OK, maybe I'm ahead of the curve more than I thought - as an inconcise listing: players on the throttling of free speech include CIA, USAID, NED, Operation Gladio, Gannett, EU, UN, NATO, WHO, WEF, IMF, multiple European Royal families, including the British Empire elites of the City of London, and the Soros family, among many others. Sources for all to consider: Myron Fagan, William Cooper, Q, Mike Benz, Promethean Updates, as well as multiple social media accounts that at one time or another have had to create multiple accounts due to censorship... As I said, inconcise listing... I believe a concise listing would blow too many minds, even now...
MORE KNOWN NAMES COME TO MIND: Financial Times, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Economist, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Schwabb, Fauci, Collins, Birx, in some cases TED talks (more so lately than earlier), the Guardian, ... I think y'all are getting the picture, add anything or anyone you feel I have left out
They have to clamp down on free speech, because "free speech" is outing their plans: a digital gulag, including digital ID, CBDCs and facial recognition/ real time tracking.
They can't get rid of the internet-- part of their digital gulag-- so they get rid of free speech so they can implement their plan without people discussing the implications.
The US may have to ‘Monroe Doctrine’ our Internet and then move to save our brothers in conquered lands, e.g., England, Ireland, essentially the rest of the Western Civilization as it was once known.
It might be too late. But a hugely interesting piece was posted by Simplicious this morning outlining how current US policy is veering toward recognizing Europe and its political leaders as potentially unreliable allies due to the erosion of their national identities and the dismantling of basic free speech rights. I never thought I would see elements of the US government acknowledge this. But the same globalist actors are here among us so that’s why I think it may be too late.
It is definitely forcing the sovereignty questions of the internet - blocking countries doesn't do any good as VPN gets around that, so will they attack VPNs next by regulating VPNs???
I use VPN. Substack is asking me to verify my age to see chats, and I don’t live in or path through the U.K. Never have. My VPN is in, and used in, the USA. The solution to their VPN problem is that they identify IP addresses used by VPNs and block the VPNs and chase after the VPN companies with laws and lawsuits and fines. The only reason I see why I’ve been blocked for ‘underaged content’ is because of my VPN choice. Getting Substack to fix it is no easy feat.
Which is a LOT of work - some do not disclose their VPNs to govts, so they have to actually sign up for one, though from what I am hearing, many VPN companies have already blocked govt IPs from doing that. There are still 99 ways to skin that cat, and they will find a way.
My research on David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission when I was an undergrad for a professor of political science who had her Ph.D. garnered me an A. It's now a book for which there are comments here: https://arlenejohnson.livejournal.com If interested in owning your own copy of my hardbound book send me an Email using a@truedemocracy.net for ordering instructions. I actually added to the literature.
Brilliant analysis connecting teh Berlin Forum revelations to domestic operations. What's particularly unsettling is that transnational regulatory capture basically bypasses our entire constitutional structure without a single vote. The EU's Digital Services Act becomes the de facto speech code for American platforms, whcih means sovereignty gets outsourced through compliance departments rather than overthrown through legislation.
OK, maybe I'm ahead of the curve more than I thought - as an inconcise listing: players on the throttling of free speech include CIA, USAID, NED, Operation Gladio, Gannett, EU, UN, NATO, WHO, WEF, IMF, multiple European Royal families, including the British Empire elites of the City of London, and the Soros family, among many others. Sources for all to consider: Myron Fagan, William Cooper, Q, Mike Benz, Promethean Updates, as well as multiple social media accounts that at one time or another have had to create multiple accounts due to censorship... As I said, inconcise listing... I believe a concise listing would blow too many minds, even now...
MORE KNOWN NAMES COME TO MIND: Financial Times, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Economist, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Schwabb, Fauci, Collins, Birx, in some cases TED talks (more so lately than earlier), the Guardian, ... I think y'all are getting the picture, add anything or anyone you feel I have left out
They have to clamp down on free speech, because "free speech" is outing their plans: a digital gulag, including digital ID, CBDCs and facial recognition/ real time tracking.
They can't get rid of the internet-- part of their digital gulag-- so they get rid of free speech so they can implement their plan without people discussing the implications.
The US may have to ‘Monroe Doctrine’ our Internet and then move to save our brothers in conquered lands, e.g., England, Ireland, essentially the rest of the Western Civilization as it was once known.
It might be too late. But a hugely interesting piece was posted by Simplicious this morning outlining how current US policy is veering toward recognizing Europe and its political leaders as potentially unreliable allies due to the erosion of their national identities and the dismantling of basic free speech rights. I never thought I would see elements of the US government acknowledge this. But the same globalist actors are here among us so that’s why I think it may be too late.
President Trump released that documentation on Friday morning -
https://newsletter.decisiveliberty.news/p/trumps-warning-to-europe-civilizational
It is definitely forcing the sovereignty questions of the internet - blocking countries doesn't do any good as VPN gets around that, so will they attack VPNs next by regulating VPNs???
I use VPN. Substack is asking me to verify my age to see chats, and I don’t live in or path through the U.K. Never have. My VPN is in, and used in, the USA. The solution to their VPN problem is that they identify IP addresses used by VPNs and block the VPNs and chase after the VPN companies with laws and lawsuits and fines. The only reason I see why I’ve been blocked for ‘underaged content’ is because of my VPN choice. Getting Substack to fix it is no easy feat.
Which is a LOT of work - some do not disclose their VPNs to govts, so they have to actually sign up for one, though from what I am hearing, many VPN companies have already blocked govt IPs from doing that. There are still 99 ways to skin that cat, and they will find a way.
My research on David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission when I was an undergrad for a professor of political science who had her Ph.D. garnered me an A. It's now a book for which there are comments here: https://arlenejohnson.livejournal.com If interested in owning your own copy of my hardbound book send me an Email using a@truedemocracy.net for ordering instructions. I actually added to the literature.
Brilliant analysis connecting teh Berlin Forum revelations to domestic operations. What's particularly unsettling is that transnational regulatory capture basically bypasses our entire constitutional structure without a single vote. The EU's Digital Services Act becomes the de facto speech code for American platforms, whcih means sovereignty gets outsourced through compliance departments rather than overthrown through legislation.
The only thing surprising about that is that the person making this announcement has not been arrested. Yet.