PSYOP-CLIMATE-CHANGE Debunked: New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model
Since the Cult created Club of Rome was founded in 1968, the usual criminal suspects in the UN, WEF, WHO, IMF, et al. have all been banking on PSYOP-CLIMATE-CHANGE to ultimately usher in their Great Reset dystopia.
These Cult nodes have patiently bided their time, seeding and normalizing the masses for decades now to believe that they are the “scourge” that is destroying the planet in inducing anthropogenic “climate change”. This has to date been a most effective slow suicide program that is even of late conditioning cannibalism as a valid option in combating said “climate change.”
Become a paid subscriber: support the “Do NOT comply.” It’s 8 cents a day.
Of course, PSYOP-19 and the various other schemes are serving to effectively soften up the masses with mass formation psychosis such that PSYOP-CLIMATE-CHANGE can be ramped up that much more readily into total planetary lockdowns. In this 4th Industrial scenario “climate change” will be used as the perma-excuse to justify quite literally any and all technocommunist “mandates.”
This substack has previously exposed some of the egregious frauds of the ESG green movement; to wit:
Which brings us an important paradigm shifting research study from 2017 that has been avoided by MSM and climate “experts” as if it were the plague (pun intended) entitled, New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model.
A recent study has revealed that the Earth’s natural atmospheric greenhouse effect is around 90 K or about 2.7 times stronger than assumed for the past 40 years. A thermal enhancement of such a magnitude cannot be explained with the observed amount of outgoing infrared long-wave radiation absorbed by the atmosphere (i.e. ≈ 158 W m-2), thus requiring a re-examination of the underlying Greenhouse theory. We present here a new investigation into the physical nature of the atmospheric thermal effect using a novel empirical approach toward predicting the Global Mean Annual near-surface equilibrium Temperature (GMAT) of rocky planets with diverse atmospheres. Our method utilizes Dimensional Analysis (DA) applied to a vetted set of observed data from six celestial bodies representing a broad range of physical environments in our Solar System, i.e. Venus, Earth, the Moon, Mars, Titan (a moon of Saturn), and Triton (a moon of Neptune). Twelve relationships (models) suggested by DA are explored via non-linear regression analyses that involve dimensionless products comprised of solar irradiance, greenhouse-gas partial pressure/density and total atmospheric pressure/density as forcing variables, and two temperature ratios as dependent variables. One non-linear regression model is found to statistically outperform the rest by a wide margin. Our analysis revealed that GMATs of rocky planets with tangible atmospheres and a negligible geothermal surface heating can accurately be predicted over a broad range of conditions using only two forcing variables: top-of-the-atmosphere solar irradiance and total surface atmospheric pressure. The hereto discovered interplanetary pressure-temperature relationship is shown to be statistically robust while describing a smooth physical continuum without climatic tipping points. This continuum fully explains the recently discovered 90 K thermal effect of Earth’s atmosphere. The new model displays characteristics of an emergent macro-level thermodynamic relationship heretofore unbeknown to science that has important theoretical implications. A key entailment from the model is that the atmospheric ‘greenhouse effect’ currently viewed as a radiative phenomenon is in fact an adiabatic (pressure-induced) thermal enhancement analogous to compression heating and independent of atmospheric composition. Consequently, the global down-welling long-wave flux presently assumed to drive Earth’s surface warming appears to be a product of the air temperature set by solar heating and atmospheric pressure. In other words, the so-called ‘greenhouse back radiation’ is globally a result of the atmospheric thermal effect rather than a cause for it. Our empirical model has also fundamental implications for the role of oceans, water vapour, and planetary albedo in global climate. Since produced by a rigorous attempt to describe planetary temperatures in the context of a cosmic continuum using an objective analysis of vetted observations from across the Solar System, these findings call for a paradigm shift in our understanding of the atmospheric ‘greenhouse effect’ as a fundamental property of climate.
This study uses actual science to incontrovertibly establish that, “so-called ‘greenhouse back radiation’ is globally a result of the atmospheric thermal effect rather than a cause for it.”
The authors use Dimensional Analysis (DA) to map out atmospheric thermal effects, and supply actual verifiable and repeatable data. This kind of science is the antithesis of the green cult which only ever invokes scientism by blaming a vital gas of life in CO2 as their excuse for weather.
And yet there is not a single research study that has ever been presented that proves that CO2 is a knob for temperatures.
Ask the most “expert” climatologist to establish reference temperatures (Tr) in relation to Relative Atmospheric Thermal Enhancement (RATE) to describe the observed variation(s) of said GMAT. They will mumble conspiracy this or that and revert back to the absurd CO2 claim.
The research, because it accounts for science-based temperature changes, is universally applicable to any planet in the solar system. Trying applying the laughable CO2 “argument” universally — not only is this CO2 scam inapplicable in any consistent way to earth, but it would also fail miserably on a universal level.
The study aggregates all “green house gases”, and compares this to three other possibilities, yet it is important to note that current CO2 levels at 421ppm is an infinitesimally tiny percentage of the atmosphere (i.e. all “green house gases”), more at rounding error small, that there is no possible way to ascribe to it a meaningful role in temperature; to wit:
There are four plausible explanations for the apparent lack of a close relationship between GMAT and atmospheric greenhouse gasses in our results: 1) The amounts of greenhouse gases considered in our analysis only refer to near-surface atmospheric compositions and do not describe the infrared optical depth of the entire atmospheric column; 2) The analysis lumped all greenhouse gases together and did not take into account differences in the infrared spectral absorptivity of individual gasses; 3) The effect of atmospheric pressure on broadening the infrared gas absorption lines might be stronger in reality than simulated by current radiative-transfer models, so that total pressure overrides the effect of a varying atmospheric composition across a wide range of planetary environments; and 4) Pressure as a force per unit area directly impacts the internal kinetic energy and temperature of a system in accordance with thermodynamic principles inferred from the Gas Law; hence, air pressure might be the actual physical causative factor controlling a planet’s surface temperature rather than the atmospheric infrared optical depth, which merely correlates with temperature due to its co-dependence on pressure.
Based on evidence discussed earlier, we argue that option #4 is the most likely reason for the poor predictive skill of greenhouse gases with respect to planetary GMATs revealed in our study.
When PSYOP-22 fails to stoke enough fear into total compliance, expect the reality inverting PSYOP-CLIMATE-CHANGE to be rolled out especially aggressively. Unless PSYOP-WW3 is truly in the cards now as a limited nuke strike option, which has been tabletopped and game planned as viable.
Enough people have been brainwashed into believing themselves to be the cause of all things bad in relation to the planet that they will go along with all imminent mass formation programs, from self-loathing into ever more idiotic useful idiocy to increased abortion, caloric restriction, gene therapeutics, cannibalism, and ultimately their ritualistic slow suicide premature denouements.
Do NOT comply.
Become a paid subscriber: support the “Do NOT comply.” It’s 8 cents a day.
When anyone says global climate warming
Or crisis I snap back Weather Wars.
Also their BS carbon scare oooh we are
Having a carbon foot print is soooo oh
No my carbon is taking up precious resources. Good Lord. There are article
Written in 1968 that continents would be
Underwater by 2000
Ask Obama why he bought his mansion
On the beach front?
These people are perverse they say do
Anything to seize power control
If they can take their own carbon
Concerns to another planet this would
Be a better place ….good riddance
I say enjoy your trip
The problem is convincing the people who are in the cult to look at the facts.