Could that minuscule 421ppm of atmospheric CO2 just be an ice sheet thickness knob too? If so, should this “climate change” cause higher temps, or does this alleged anthropogenic CO2 cause every planetary change and as such must be controlled by the One World Government central planners at the WEF and UN?
climate change, CO2, polar bear extinction, plastic island in the middle of the Pacific the size of Texas. All psy-op lies: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/107-dr-patrick-moore-founder-of-greenpeace#details
We are heading into a Grand Solar Minimum. Look it up. What it is and what will happen. CO2 is a trace gas that has almost no bearing on climate. Water Vapor is the most significant greenhouse gas, and the deep ocean current and the Sun have more bearing on climate. But CO2 and Nitrogen, the two main things plants need to grow, are outlawed. They want us DEAD
This is a thing that gets measured daily??? Someone tax dollars hard at work no doubt!!
Climatology is a Joke! - Kary Mullis, video posted 4 years ago.
Doesn't matter how much proof and evidence is shown at this point anymore. Too much money, energy and politics have been invested in this scam and people are gonna want a ROI.
Caribou peed on the sensor again.
1200 global scientists recently made a statement that global warming is coming from increased photon activity on the sun coming out of a little ice age, and this has zip to do with carbon dioxide.
In the 1960s, I took 20 university credits of weather forecasting. My texts written by academics described that the photons from the sun and ions accumulate in the ionosphere and have a significant impact on the weather, which determines long-time climate, along with the jet stream, which we never hear about any more. As these accumulate, energy imbalances occur including buildups of heat. This is released in the form of lightning that brings these imbalances into the Schumann Resonance. Lightning is a form of EMF or electricity. If we have any true global warming, it is from man-made EMFs, wifi, bluetooth, cell phones, satellites, and HAARP's weather manipulations also from EMFs.
Certainly carbon is part of the life cycle. Animals exhale carbon dioxide that feeds the vegetative/tree world that exhales oxygen for animals in an automatic feedback loop that is self-sustaining. It is ridiculous to blame the life cycle and accuse it of climate change that will harm human sustainability.
In the 1980s, Rockefeller presented global warming concept from carbon dioxide at the Rockerfeller-sponsored Rio de Janerio conference without any peer review. Later, this was used as a scientifically proven cause, but the scientific proof never occurred. About 1994 a group of global academics using the same flawed computer models program said ground center for maximum impacts of global warming would be at Thunder Bay, Canada, based upon assumptions not proven. Monsanto Corporation which was voted as the most hated and most destructive organization in the USA for several years in row within the last two decades just happens to be owned by Bill Gates and Rockefeller, who are partners in population control. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for Population Control was the original name of that institution.
"See? Chemtrail spray is WORKING!"
NOT TO WORRY. The climate-change folks apparently heard about this before we did, and they already have it under control.
According to a study published in Nature Climate Change on Aug. 29 (2 days ago), the conventional term "Greenland’s deglaciation", for which prediction models have suffered from multiple... er... "shortcomings", is to be replaced. It is now "Greenland ice imbalance".
Or to sound more scientific: "ice sheet disequilibrium".
Presumably for the same reasons "global warming" needed to morph to "climate change".
And behold -- these CC scientists have discovered that (a) it's "disequilibrium" and not "deglaciation" which is the real culprit for the global flooding that will surely happen this century; and (b) to avoid the disaster, we must control the "thickness perturbations" (the seasonal waxing and waning of ice) and "bring the current ice sheet into equilibrium with surface mass balance [later defined as snowfall accumulation minus runoff]."
That's right. We now need to keep Greenland's ice perfectly static, despite Winter's snowfall and Summer's runoff, in order to maintain a "committed sea level rise" (a mythical level not yet determined).
Short of controlling the behavior of all carbon-based species, plus controlling the weather both on earth and in the sun, I have no idea how such a goal could be achieved.
Neither do these researchers. All they are offering to do is set the future bar for Greenland ice sheet "equilibrium" and the ideal "sea-level rise" at some arbitrary level, with yet another computer model.
They will grade the success of this Quixotic effort not by tracking the Greenland ice, or by tracking sea levels, but by tracking how well humanity cooperates in taking the "necessary" measures.
When the whole thing fails, they can blame it on the polar bears and reindeer.
The only thing permanent is change, this includes the climate. Oh look, it’s raining today it was sunny yesterday, we’re all gonna die. Where’s my mask?
And if Ice sheets actually melting. The 99% would be told they are melting. I was told many years ago by a dear brother that the truth usually lies in the opposition direction than what you're told by by some folks.
I just tried to access http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/ and they are offline.
Could it be that interest in today's graph has resulted in the site being shut down?
But with 1.21 gigawatts of electrical power you can travel back in time...