There’s a lot of evil stuff going on right now in MSM that’s NOT laughable. We need to speak up and counter it.
However, this contention, the idea that the jabbed need to be concerned about the unjabbed? This is hugely laughable.
Ok, so they got these shots, they have to keep on getting these shots, to supposedly have some sort of “protection” against severe disease (not even protection that’s real) and against transmission of a disease that cannot be prevented from transmitting by these jabs. this report (and the very recent Canadian one that has been referenced on Kirsch and on Gato’s stacks) both are implying and even stating like opinion pieces (at least the Canadian one read like an opinion piece, an op ed, not a science paper), that the jabbed should be cautious (implying fearful) around the unjabbed.
Really? LOL!!!!!
So I have a question for them: why’d you get jabbed?
There’s a lot of evil stuff going on right now in MSM that’s NOT laughable. We need to speak up and counter it.
However, this contention, the idea that the jabbed need to be concerned about the unjabbed? This is hugely laughable.
Ok, so they got these shots, they have to keep on getting these shots, to supposedly have some sort of “protection” against severe disease (not even protection that’s real) and against transmission of a disease that cannot be prevented from transmitting by these jabs. this report (and the very recent Canadian one that has been referenced on Kirsch and on Gato’s stacks) both are implying and even stating like opinion pieces (at least the Canadian one read like an opinion piece, an op ed, not a science paper), that the jabbed should be cautious (implying fearful) around the unjabbed.
Really? LOL!!!!!
So I have a question for them: why’d you get jabbed?