Women are the special targets of the eugenics movement. This mRNA gene therapy masquerading falsely as a "vaccine" with syncytin-1 in the lipid nanoparticle of the spike protein is lethal for fetuses and often for the pregnant women.
Another example supporting women as special targets is shown in Bill Gates previous experimental target…
Women are the special targets of the eugenics movement. This mRNA gene therapy masquerading falsely as a "vaccine" with syncytin-1 in the lipid nanoparticle of the spike protein is lethal for fetuses and often for the pregnant women.
Another example supporting women as special targets is shown in Bill Gates previous experimental targets in Africa with syncytin-1 linked to miscarriages and infertility striking down almost all births.
The Trans movement in the USA seeks to remove female sex considerations in the doctor's offices and on the intake and recording forms--the data collection forms. This appears to include bully demands being made over the best interests of natural born females who are measurably biologically different with different pathways and chemicals, especially hormone messengers. Naturally born women's health data collection is critical to having access to the ability to identify trends in adverse symptoms that are the signals to timely investigate or to timely recall bad products. Without this information, naturally born women will not have the same early warnings for safer choices that uniquely apply to hormone and reproductive functions as well as different genes than anyone born as a male.
Feminists (naturally born women both straight and lesbian) worked very hard to get women into the medical studies in the 1980s and 1990s because the "safe and efficacy" claims prior to that were based primarily on studies with overwhelmingly male data historically, given it was commonly viewed too risky to experiment on women who could become pregnant and on pregnant women.
Now, scientific data collection for women is once again being threatened politically from more than one direction simultaneously.
We must insist that medical experiments in general must return to the previous rigorous scientific standard data collection of safety signals over long-term testing with traditional Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials with rigor at every step. Such scientific rigor takes from 7 years with existing technology and 14-15 years with new technology. We need to define some stopping points, too.
Women are the special targets of the eugenics movement. This mRNA gene therapy masquerading falsely as a "vaccine" with syncytin-1 in the lipid nanoparticle of the spike protein is lethal for fetuses and often for the pregnant women.
Another example supporting women as special targets is shown in Bill Gates previous experimental targets in Africa with syncytin-1 linked to miscarriages and infertility striking down almost all births.
The Trans movement in the USA seeks to remove female sex considerations in the doctor's offices and on the intake and recording forms--the data collection forms. This appears to include bully demands being made over the best interests of natural born females who are measurably biologically different with different pathways and chemicals, especially hormone messengers. Naturally born women's health data collection is critical to having access to the ability to identify trends in adverse symptoms that are the signals to timely investigate or to timely recall bad products. Without this information, naturally born women will not have the same early warnings for safer choices that uniquely apply to hormone and reproductive functions as well as different genes than anyone born as a male.
Feminists (naturally born women both straight and lesbian) worked very hard to get women into the medical studies in the 1980s and 1990s because the "safe and efficacy" claims prior to that were based primarily on studies with overwhelmingly male data historically, given it was commonly viewed too risky to experiment on women who could become pregnant and on pregnant women.
Now, scientific data collection for women is once again being threatened politically from more than one direction simultaneously.
We must insist that medical experiments in general must return to the previous rigorous scientific standard data collection of safety signals over long-term testing with traditional Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials with rigor at every step. Such scientific rigor takes from 7 years with existing technology and 14-15 years with new technology. We need to define some stopping points, too.