Back in 1975 we were taught in 5th grade that the U.S. could become like the arctic. Warmer southern states would become more like northern states much as far as weather I recall. Climate expert "Bill Hates" discussed idea of deforestation and burying the timbers in the ground when trees are supposed to eat carbon. It's the last big money, power, and control grab.
I remember sitting in the school library as a child in the 1960s, looking at illustrated books describing how plants breathe in carbon dioxide and breathe out oxygen, and that people do the opposite. How we are interdependent and beautifully help each other. How this is miraculously the way things were designed. It never made sense to me when, as an adult, all of a sudden carbon dioxide became the enemy. Because if you logically extend that, it means that living creatures, including us, are the enemy. That's an obvious lie.
My husband is a chemist. You'd be surprised how many of his co-workers-- some of which have advanced degrees-- actually believe the climate change cr@p.
When explaining climate change, Rush Limbaugh said... "if you don't believe in God, you'll believe in anything."
That is so scary. I figure that the government officials and media putting forth the lies and the horrible policies fall into one of two camps: either they are knowingly lying, or they are ignorantly brainwashed. Either one is horrible. I guess there might be a third possibility: they have really low IQs (I'm talking public officials/media talking heads, here) and simply do not understand the data, find data boring, don't feel that they need to know anything, and can just listen to "experts" and read the teleprompters. It's a circular trap of midwittery, and I'm so sick of it. The only thing I don't know is the percentage of everyday people (not climate scientists) who are still under the climate change/carbon credit/green energy spell. The true believers (brainwashed) and the low IQ uneducated who outsource all knowledge to others because they feel it is too far above them -- how many of us are onto it, and many of us are cheering on the wrong team?
I asked Bing Chat about Bill Gates idea of burying trees. It claimed that his idea was backed by science and that thinning forests of dead trees and burying them would keep the trees from releasing carbon during the decomposition process. It would reduce wildfires. There are creeps at the WEF that all they talk about is population and one said it was selfish to want to live beyond the age 75. It's easy to see how Convid is part of the Climate hoax puzzle. Years back Bill Gates said with better reproductive health care and vaccines the worlds population could be reduced by 15% in 10 years. These have all been scrubbed from the internet and AI says the interview was taken out of context. Seeing the video clips every country is on board with this nonsense. Agenda 2030.
Meanwhile in Canada- half of our forests are burning again this year due to a——n, errr climate change, provincial governments are banning hikers from the woods on fire or not, and this after we selected errrr I mean elected the former UN Climate Change head envoy, and WEF Board of trustees as prime minister. Please pay close attention to what is going on in Canada. 🇨🇦 🔥
I know a lot of supposedly intelligent people who are a total waste of time to argue with on the subject of climate change as their indoctrinated minds are made up. Only some of us can see the forest through the trees.
“We are currently at critically low CO2 levels, all while the NWO globopedo cabal is hellbent on reducing CO2 as if they are terraforming the planet for some nefarious agenda on behalf of another species that is driving their deranged anti-human agenda.”
The saddest and weirdest thing is that people dare to believe the lies which are easily debunked by true science facts....like CO2 is necessary for life! I learned that in elementary school and most people know this, so why the freaking out by people who should realize this. They are under strong delusion because they do not love the truth. 2Thessalonians 2 People not knowing God are those who believe the lies of these devil's , it is that serious!
If you really want to see how far the cult of "we are destroying the earth" has gone, speak to a young people, especially a younger college student/ graduate. They honestly believe that the earth is in much, much worse shape now than it was 50 years ago.
In the meantime, people of a certain age are seeing eagles in places they never saw 40+ years ago.
This is how the devil's ruled over the Dark Ages, with fear and superstitions. They are taking us back there right now in a sense. Then they can rule again with little to no opposition. This is history and it has been going on for centuries by the same evil seats of power. This is all written in the bible. 500 years ago the Counter Reformation began so Rome could regain the power she lost. This is suppressed history, revised, buried and never taught. Hard to find thee history books unless you know the authors. Identify the devils and you can avoid the fear of their evil.
1970… in seventh grade I would give short synopsis’s in class of the coming ice age or that man would be extinct in 50 years I gathered from the newspaper…
Yes, who still remembers the Maldives scam from the 90's , they claimed that the island group will 'very soon' as in couple years be taken over by the rising sea because of the global warming and melting polar caps.
Money was collected to transport huge amounts of sand and rocks there to build flood berms etc ( i may be wrong but i very much doubt anything was built or transported, someone pocketed the cash )
Another money collection scam was for relocating the poor people of Maldives so they would not drown when the sea took the islands.
Well, the Maldives island group is still there, 30+ years later, tourism there is better than ever, nothing has sunken to the sea and nobody has been forced to relocate ( only thing relocated was the money that was collected -> in to the climate grifters bank accounts )
Whole thing was buried in the memory hole. Mention it to the climate grifters of today and you will be called conspiracy theorist or anti-science loon etc.
"The Earth warms and the Earth cools. It always has and always will. The only thing that's man-made here is the profit margin." <--- awesome statement, i'll steal that one :D
You may be right in the essence of what you say, but you lead with a very bad source. Here is Patrick Moore on Roundup(TM) / glyphosate, where he is exposed as a liar and a fraud:
In the interview you cited he is completely wrong and comes off deranged, but every single thing he expressed in my article is 100% correct.
I am right in what I have written.
PS don't forget this is the guy that founded GreenPeace, only to later realize he was dead wrong. I believe his stance on glyphosate has also been completely reversed.
He has proven that he is willing to change his position and views, which puts him ahead of 99% of the so-called “experts” on pretty well everything that cling stubbornly to their fixed positions despite any new facts or evidence that may prove otherwise.
He said, quite confidently, "You can drink a whole quart of it, and it won't hurt you," and when asked if he'd like a drink, said, "I'd be happy to," then, "Not really, but I know it wouldn't hurt me," then when offered a drink again comes back with "I'm not stupid," then back to "It's not dangerous to humans," then he refuses it again, tries to change the subject, then walks out, with an abusive remark to the interviewer.
So whatever he might have said later, I don't believe he changed his mind in light of new evidence. He knew all along that it was dangerous. If he gave up on that lie, it's because he could never sustain it again after that interview.
Best interview I've ever seen.
As I said twice now, the essence of the article may be true - but Patrick Moore is the wrong witness to call on.
I'm curious that he's changed his declared position on glyphosate. If there are any citations of this I'd be interested - though it's clear in the interview that he knew glyphosate was dangerous even when he was defending it.
Re: the rest of your article, as I said, "You may be right in the essence of what you say."
to be fair the interview I cited is 10 years old. I don't know when different countries banned it, but again, it's obvious he knew it was dangerous when he said you could drink it, and then refused to drink it.
Back in 1975 we were taught in 5th grade that the U.S. could become like the arctic. Warmer southern states would become more like northern states much as far as weather I recall. Climate expert "Bill Hates" discussed idea of deforestation and burying the timbers in the ground when trees are supposed to eat carbon. It's the last big money, power, and control grab.
I remember sitting in the school library as a child in the 1960s, looking at illustrated books describing how plants breathe in carbon dioxide and breathe out oxygen, and that people do the opposite. How we are interdependent and beautifully help each other. How this is miraculously the way things were designed. It never made sense to me when, as an adult, all of a sudden carbon dioxide became the enemy. Because if you logically extend that, it means that living creatures, including us, are the enemy. That's an obvious lie.
My husband is a chemist. You'd be surprised how many of his co-workers-- some of which have advanced degrees-- actually believe the climate change cr@p.
When explaining climate change, Rush Limbaugh said... "if you don't believe in God, you'll believe in anything."
Fire them all.
That is so scary. I figure that the government officials and media putting forth the lies and the horrible policies fall into one of two camps: either they are knowingly lying, or they are ignorantly brainwashed. Either one is horrible. I guess there might be a third possibility: they have really low IQs (I'm talking public officials/media talking heads, here) and simply do not understand the data, find data boring, don't feel that they need to know anything, and can just listen to "experts" and read the teleprompters. It's a circular trap of midwittery, and I'm so sick of it. The only thing I don't know is the percentage of everyday people (not climate scientists) who are still under the climate change/carbon credit/green energy spell. The true believers (brainwashed) and the low IQ uneducated who outsource all knowledge to others because they feel it is too far above them -- how many of us are onto it, and many of us are cheering on the wrong team?
Maddening.
They are already cutting and buying trees in CA. How is it that ghoul gates is still breathing? Meanwhile: https://burnedthemovie.com/
I asked Bing Chat about Bill Gates idea of burying trees. It claimed that his idea was backed by science and that thinning forests of dead trees and burying them would keep the trees from releasing carbon during the decomposition process. It would reduce wildfires. There are creeps at the WEF that all they talk about is population and one said it was selfish to want to live beyond the age 75. It's easy to see how Convid is part of the Climate hoax puzzle. Years back Bill Gates said with better reproductive health care and vaccines the worlds population could be reduced by 15% in 10 years. These have all been scrubbed from the internet and AI says the interview was taken out of context. Seeing the video clips every country is on board with this nonsense. Agenda 2030.
Meanwhile in Canada- half of our forests are burning again this year due to a——n, errr climate change, provincial governments are banning hikers from the woods on fire or not, and this after we selected errrr I mean elected the former UN Climate Change head envoy, and WEF Board of trustees as prime minister. Please pay close attention to what is going on in Canada. 🇨🇦 🔥
And now the crazies in charge want to spray Ontario(?) with glyphosate to kill the birch trees!! Insane!
I know a lot of supposedly intelligent people who are a total waste of time to argue with on the subject of climate change as their indoctrinated minds are made up. Only some of us can see the forest through the trees.
“We are currently at critically low CO2 levels, all while the NWO globopedo cabal is hellbent on reducing CO2 as if they are terraforming the planet for some nefarious agenda on behalf of another species that is driving their deranged anti-human agenda.”
“They Live” ???
Not globopedo.
The correct term is "globohomopsychopedo."
Thank You for Clearing that one up...
U couldn’t say it any better.!!👌
The saddest and weirdest thing is that people dare to believe the lies which are easily debunked by true science facts....like CO2 is necessary for life! I learned that in elementary school and most people know this, so why the freaking out by people who should realize this. They are under strong delusion because they do not love the truth. 2Thessalonians 2 People not knowing God are those who believe the lies of these devil's , it is that serious!
If you really want to see how far the cult of "we are destroying the earth" has gone, speak to a young people, especially a younger college student/ graduate. They honestly believe that the earth is in much, much worse shape now than it was 50 years ago.
In the meantime, people of a certain age are seeing eagles in places they never saw 40+ years ago.
This is how the devil's ruled over the Dark Ages, with fear and superstitions. They are taking us back there right now in a sense. Then they can rule again with little to no opposition. This is history and it has been going on for centuries by the same evil seats of power. This is all written in the bible. 500 years ago the Counter Reformation began so Rome could regain the power she lost. This is suppressed history, revised, buried and never taught. Hard to find thee history books unless you know the authors. Identify the devils and you can avoid the fear of their evil.
1970… in seventh grade I would give short synopsis’s in class of the coming ice age or that man would be extinct in 50 years I gathered from the newspaper…
Yes, who still remembers the Maldives scam from the 90's , they claimed that the island group will 'very soon' as in couple years be taken over by the rising sea because of the global warming and melting polar caps.
Money was collected to transport huge amounts of sand and rocks there to build flood berms etc ( i may be wrong but i very much doubt anything was built or transported, someone pocketed the cash )
Another money collection scam was for relocating the poor people of Maldives so they would not drown when the sea took the islands.
Well, the Maldives island group is still there, 30+ years later, tourism there is better than ever, nothing has sunken to the sea and nobody has been forced to relocate ( only thing relocated was the money that was collected -> in to the climate grifters bank accounts )
Whole thing was buried in the memory hole. Mention it to the climate grifters of today and you will be called conspiracy theorist or anti-science loon etc.
"The Earth warms and the Earth cools. It always has and always will. The only thing that's man-made here is the profit margin." <--- awesome statement, i'll steal that one :D
Strange... my comment got deleted. Here it is again.
More data for your review on this issue.
NOAA graph on Mauna Loa carbon readings to 2025 - continuing the graph in the article.
gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/mlo.html
NOAA video of CO2 in the atmosphere to 2025 and back to the ice age based on ice core samples.
youtube.com/watch?v=8KrgPPO1h0A
https://exploringhumans.substack.com/p/unleash-your-inner-female-bonobo
You may be right in the essence of what you say, but you lead with a very bad source. Here is Patrick Moore on Roundup(TM) / glyphosate, where he is exposed as a liar and a fraud:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovKw6YjqSfM
In the interview you cited he is completely wrong and comes off deranged, but every single thing he expressed in my article is 100% correct.
I am right in what I have written.
PS don't forget this is the guy that founded GreenPeace, only to later realize he was dead wrong. I believe his stance on glyphosate has also been completely reversed.
He has proven that he is willing to change his position and views, which puts him ahead of 99% of the so-called “experts” on pretty well everything that cling stubbornly to their fixed positions despite any new facts or evidence that may prove otherwise.
Did you see the video?
He said, quite confidently, "You can drink a whole quart of it, and it won't hurt you," and when asked if he'd like a drink, said, "I'd be happy to," then, "Not really, but I know it wouldn't hurt me," then when offered a drink again comes back with "I'm not stupid," then back to "It's not dangerous to humans," then he refuses it again, tries to change the subject, then walks out, with an abusive remark to the interviewer.
So whatever he might have said later, I don't believe he changed his mind in light of new evidence. He knew all along that it was dangerous. If he gave up on that lie, it's because he could never sustain it again after that interview.
Best interview I've ever seen.
As I said twice now, the essence of the article may be true - but Patrick Moore is the wrong witness to call on.
I'm curious that he's changed his declared position on glyphosate. If there are any citations of this I'd be interested - though it's clear in the interview that he knew glyphosate was dangerous even when he was defending it.
Re: the rest of your article, as I said, "You may be right in the essence of what you say."
to be fair the interview I cited is 10 years old. I don't know when different countries banned it, but again, it's obvious he knew it was dangerous when he said you could drink it, and then refused to drink it.
This great man should be more in light this days!
Friedrich August von Hayek.
"Emergencies" have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.
"climate change" vs. "climate modification."
Geoengineering is "climate modification."