36 Comments
User's avatar
VI P's avatar

Should have never happened to begin with

2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

That's the whole point really.

ChesterView's avatar

Glad that you included Gates in your list of criminals. He controls the WHO and that organization’s fingerprints are all over this debacle.

2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Yes, those are the obvious puppets. The real perpetrators will be next to impossible to go after directly given how deep in the shadows they operate, but they will be defeated.

KW NORTON's avatar

The real tentacles of this steep and deep planetary takeover contingent of kleptocrats are yes, the people who carry water for these puppeteers. The organizers planned well in orchestrating this coup. When other humans have a difficult time imagining the scope of a coup and the magnitude of the evil being perpetrated it becomes harder to defeat. They will fail and be defeated but it will take lots of times and resources.

Denise Zapf's avatar

Much of this opinion scares me. It implies that if everyone (public employees, private employees, athletes) had been treated the same, the Order could have been upheld. It also implies that temporary orders would have been okay...but you can't be temporarily injected. I'm not so sure we should celebrate yet.

2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Agreed.

But since the mandates have so many errors in law and logic, it is a win.

Could this decision be setting up ever more draconian mandates for the upcoming "pandemic?" Yes, it very well could be, but at some point this all falls apart badly.

SomeDude's avatar

I was thinking the same thing. the most positive aspect of the ruling in my opinion is stating the injections don't prevent infection.

Michael Myers's avatar

You could be right. I read it as β€œif this were actually about safety and public health, then why not include everyone?” Not.. β€œit would’ve been fine if everyone was included.” Hope I’m right and you’re wrong πŸ˜€

Hugh Petersen's avatar

We all know the truth regarding the shots but the lies and propaganda are continuing. There was a segment on the local news this morning on reactions after taking the shot and they are still saying that the reactions show the shot is working. I sent the author of this Substack a photo of a woman vomiting and, after first being diagnosed with food poisoning, now her doctors are telling her she has vertigo and it has nothing to do with the shot. Well, the symptoms started 2 days after her injection. On top of this her blood pressure is through the roof. Just because we understand the truth doesn’t mean it’s still not being suppressed.

Bianca Kennedy's avatar

I was having one of those days of feeling completely defeated...and this article and news has lifted my spirits! Thank you : )

Jerms 9654's avatar

Finally some good news.

Lee Muller's avatar

I posted the following this morning.

List of Candidates Standing for Health Freedom

Arguably, the most important issue on the 2022 ballot

https://leemuller.substack.com/p/list-of-candidates-standing-for-health

All of this can be found at the Stand for Health Freedom web site, but I formatted for quick reference by way of text links by state. It is imperative people contact candidates to fill out the survey to be listed on this web site to get more votes! There are several states (including NY!) that have none listed and it's important to cover those states as well!

pandelis's avatar

what about the hunderds of millions of americans who got vaccinated and boosted?

they followed CDC, FDA, NIH, pfizer, moderna ... put their trust on them.

2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Of course, that goes without saying.

All of these agencies will get their lawsuits soon enough; it will be slow, but justice will eventually be served.

pandelis's avatar

lets hope it will restore their health too.

Laura Noncomplier's avatar

I wouldn’t be so quick to believe that story

pandelis's avatar

thats what they claim ... FDA approved, under trump pandemic emergency decree still ruling the land.

SomeDude's avatar

trump pandemic emergency decree which has been renewed every 90 days by the current figurehead. the Donald may have signed it first, but an ethical regime would've ended it immediately on taking power. instead it's been used for multiple executive orders thrown out in court later after legal challenges finally trickle through the system

pandelis's avatar

Covfefe ... your idol knew everything about it, and kept pushing people to get vaxxed.

do you have any photo, video of trimp or his familly getting the jab??

stop waiting for princ charming to save you ... none is coming, you are on your own ... trimp is not your friend.

Laura Noncomplier's avatar

Isn’t it also a handy-dandy mRNA serum?

Lex Weiser's avatar

I'm amazed that the notoriously corrupt New York courts actually delivered a decent verdict. Hopefully a good sign!

Robert Yoho, MD's avatar

Breaking the censorsβ€”that’s the critical project of the age. Thank you for your service. Click the link for an advanced draft copy of my new book about what is going on, Cassandra’s Memo, COVID and the Global Psychopaths. I will distribute it free. https://pr.bookfunnel.com/jfbafaf All comments and critiques are appreciated.

Lawyerlisa's avatar

In Ontario physicians are ordered to consider medicating an antivaccer or sending them to psychotherapy. Lawyrlisa analyzes the decision of the Honorable Justice Porzio in that context. https://youtu.be/lPGmD5H4XhM

Dooglio's avatar

β€œAt that point BigPharma will be sued into oblivion.”

That will be a beautiful thing to behold.

NightFlight's avatar

Too little, Too late? Slow and Fine and these democide lunatics will use every last dime of taxpayer blood and appeal these capricious dictates until just like Mashed Potato Brains pushing for nuclear war; they have killed every last one of us through one means or another.

🀑🌎's avatar

The perpetrators lost their court case? Fuck em

In all honestly though, we need to pounce

ChesterView's avatar

You should put in the body of the article the specifics of the judicial proceeding: the plaintiff, the defendant, the venue (the court and judge), and the specific decision of the judge. I know it is in the link of the tweet but the reader should not have to go there.

2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Next you will ask me to masticate your meals for you.

AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Readers are readers and can handle clicking one more time to get more details. This article is pretty thorough already. Don’t be so... demanding. Please? We’ve had enough of β€œdemanding” the last few. I’d rather have another new article get started. When will it be finished already β€œ Second smartest..”?! πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ See what I did there?! πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Totally kidding. But.. would love to hear any updates about kid’s vaccine school schedule decisions. And suggestions to stop the madness? We ARE a demanding bunch! Thanks for all you do in keeping us informed. ( is next one done yet?) sorry Chester, I’m crabby & judgmental in the morning. 🌈 You’re good.

ChesterView's avatar

Since you have the burden of living in Seattle you are forgiven. πŸ˜‰