PSYOP-CLIMATE-CHANGE Debunked: Greenland Ice Sheet Gained 7 Gigatons Of Mass In Just One Day Yesterday — The Largest Daily Gain Ever Recorded During The Summer
PSYOP-CLIMATE-CHANGE Debunked: Greenland Ice Sheet Gained 7 Gigatons Of Mass In Just One Day Yesterday — The Largest Daily Gain Ever Recorded During The Summer
Moore is wrong re Roundup is not toxic. Look up the toxic testimony and proof of serious disease determined by facts and evidence in US Courts. He's also wrong that nobody died in the USA from nuclear power. A worker was impaled into the ceiling of a Michigan nuclear reactor. Books listing data compilations of tens of thousands of deaths and deformed babies born from Chernobyl need to be read by Moore. I agree with his general info about global warming, which is the point being made here.
Yes you are right about roundup. The idea of allowing crop genetics modification to accommodate a pesticide was a horrible regulatory mistake. Your point about a single fatality does not address the general issue, however. Nuclear is super safe and Chernobyl standards were third world idiocy not ours. If we allow the global jackals to decrease “carbon use” we are murdering half of Africa and some of Europe. Nuclear is cheap, can be safe, and should not be equated w bombs.
Then we have Fukushima built with US technology from which has its radioactivity reaching the US's Western coast and now inside of much of our ocean food.
The science shows there is NO THRESHOLD BELOW WHICH ionizing radiation does not cause damage to cell membranes of living animals and humans. Any dosage damages. The question is "Can the body repair it fast enough?" The answer is "no" in today's unhealthy world.
If a person is deficient in nutrition, (due hugely to Bill Gates' widespread toxic Roundup or widespread GMO food products in the USA, each of which lowers 25%-75% of nutrients in the food), the body's natural ability to heal itself can't go through its necessary cascades; and damage results starting with the cell membranes which are vital for nutrients to feed the cell and for waste products to be eliminated from the cell. With enough membrane damage, repairs cannot occur occur insufficiently or not quick enough. That's the start of cancer and many other potentially lethal processes.
If the damage isn't repaired, the ionizing radiation disease takes over, likely shortening the lifespan.
This is very established non-controversial science proven during the Manhattan Project during and shortly after World War II for ionizing radiation which can be alpha, beta, or gamma radiation from nuclear power plants, depending on the isotopes. If the radiation is lodged inside the body from eating radioactive food, the body has serious exposure as it is now impossible to distance one-self from the radiation. If it is background radiation, harm or safety depends on the distance of the exposure, but we do not want radioactive elements floating around the environment or in our water or food. From cradle to grave, nuclear power costs more than all other forms of energy, and that is not counting the expenses of the unsolvable problem of the highly radioactive nuclear waste that will last hundreds of thousands of years without a safe storage place for that time period.
We are heading into a Grand Solar Minimum. Look it up. What it is and what will happen. CO2 is a trace gas that has almost no bearing on climate. Water Vapor is the most significant greenhouse gas, and the deep ocean current and the Sun have more bearing on climate. But CO2 and Nitrogen, the two main things plants need to grow, are outlawed. They want us DEAD
Doesn't matter how much proof and evidence is shown at this point anymore. Too much money, energy and politics have been invested in this scam and people are gonna want a ROI.
1200 global scientists recently made a statement that global warming is coming from increased photon activity on the sun coming out of a little ice age, and this has zip to do with carbon dioxide.
In the 1960s, I took 20 university credits of weather forecasting. My texts written by academics described that the photons from the sun and ions accumulate in the ionosphere and have a significant impact on the weather, which determines long-time climate, along with the jet stream, which we never hear about any more. As these accumulate, energy imbalances occur including buildups of heat. This is released in the form of lightning that brings these imbalances into the Schumann Resonance. Lightning is a form of EMF or electricity. If we have any true global warming, it is from man-made EMFs, wifi, bluetooth, cell phones, satellites, and HAARP's weather manipulations also from EMFs.
Certainly carbon is part of the life cycle. Animals exhale carbon dioxide that feeds the vegetative/tree world that exhales oxygen for animals in an automatic feedback loop that is self-sustaining. It is ridiculous to blame the life cycle and accuse it of climate change that will harm human sustainability.
In the 1980s, Rockefeller presented global warming concept from carbon dioxide at the Rockerfeller-sponsored Rio de Janerio conference without any peer review. Later, this was used as a scientifically proven cause, but the scientific proof never occurred. About 1994 a group of global academics using the same flawed computer models program said ground center for maximum impacts of global warming would be at Thunder Bay, Canada, based upon assumptions not proven. Monsanto Corporation which was voted as the most hated and most destructive organization in the USA for several years in row within the last two decades just happens to be owned by Bill Gates and Rockefeller, who are partners in population control. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for Population Control was the original name of that institution.
NOT TO WORRY. The climate-change folks apparently heard about this before we did, and they already have it under control.
According to a study published in Nature Climate Change on Aug. 29 (2 days ago), the conventional term "Greenland’s deglaciation", for which prediction models have suffered from multiple... er... "shortcomings", is to be replaced. It is now "Greenland ice imbalance".
Or to sound more scientific: "ice sheet disequilibrium".
Presumably for the same reasons "global warming" needed to morph to "climate change".
And behold -- these CC scientists have discovered that (a) it's "disequilibrium" and not "deglaciation" which is the real culprit for the global flooding that will surely happen this century; and (b) to avoid the disaster, we must control the "thickness perturbations" (the seasonal waxing and waning of ice) and "bring the current ice sheet into equilibrium with surface mass balance [later defined as snowfall accumulation minus runoff]."
That's right. We now need to keep Greenland's ice perfectly static, despite Winter's snowfall and Summer's runoff, in order to maintain a "committed sea level rise" (a mythical level not yet determined).
Short of controlling the behavior of all carbon-based species, plus controlling the weather both on earth and in the sun, I have no idea how such a goal could be achieved.
Neither do these researchers. All they are offering to do is set the future bar for Greenland ice sheet "equilibrium" and the ideal "sea-level rise" at some arbitrary level, with yet another computer model.
They will grade the success of this Quixotic effort not by tracking the Greenland ice, or by tracking sea levels, but by tracking how well humanity cooperates in taking the "necessary" measures.
When the whole thing fails, they can blame it on the polar bears and reindeer.
The only thing permanent is change, this includes the climate. Oh look, it’s raining today it was sunny yesterday, we’re all gonna die. Where’s my mask?
And if Ice sheets actually melting. The 99% would be told they are melting. I was told many years ago by a dear brother that the truth usually lies in the opposition direction than what you're told by by some folks.
climate change, CO2, polar bear extinction, plastic island in the middle of the Pacific the size of Texas. All psy-op lies: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/107-dr-patrick-moore-founder-of-greenpeace#details
💯🎯
🎯👋
Moore is wrong re Roundup is not toxic. Look up the toxic testimony and proof of serious disease determined by facts and evidence in US Courts. He's also wrong that nobody died in the USA from nuclear power. A worker was impaled into the ceiling of a Michigan nuclear reactor. Books listing data compilations of tens of thousands of deaths and deformed babies born from Chernobyl need to be read by Moore. I agree with his general info about global warming, which is the point being made here.
Yes you are right about roundup. The idea of allowing crop genetics modification to accommodate a pesticide was a horrible regulatory mistake. Your point about a single fatality does not address the general issue, however. Nuclear is super safe and Chernobyl standards were third world idiocy not ours. If we allow the global jackals to decrease “carbon use” we are murdering half of Africa and some of Europe. Nuclear is cheap, can be safe, and should not be equated w bombs.
Then we have Fukushima built with US technology from which has its radioactivity reaching the US's Western coast and now inside of much of our ocean food.
The science shows there is NO THRESHOLD BELOW WHICH ionizing radiation does not cause damage to cell membranes of living animals and humans. Any dosage damages. The question is "Can the body repair it fast enough?" The answer is "no" in today's unhealthy world.
If a person is deficient in nutrition, (due hugely to Bill Gates' widespread toxic Roundup or widespread GMO food products in the USA, each of which lowers 25%-75% of nutrients in the food), the body's natural ability to heal itself can't go through its necessary cascades; and damage results starting with the cell membranes which are vital for nutrients to feed the cell and for waste products to be eliminated from the cell. With enough membrane damage, repairs cannot occur occur insufficiently or not quick enough. That's the start of cancer and many other potentially lethal processes.
If the damage isn't repaired, the ionizing radiation disease takes over, likely shortening the lifespan.
This is very established non-controversial science proven during the Manhattan Project during and shortly after World War II for ionizing radiation which can be alpha, beta, or gamma radiation from nuclear power plants, depending on the isotopes. If the radiation is lodged inside the body from eating radioactive food, the body has serious exposure as it is now impossible to distance one-self from the radiation. If it is background radiation, harm or safety depends on the distance of the exposure, but we do not want radioactive elements floating around the environment or in our water or food. From cradle to grave, nuclear power costs more than all other forms of energy, and that is not counting the expenses of the unsolvable problem of the highly radioactive nuclear waste that will last hundreds of thousands of years without a safe storage place for that time period.
Roundup is horrible I agree and glyphosate. I agree with the you about the point on global warming. No emergency!
We are heading into a Grand Solar Minimum. Look it up. What it is and what will happen. CO2 is a trace gas that has almost no bearing on climate. Water Vapor is the most significant greenhouse gas, and the deep ocean current and the Sun have more bearing on climate. But CO2 and Nitrogen, the two main things plants need to grow, are outlawed. They want us DEAD
That just about covers it.
This is a thing that gets measured daily??? Someone tax dollars hard at work no doubt!!
Climatology is a Joke! - Kary Mullis, video posted 4 years ago.
https://youtu.be/Y1FnWFlDvxE
Doesn't matter how much proof and evidence is shown at this point anymore. Too much money, energy and politics have been invested in this scam and people are gonna want a ROI.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2009/10/07/scientist-carbon-dioxide-doesnt-cause-global-warming?fbclid=IwAR05yS3s6CeYgffT6dRO1_e9cjjSYkH9BExvpC3UbhH3JxjrKkfEZ8BmPrg
Caribou peed on the sensor again.
1200 global scientists recently made a statement that global warming is coming from increased photon activity on the sun coming out of a little ice age, and this has zip to do with carbon dioxide.
In the 1960s, I took 20 university credits of weather forecasting. My texts written by academics described that the photons from the sun and ions accumulate in the ionosphere and have a significant impact on the weather, which determines long-time climate, along with the jet stream, which we never hear about any more. As these accumulate, energy imbalances occur including buildups of heat. This is released in the form of lightning that brings these imbalances into the Schumann Resonance. Lightning is a form of EMF or electricity. If we have any true global warming, it is from man-made EMFs, wifi, bluetooth, cell phones, satellites, and HAARP's weather manipulations also from EMFs.
Certainly carbon is part of the life cycle. Animals exhale carbon dioxide that feeds the vegetative/tree world that exhales oxygen for animals in an automatic feedback loop that is self-sustaining. It is ridiculous to blame the life cycle and accuse it of climate change that will harm human sustainability.
In the 1980s, Rockefeller presented global warming concept from carbon dioxide at the Rockerfeller-sponsored Rio de Janerio conference without any peer review. Later, this was used as a scientifically proven cause, but the scientific proof never occurred. About 1994 a group of global academics using the same flawed computer models program said ground center for maximum impacts of global warming would be at Thunder Bay, Canada, based upon assumptions not proven. Monsanto Corporation which was voted as the most hated and most destructive organization in the USA for several years in row within the last two decades just happens to be owned by Bill Gates and Rockefeller, who are partners in population control. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for Population Control was the original name of that institution.
http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/
"See? Chemtrail spray is WORKING!"
NOT TO WORRY. The climate-change folks apparently heard about this before we did, and they already have it under control.
According to a study published in Nature Climate Change on Aug. 29 (2 days ago), the conventional term "Greenland’s deglaciation", for which prediction models have suffered from multiple... er... "shortcomings", is to be replaced. It is now "Greenland ice imbalance".
Or to sound more scientific: "ice sheet disequilibrium".
Presumably for the same reasons "global warming" needed to morph to "climate change".
And behold -- these CC scientists have discovered that (a) it's "disequilibrium" and not "deglaciation" which is the real culprit for the global flooding that will surely happen this century; and (b) to avoid the disaster, we must control the "thickness perturbations" (the seasonal waxing and waning of ice) and "bring the current ice sheet into equilibrium with surface mass balance [later defined as snowfall accumulation minus runoff]."
That's right. We now need to keep Greenland's ice perfectly static, despite Winter's snowfall and Summer's runoff, in order to maintain a "committed sea level rise" (a mythical level not yet determined).
Short of controlling the behavior of all carbon-based species, plus controlling the weather both on earth and in the sun, I have no idea how such a goal could be achieved.
Neither do these researchers. All they are offering to do is set the future bar for Greenland ice sheet "equilibrium" and the ideal "sea-level rise" at some arbitrary level, with yet another computer model.
They will grade the success of this Quixotic effort not by tracking the Greenland ice, or by tracking sea levels, but by tracking how well humanity cooperates in taking the "necessary" measures.
When the whole thing fails, they can blame it on the polar bears and reindeer.
The only thing permanent is change, this includes the climate. Oh look, it’s raining today it was sunny yesterday, we’re all gonna die. Where’s my mask?
And if Ice sheets actually melting. The 99% would be told they are melting. I was told many years ago by a dear brother that the truth usually lies in the opposition direction than what you're told by by some folks.
Got my comments all backwards again. Meant to say that if Ice sheets were actually melting. We'd be told that they were freezing.
I just tried to access http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/ and they are offline.
Could it be that interest in today's graph has resulted in the site being shut down?
Here's the Wayback Machine Aug 24 snapshot
https://web.archive.org/web/20220824042716/http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/
Thanks. This works for most of the polar portal site. But when I try to open Mass and Height Change, I get "Access is Forbidden".
But with 1.21 gigawatts of electrical power you can travel back in time...
If I had the option of time travel into the past. I don't think I'd bother returning to the present.