There's a problem with this data set: it's based on "cases". To get a "case" of duh Covid, you need a nose rape. One may reasonably assume that populations with lower clotshot uptake are also less likely to go get their noses raped every time they feel under the weather.
It is possible - tho by no means certain - this behavioral diffe…
There's a problem with this data set: it's based on "cases". To get a "case" of duh Covid, you need a nose rape. One may reasonably assume that populations with lower clotshot uptake are also less likely to go get their noses raped every time they feel under the weather.
It is possible - tho by no means certain - this behavioral difference could account for the difference in "case" rate even if the populations are experiencing similar levels of real illness.
I thought of that too, but it also occurred to me that many places that require the jab either for employment or simply entrance when they do grant some kind of exemption will usually require the unjabbed to be tested on a regular basis (weekly or even more often) or bring proof of a "negative" test to attend an event. Also schools will often have the rule that the unjabbed need to bring documentation of a negative test upon return if they are out sick or for some other reason. So yes, the jabbed are more likely to line up willingly for the test, but the unjabbed are more often forced to take them. I suspect it more than evens out.
There's a problem with this data set: it's based on "cases". To get a "case" of duh Covid, you need a nose rape. One may reasonably assume that populations with lower clotshot uptake are also less likely to go get their noses raped every time they feel under the weather.
It is possible - tho by no means certain - this behavioral difference could account for the difference in "case" rate even if the populations are experiencing similar levels of real illness.
I thought of that too, but it also occurred to me that many places that require the jab either for employment or simply entrance when they do grant some kind of exemption will usually require the unjabbed to be tested on a regular basis (weekly or even more often) or bring proof of a "negative" test to attend an event. Also schools will often have the rule that the unjabbed need to bring documentation of a negative test upon return if they are out sick or for some other reason. So yes, the jabbed are more likely to line up willingly for the test, but the unjabbed are more often forced to take them. I suspect it more than evens out.