Share this comment
May I please suggest you consider the information at losthorizons.com? I and several hundred thousand other honest, law-abiding American citizens have received 100% tax refunds by merely rebutting the fraudulent information returns issued by non-federal payers when filing tax returns. Over 2 billion dollars in 100% tax refunds from not o…
May I please suggest you consider the information at LostHorizons.com? I and several hundred thousand other honest, law-abiding American citizens have received 100% tax refunds by merely rebutting the fraudulent information returns issued by non-federal payers when filing tax returns. Over 2 billion dollars in 100% tax refunds from not only the IRS but 38 state governments have been secured by readers of this website over the last 20 years who have distinguished between income and non-income receipts. You may find that upon carefully studying the information at this website that the income tax in the US is entirely constitutional but has been misapplied on a grand scale to the non-federal private sector since the 1940s. How the fraud had been perpetrated was not clearly understood until 2003 when the author of this website became the first American in US history to get a 100% refund of all funds withheld from his paycheck including federal income tax social Security and Medicare. Since he wrote his book in 2003 now and about the 16th edition, hundreds of thousands of honest law-abiding Americans have duplicated his efforts by rebutting in a legally meaningful manner the fraudulent 1099s and fraudulent W-2s issued by private sector payroll departments.
Respectfully,
Brian Harriss
HighTestBullBeef.com
Harlem, GA
Ultimately it is legal to collect taxes. Will find the code. They also do a good job of collecting monies not themselves but through third party entities.
Reread the article.
The 16th Amendment is perfectly legal. But it only applies to the D.C.
Poke around this website for all the reasons why most are not required to pay FIT.
https://weissparis.com/jurisdiction.html
Thanks for the article, which I read and don't dispute. Assuming the government knows it has a problem in the wording of the tax code, why don't they just fix the wording?
You can't reword the 16th Amendment.
All direct taxes must be subject to the Rule of Apportionment.
The Constitution doesn't apply in the District of Columbia so those residents can be taxed with no regard for the Rule of Apportionment.
The collection is done via constructive fraud; whereby private sector payroll departments are bullied and coerced into pretending to be "Withholding Agents" by misleading publications by the IRS, designed to dupe these lackeys who neither read nor understand the legal terms contained in these publications. And these IRS publications do not carry the weight of law. A "withholding agent" is defined in 26 USC Sections 1441-1443 as anyone required by law to withhold from foreign nationals or two types of foreign entities. As a matter of law, all information returns (W-2s, 1099s, etc.) issued by nonfederal, private payroll departments are fraudulent because they are issued in defiance of the reporting requirements of 26 USC Section 6051, which requires only "wages as defined...", in two other sections of the code, be reported. And those sections that define "wages" are primarily a list of exemptions of types of payments from federal employers to federal employees which are excluded from the definition of "wages". 26 USC 7434 provides for civil damages for fraudulent information returns against such private sector payers who libel you with such fraudulent information returns. I am not yet aware of any one who has litigated with this provision of law against a payer. At this point, after litigating 5 cases as a plaintiff for 10 years, having taken two cases to the US Supreme Court and having observed evidence of corruption, bribes, and money-laundering by federal judges, I entertain no false notions of ever getting justice from this thoroughly infiltrated (by communists), corrupt, dying nation.
Hi, Brian
26 CFR 1.1-1a tells us a national is NOT taxed (except for 871 b and 877 b).
What throws a reader is that the status of national is labeled "non-resident alien individual", which, EVERYWHERE ELSE in the CFR DOES mean a foreigner!
I am a national since 2017 and not a peep from IRS since.
My employer fumbled my W-4 exempt status last year so I just recently filed the Form 1040-NR, with all zeroes except for my refund of $1632.53.
exposethematrix.com for more info
I have an acquaintance who has done much research into changing his status and he has talked about the Buck Act. I never refer to my payer as an employer, since employer is another deceptive term of art defined in Title 26 as someone who "employs" an "employee", again as defined in Title 26. But I've found it difficult, despite having superior knowledge of the Tax Code, to find payroll managers willing to listen to anyone but their paid liars whether misinformed Tax Attorneys (shills) or ignorant, misinformed CPAs (most trained/programmed by the IRS) and, of course, the dishonest IRS. Sadly most people would rather follow habits than learn something new and correct that might reveal they have been doing something wrong for a very long time. I haven't found any company that I can work for that is not entranced into requiring a W-4. So I have submitted a qualified W-4 with an affidavit on the reverse side and a reference to the affidavit beside my signature along with a stern warning letter. But once you allow theft by conversion, that is civil conversion, where a misinformed and/or dishonest payer hands over your money to the IRS, even though they are not a withholding agent, it is, more often than not, difficult to correct the fraudulent W-2s and oblige the IRS to return your property. There are hundreds of thousands of examples of the IRS returning property, and one such example of mine with the state of Georgia returning all withholdings (overpayments) on public display at LostHorizons.com, when one properly rebuts the fraudulent W-2s or 1099s, but it is by far the best for them to never get their greedy hands on property that never was theirs in the first place. Working for a living in the private sector is an untaxable right, and is no exercise of federal privilege or excise taxable economic activity, and payers should not be libeling people in the private sector with such fraudulent information returns nor burdening them with illegal withholding against payments that have nothing to do with federal income. If the enforcement of the limits of the federal income tax is not adhered to sooner rather than later by an informed populace, the problem will eventually get resolved by violence, which is the worst way and final resort to resolve the repeated violation of natural law.
Thank you Mr. Harriss
exposethematrix.com
You're welcome!
The whole system is based on constructive fraud.
The IRS "collection" via lien, levy, seizure, garnishment is TOTALLY legal against the "U.S. citizen/resident" BUT NOT against the national who has not volunteered to be a "taxpayer" via the W-4.
Such is the teeth of the Babylonian Talmudic UCC Merchant Law of the Code of Federal Regulations. The 1040 is the Shetar.