helpful) -- they can become personally destroyed (overcome by all sorts of emotions: guilt, self-recrimination, shame, outrage, fury) -- and this is also the type of person (the one who is good, who likes to be helpful) who will become a whistleblower.

This is why good people who are used as tools by evil are kept in their compartments and reinforcement bubbles. Many of these people are so in the dark and "good" that they would never even ever steal a pen from their employer. High moral code. Absolutely brainwashed and oblivious. (and absolutely this is dangerous).

The ones who are identified as easily compromised or willing to act in even minor, corrupt ways, are elevated to positions of power and authority.

The bad guys cannot afford to have good people wake up.

Too bad for them. It's happening.

bvd9701's avatar

The fact that you admit to socializing with such people reflects very poorly on YOU. Take some time to reflect...and I suggest you choose a better circle of friends. You live in an amoral, narcissistic bubble that’s inevitably going to BURST.

None if these allegedly superior attributes or credentials matter anymore. No one cares how “nice” your friends appear to you. I’m sure Hitler had plenty of acolytes who were adept at social chitchat, too.

Your NIH acquaintances are ALL complicit in a campaign of WORLDWIDE DEMOCIDE...and will be SEVERELY PUNISHED as collaborators in the execution of planet-wide Crimes Against Humanity.

Four years into this organized depopulation exercise, the current death count EXCEEDS that of the Nazis. You do realize that, right?

The final number of exterminated victims will not be known for years, but we know it will number in the BILLIONS OF MURDERED HUMAN BEINGS.

These demons from hell will face consequences commensurate with the gravity of their crimes against the human race.

No mercy.

No excuses.

No exceptions of any kind.

Dani Richards's avatar

Interesting thought. I grew up in this environment and these are my family members and many are lifelong friends. They don't just "appear" nice -- they ARE nice. They are, however, brainwashed and deluded, AS I WAS.

I suppose you could say my date of awakening was about 12 years ago. (I never worked in the government.) My first impulse and instinct was to try to help my loved ones wake up, too, so that's what I've been working on. It started with sharing information. Some are open to it, and most are not (yet). It's not over til it's over, but they ARE dear to me.

I do not see any reason to divide myself from these people. I think "divide and conquer" is what the bad guys want us to do.

I will always hold out hope, no matter how faint that hope is, that my friends and family will awaken. If it could happen to me, perhaps it could happen to them. If there's anything I can do to help, I will do it.

I love them.

bvd9701's avatar

With 7 million plus corpses... and counting and counting and counting and counting - these lame excuses HAVE ZERO CREDIBILITY.

At this point, literally there is NO EXCUSE.

I question the degree to which you are actually “awake”. You seem to believe your circle of acquaintances are immune to facing the consequences of complicity in DEMOCIDE. You can’t have it both ways. It’s not possible.

You are deluded if you think there will be some tidy, respectful, middle ground where those highly-credentialed apparatchiks who tacitly collaborated in CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY can just shrug their shoulders and claim to have no knowledge of the decades-long planning for atrocities against all human kind.

I assure you that these excuses are NOT going to judged as acceptable by the surviving members of the human race. The retribution will be more harsh and long-lasting than you can possibly imagine.

Dani Richards's avatar

I've thought about what you said. A question:

what terrible thing will happen if I keep the door open to maintaining loving relationships with my loved ones (especially family; parents, siblings and adult children)? I speak truth to them about the evil I see in the world, even though they see things differently (as someone else wrote, "the good Germans.") What's the harm?

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023
Comment removed
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023
Comment removed
Dani Richards's avatar

I hope they choose well, too, Cindy. The choice IS theirs. It's the deeply asleep ones I feel most sad about. The conflicted ones are already wrestling with their own demons.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023
Comment removed
Bandit's avatar

Just how he saw it.

Peter 🔒's avatar

Dani is good peeps; but you have a VERY Strong Argument. Collaborators need to see the light/truth or ..... ?

John H.'s avatar

It's a huge problem, especially since lies are now the common currency and truth has been placed in the position that lies once were (complete Satanic moral inversion) Some of the people she describes may truly be invincibly ignorant and thus morally not culpable. Unfortunately, no one person can ever be certain if they are truly invincibly ignorant (in God's eyes) or simply posing as such for the sake of convenience/expedience. My rule of thumb is; if you find yourself trying to justify your moral stance on an issue by resorting to invincible ignorance, you are culpable. Many people will no doubt be shocked by what is held against them at the time of their individual judgement upon death. It is best to keep that constantly in mind.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023
Comment removed
bvd9701's avatar

Seven plus million human beings on this planet were not murdered by an IDEA.

They were murdered in a pre-meditated campaign of DEMOCIDE by PEOPLE...traitorous, duplicitous fellow human beings.

These collaborators deserve to be ferociously, vociferously attacked until they take their very last breath.

They are guilty of Crimes Against Humanity, the scale of which this planet has never seen before.

There’s no Marquess of Queensberry Rules for this kind of unprecedented global crime. You need a hefty dose of realism...fast.

Dani Richards's avatar

turn it up to eleven. That might bring results. Especially with talk of reinstating mask and vaccine mandates this fall.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023
Comment removed
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

They perform covert and overt cognitive tests to select early and hard for compliance on employees particularly in medical research - NIH, DARPA. That is why there are never/rarely any whistleblowers in government agencies. Industry/contract is more likely to see whistleblowers.

Duchess's avatar

Yesterday, I looked up on google and found out that the average IQ of my fellow countrymen was around 98. Now, I know that is not the mean, but I am seriously afraid now to go to the grocery store.

These people are driving cars, going here and there...and somehow, I have been blissfully ignorant of how many stupid people there are in the world......

And now they are bringing back the pandemic restrictions...masks, distancing, testing...OMG , at least 50 percent of the population ((and probably more) are going be falling into lockstep AGAIN.

Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Your last sentence was the most important one.

ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Although, I should think that whistle blowers would be extremely careful to keep their heads down 'among friends'

nymusicdaily's avatar

truth from a real whistleblower KJ!

Flyway's avatar

Whenever l have a feeling that there is finally HOPE, after reading your post, l am in despair. To realize that even the brightest people among us can be led like sheep. They have absolutely no curiosity. It makes me so scared to imagine what is yet to come.

Brewer55's avatar

I have an attorney brother that by all accounts is a smart, well-educated individual. However, we stopped talking about politics and our worldviews shortly after Oblahblah took office. To this day, he still buys into just about everything he gets from his MSM sources. He is proud to say he was 'double-jabbed and triple boosted'. His exact words not too long ago.

2 weeks ago he had a minor heart attack. In the last 2 years he has been diagnosed with diabetes and is now on medication.

GK's avatar

Let me guess. "Without the shots, it would have been worse."

Duchess's avatar

Oblahblah...can I use that? Its perfect!

Dani Richards's avatar

I am sorry to hear that.

Duchess's avatar

Right there beside you Barbara. I am terrified.

Socal201's avatar

The majority of them are arrogant with no common sense.

JLo2112's avatar

Ask your NIH associates to explain the risk-benefit calculus for injecting anyone under the age of 18 with a COVID vax?

BENEFIT: Cite the IFR for that age group, either the CDC's (planning scenario 5: 0-17yrs = 0.002%; 18-49yrs=0.05%) or Dr. Ioannidis' study( 0-19yrs=0.0003%) - this would be the benefit portion of the discussion with the max benefit being a reduction in IFR probability. Of course they may want to cite lower hospitalization or illness severity, but those endpoints were never tested or determined. In fact there evidence to contrary with regard both - this is a misdirection. Also, the shot doesn't prevent infection nor transmission, so benefit is simply the avoidance of death.

RISK: Then cite the known Cardiac risks both documented at the beginning and now with even higher numbers. Don't forget the unknown risks that are blatantly being ignored (no investigations) and those that have yet to be determined - think 5, 10 or 15yrs down the line.

COVID Shot calculus: Extremely low benefit with both high and unknown risk. Conclusion - no way.

For context, you can also state the season flu IFR of about 0.02% (more than 10x worse than the most generous COVID IFR in the 0-18yr range). The safety profile of the annual flu shot is extremely safe.

Seasonal flu shot calculus: low benefit and low risk. Conclusion, take it or leave it.

Any one of them that says the COVID shot should be taken by any child under the age of 18 is severely limited in their thinking irrespective of their education and pedigree. Anything else that comes from their mind is suspect and questionable at best and probably morally corrupt lies and misdirection at worst. Those shots should have never been approved for anyone let alone children.

JLo2112's avatar

Also note that the math works in support of rejecting the shot across all age groups. The child age group is the most egregious travesty of science, common sense, innocence, and justice. There is no punishment harsh enough for those that willingly hurt or endanger children.

Lysander Spoonbread's avatar

ACtually, this b the mic drop...

Boom!

Peter 🔒's avatar

Excellent points. Cog Dis is a BITCH

Peter 🔒's avatar

Just a note. Flu shots Not Safe anymore. Flu + mrna (or nano-tech) likely in them.

Karen E. Hetherington's avatar

Those government employees are not aware of their role in crushing the breath of life out of each one of us by continuing this charade? The term for people who indirectly harm and kill others for a paycheck is some one being used to follow through on other's objectives. They need to get out from being an occupational and money slave.

Steve C's avatar

They sound like perfect living, breathing examples of the term "Government Worker."

Dani Richards's avatar

yes, and it sounds crazy but they are among my best friends, and I grew up with a parent with a full federal government career.

A lot of very, very nice, likeable, smart, highly-credentialed, good, kind, well-meaning, well-paid people in positions of power who truly believe that they are doing good for the people of this planet. They believe that their colleagues are all just as good people as they are (and our government is not trying to kill us!).

And that makes them very dangerous.

I am really the odd man out. They see me as stubborn and easily misled by propaganda. Plus, I don't have an advanced degree......

Brewer55's avatar

No one said Satan was an idiot. He is nefarious and has planned this out well by indoctrinating everyone in higher learning (also in the K-12 government school system) to believe that what they are doing is for the good of all.

I'm willing to bet most, if not all of your friends an NIH, are non-Christians. If that is the case, then the government has become their god. This was really an 'AHA!' moment for me not too many years ago trying to understand how so many could be compliant with an out of control state or federal government.

Dani Richards's avatar

^^THIS^^

When I was younger, "church" seemed to be more of a part of people's lives -- normal, even. Everyone I knew had a place they went to worship (or gather). But these days it seems more normal for people to randomly declare (in almost any context): "I'm not religious." or "Christians don't believe in Science (said with a derisive sneer)" or even "I'm an atheist."

Never would anyone have ever admitted to that scandalous non-belief, back in the day.

I've concluded that these non-Christians (who could be atheists or worship something else, probably without realizing) have decided that if you are a scientist, you cannot believe in God. And vice versa.

Duchess's avatar

And thank God you do not.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Aug 23, 2023
Comment deleted
NB Tween's avatar

Thanks for sharing. Having all the puzzle pieces separated, indeed keeps many from seeing the big picture. Add in that most ppl are good and kind and don’t even consider those at the helm may not be.

I wrote a piece that I think speaks to the limenal space we find ourselves in on either side of the great divide.

This seems a good place to share it.

“A Word”

Oh I miss the days of ‘yore

When we took it all in stride

Like gentle waves lapping the shore

The simple changing of the tides

There is a different change in the seasons

Not the four, but in man’s reason

Like a nightmare to which we awake

As everything civil starts to break

What’s this leaving of the senses?

Or blaming another’s lament?

Rather than those in towers of power

Reigning o’er all with contempt

Their pyramid schemes are built on our backs

As our health, wealth, and freedoms are under attack

Through endless debt-slavery of taxation

They fund war, corruption, death and destruction

What is the goal but subjugation

For it’s not just a war on God and Creation

But on the sovereignty of every man and nation

Put on the armor of salvation

Do not fall into the great divide

Where souls are lost before pride

And when it seems there’s no place to run or hide

Be still and listen deep inside

Bow not, nor bend to fear’s machinations

But trust in the author of our salvation

By this world be not conformed

But by the renewing of your mind be transformed

drhome's avatar

They had a good paycheck when they were working. And now a great Fed pension, from our tax $$. Don't expect them to say anything that's possibly outside the brainwashing. If they took away the $$, they would change their tunes very fast!!

CaliforniaLost's avatar

"they are all highly intelligent"

Anyone who thinks a paper mask works for anything beyong stopping drool is not smart. (Sorry mom)

SuszaQ's avatar

Probably afraid to lose the good job and excellent bennies. I told my husband today I should have, a: gotten into insurance brokerage,

b: banking, or c: a government job.

Silly me.

Dani Richards's avatar

but you have saved your soul instead

Doug Thorburn's avatar

Great conversation. I couldn't agree more: they are often lovely people and we must do our best to instill common sense. Which you have because you are the one without the PhD.

John H.'s avatar

I don't doubt what you say as that has been my experience with so-called health professionals of the multiple advanced degree types who inhabit academic medicine. See my comment below.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023
Comment removed
Dani Richards's avatar

not an excuse at all, but I will point out that you are older (as am I) and we received better educations (even though we were indoctrinated). Younger people, including people at the prime of their dangerous public health careers, really got a very strong dose of brainwashing. The younger ones (20s and 30s) even more so. It's frightening. Not an excuse.

Maybe instead of "well-educated" we should say "well-indoctrinated" with advanced degrees of indoctrination.

Also.... the internet has really clamped down and what used to be fairly accessible and easy to research even 8 years ago is much, much harder. To be able to just "stumble upon" truthful information -- not so very likely anymore. You have to know it's there, and you have to be a relentless digger for truth.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 24, 2023
Comment removed
Dani Richards's avatar

After so many years of trying in various ways to improve things by the usual means of activism or advocacy or leadership roles without seeing it bear fruit, we could give up or we can find another way. If that is "kill or be killed," then so be it. I really do sense that we are at that inflection point, Tony. Things are not the same as they were, and we are on the edge. It feels a bit tricky to navigate (especially in a compassionate, humane way), but the only path is forward. It's not what I expected. But it's where we are. I hope to make it through, make a few decisive moves of my own and see a better future. No way I'm giving up.

Kimpossible Truths's avatar

Way to be direct and to the point! Epic. I hope you get a response.

Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I'm betting on brave whistleblower :-) Here's a video of my poem to spur his or her courage:

• “Ode to a Whistleblower” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/ode-to-a-whistleblower-video-tribute)

Kathleen Janoski's avatar

No, a brave whistleblower would use a "burner" email address or proton mail.

I suspect this is an intimidation tactic.

Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

It's never too late to discover one's conscience. Daniel Ellsberg learned that and nearly singlehandedly ended the Vietnam War:

• “Ode to a Whistleblower” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/ode-to-a-whistleblower)

Kathleen Janoski's avatar

After the last 3.5 years, I am pretty cynical.

Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Understandably so. I dare this person to prove you wrong :-)

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 23, 2023
Comment removed
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I would graciously accept the honor 🏆

• “Letter to a Mainstream Straddler: Live Not by Half-Lies” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-mainstream-straddler)

Dissentious Skwrl's avatar

Your optimism is inspiring madam, though hard to feel personally during such turbulent times. This is a beautiful tribute indeed!

Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Thank you, Dissentious Skwrl! Aside from psycho/sociopaths and other Cluster B personality types, every human being has an inner kernel of courage that can be kindled under the right circumstances.

Dissentious Skwrl's avatar

The white-pilled side of my peanut brain could not agree more! Without the light of hope we have nothing but the darkness of gloom and despair. Thanks for keeping that little lantern fueled!

CH's avatar

I really would not be surprised this person subscribed in their official capacity as an employee of the NIH to monitor our comments. It is the Commie/Fascist way afterall.

Edwin's avatar

They have been "monitoring" our comments for a long time.

I imagine they have quite a dossier on 2SG as well as myself.

Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Pennsylvania cheated 2020.

(Waiting for FBI jack-booted thugs showing up at 6:00 am.)

ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

I saw that F-graph in Australia in real time. It wasn't 3am where I live when the counting stopped. They never account for time zones.

none none's avatar

Well let's get that person's email address, and we can all send them an email with our opinions. Since they're brave enough to use their work email,, we can 'officially' let them know what we think...

Unapologetically Me's avatar

Regarding subscribing in order to "monitor our comments": One can do that, without becoming a subscriber...

Just saying.

CH's avatar

So maybe it was done to intimidate, like 2SG says in the article.

Etienne de la Boetie2's avatar

The NIH has 666 hidden in their logo

2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Hence my TRIPLE inversion of article image.

AnnR's avatar

Anyone using their .gov email is NOT your friend. Federal employees are prohibited from using their work emails for personal reasons. I'd be tempted to cut him/her off. Force the feds to work a little bit harder for their pound of flesh!!!!

Kristy G.'s avatar

Thank you, this is the key point: prohibition on using work email for personal reasons. So somehow it's within the scope of this person's work duties to monitor substacks.

Dissentious Skwrl's avatar

Oooh buddy, let's get the popcorn! Here's hoping this is a person of conscious and not a scumbag with intimidation on their mind 🤔

Peter 🔒's avatar

I wanna see what the lil gov bitch has to say. 😁😁😋🤣

ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

I'm followed by heaps of Australian law enforcement so I wrote an article about them, and dedicated my article about cognitive warfare to ASIO.

I SEE YOU SCUMBAGS: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/micro-donations-to-excessdeathsau

Kathleen Janoski's avatar

I'm voting for it is a scumbag.

Dissentious Skwrl's avatar

The black-pilled side of my peanut brain finds it difficult to disagree with you.

John's avatar

I must admit I can't see a good honest reason why any government agency that routinely pushes a pack of made-up lies should want to subscribe to anyone that exposes their lies. Looks like you are on Ze list. ......... https://youtu.be/kYz2nPE0BCk

Rebel2Tyrants's avatar

I would also like to know. I would like to know how ANYONE can continue to work for NIH without being evil to the core besides intending to blow the proverbial whistle.

Rosalind McGill's avatar

I hope your stack breaks their programming!

Nefahotep's avatar

I just received a free sub from the individual that you mentioned. I guess we must be over the target. The Illegal Three Letter agencies seem to think that they may intimidate us. All I'm doing is banning him. Removing him from the list.

ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

To say I'm jealous is an understatement.

All NIH.gov emails invited to my Substack. Thank you.

Gimpy's avatar

Hopefully more and more fed.gov employees are realizing that the long-term consequences of their continued compliance are much more detrimental to themselves and their families than the short-term pain of reprisals, unemployment, and dislocation that come from whistleblowing.

Though I do support any monkey-wrenching that are able to do while in their jobs.

TheEntsLiveHere's avatar

Hmmm. Do you know what has happened to Christie Laura Grace? She seems to have disappeared of the internet/Substack

Edwin's avatar

Eventually, we all will.