22 Comments
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

Great video. "they're willing to enforce these ideological codes even if it means sacrificing the future of those boys and those girls." Given what we know of the plandemic, I wonder if sacrificing the future of those boys and girls is the entire point.

Expand full comment
author

Precisely. As I wrote, these cultural and medical and governmental policy schemes flow in and out of each other.

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

Take down all elitists that thinks they are superior to all of us.

Start from scratch and bring back the nuclear family. Do away with all the planned parenthood shit that eugenics installed and let people be people and decide their lives for themselves without handouts from evildoers that does not have a soul but stamps us, We the people as cockroaches.

All the things elitism has invented turns to shit and is to gain for the few.

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

"This is not just about black people, it is about using all colors and races to perpetuate mental slavery for all. The skin color is irrelevant, only the social security identifier counts." YES and you could substitute any identity group, I feel.

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

You forgot misogynist. Though it's increasingly difficult to be a good misogynist with the ever-changing, nebulous definition of "women."

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

To me the sexuality/gender spectrum is a real thing that exists in nature but has been hijacked by the program. When society is accepting of differences that occur across the spectrum, fewer people will want to change their gender. The manipulation is real, the attempt to make people what they are not, to basically abduct people into the cult is real, but indigenous cultures have 4 genders and I know many wonderful people who are gay, bi pan a sexual. People who go "trans" have a distortion I can feel energetically, but people who's mix of masc/fem is innate are confusing to those who require boxes to put people in, but their energy is often great!

Expand full comment

Spectrum? Boxes? Oh please. No confusion here. I'm not playing the left's game. In it's quest to destroy the West (who's talking about indigenous cultures?), they're trying to erase women (and men). I am a woman, an adult female human, born with the software already loaded, just like everyone else. Gender dysphoria does not allow a man to be female. Being a tomboy did not make me a boy. I gave birth to a pack of children and fed them from my own body. That requires no prefix, and no declared pronouns, I do not have to play along with the delusion of some men that they can do these things too. Language has genders, animals have sexes. Many moons ago, I had lots of friends who were gay and others in various stages of transitioning, they called themselves "trannies," not women, and sadly, they're dead, thanks to Fauci's first go-round with AIDS. I miss them dearly. Most of these people just want to live their lives quietly, and I wish they could, but somebody🤔 insists on militantly shoving their delusions down our throats, and worse, down children's throats. I don't care what people call themselves, but they had better not expect me to adopt their language or their lies. This is part of the game.

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

Well said!

Expand full comment

I am sorry you lost friends and that Fauci is a dick. Our language is quite limited. Indigenous language has words for people who experience things a bit differently. The best way to support people is to call out the agenda without slaughtering innocent people in the process. This involves some sensitivity.

Expand full comment

🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

"as someone with strong ties to the inner cities of NYC"

that's cute. i really do respect you ... and this comes from 1st smart guy in the whole world :)

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

as my contribution to your great blog and efforts, here is my recommendation - ms erica kahn ... she is a contributor to rense, very knowlegeable, MIT graduate, nano expert ... most importantly a good person ... in my book that is. thanks for all your efforts!!

https://mediaarchives.gsradio.net/rense/special/rense_032822_hr2.mp3

Expand full comment
author

thank you.

Expand full comment

Great post. Free market WITHOUT shareholder capitalism will do the job. As long as shareholders exist, corruption will hijack natural capitalism until our consciousness outgrows exploitative profit.

Expand full comment
author

More complex than shareholder "capitalism."

"Neo-classic economics conceptualizes economics as path-independent. An EFFICIENT MARKET is path-independent, as is a market with a single, stable equilibrium. In a path-independent system, it should be impossible to make money purely by trading, WITHOUT PRODUCING ANYTHING OF VALUE. That sort of activity is called arbitrage, and basic financial theory holds that in an efficient market arbitrage is impossible, because everything is already priced in such a way that there are no inconsistencies. You cannot trade dollars for yen, trade those for euros, back to dollars and make a profit. Nonetheless hedge funds and investment banks have made fortunes trading currency markets. Their success should be impossible in an efficient market but this does not seem to have bothered economics theorists."

Expand full comment

You're losing me, I'm afraid, but to me, and I'd love your feedback, preferably in lay language - but it seems to be that having stakeholders creates disloyalty to the end user and incentives for deception, cheap products that are marketed well and choosing cheap labor over healthy, happy employees, who in turn will make better products and services. So it seems to me if you just have the person with the business and their employees and their customer, the relationship itself creates capitalism in a benevolent, symbiotic ways where one produces what they other wants/ needs, and the customer holds the business accountable for integrity, quality, innovation and values.

Expand full comment

Instead of "profit" for a "company" - treating a company as a "person" - if all "profit" just went to the business owner and their employees or was reinvested in community, R&D etc, it seems better to me than having stakeholders who would put profit above the wellbeing of the product/service recipient. Of course some owners and employees may want to cut corners, but the customer will see this and be able to use capitalism to hold them accountable....by not buying their product - whereas WEF wants ALL stakeholder capitalism where they create our desires and control all parameters and loyalty is to shareholders/stakeholders rather than the TRUE stakeholders, which are the creators and beneficiaries of what is created. In nature trees and mammals a symbiotic system, as are many trees and mycelium - they each perform a roll that benefits the other and in turn receive benefit from the other.

Expand full comment
author

a private company just like a private person can do as they see fit. a publicly traded company has different parameters, but ultimately less gov and regulations and zero taxation sorts everything out.

Glass-Steagall Act and Sherman Antitrust Act would be the bare minimus....

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022·edited Mar 31, 2022

How does that fit in with your thoughts on my reflections? It seems like without removing the shareholder principle, you get big companies swallowing smaller ones rather than true competition of products, services, ideas...

Expand full comment
author

a broad topic....maybe a substack post one day in the future...

Expand full comment

Yes, Trump-economics, if properly unleashed would result in the government becoming essentially irrelevant in a decade or so, although they would have 200% more money to spend, they would fall to less than 5% of the economy.

Such a scenario must incredibly frighten these power mad psychopath perverts.

Expand full comment