Correct, they are contradictory because they are composed of human beings who are as a whole inherently hypocritical. MAHA is a reflection of us. How many people do you know in your personal circle who also "talk out of both sides of their mouth"? Including oneself? Before I point one finger outward, I see three are pointed back in my own direction, by the way.
It be Yin-Yang, ya'll:
Take for instance Merck. That pharmaceutical manufacturer saved perhaps millions upon millions from debilitating diseases -- they developed Ivermectin -- yet killed at least 60,000 with Vioxx. That drug was eventually pulled off the market in 2004. Their executives faced zero culpability or accountability (watch the Rumble link I posted with Dr Malhotra).
Compassion and cruelty can coexist within the same human being and often do. Same goes within the same corporation, private organization, public institution, governmental agency or wherever humans congregate. It is ultimately a fractal mirror of us. Not just the body politic but the body psychologic and physiologic; you are as you think and act, not merely "vote" or talk via ballot.
To us it seems that MAHA is the ultimate paradox. But is it really surprising? The power elites are responding in this manner because of the overwhelming, in some form or fashion, pushback -- probably 50% of the population is against, or has some sort of reservation regarding, the mRNA jabs specifically and vaccines generally, which still means roughly half the population is still composed of NPC normies, and thus they are served accordingly.
An aside: thanks 2SG for continuing "the good half" of Merck vis a vis Petmectin!
It’s really not good enough. They must indefinitely ban any form of mRNA jabs at all levels. Full stop. To say it is good news that HHS is recommending not taking poison, removing it from the childhood schedule blah blah, still leaves discretion for other levels of institutional capture to push these biological weapons. It’s grotesque.
If they can get pregnant women to take it, then every child that they deliver will be at risk. In the next generation, there will be no need to foist the cancer-causing jabs on anyone. They will have already been administered in the womb.
I know someone who managed some of the Pfi$er CV vaxx clinical trials. She was super excited to be part of it ("We're saving humanity!!!") and admitted that the goal was the have babies born with the spike protein already inside of them, so they'd be naturally immune to C0VID.
Wow! People who are managing things and have no discernment. Anyone that had any sense could see that it was not a threat to humanity. People would have been dropping dead on the streets. Every time I went to the store, I asked myself why there weren't hazmat bins all over the place to dispose of the used disease-ridden masks.
Apparently, discernment goes out the window when your "income" is involved.
Anecdotally, the aforementioned person was totally against the vaxx when Trump was in office. Said it was sketchy, there was no research on it and she wasn't taking it. Then Xiden got elected and she was 110% in.
And yes, she is vaxxed (Moderna), her son supposedly has long CV, she's sick constantly and... here's the kicker... she had CV before she got vaxxed, so she had natural immunity that she wrecked.
That will never happen!! Too much money involved for these rats in D.C. to pull anything that is beholden to stock holders in Big Pharma!! These scum bags DemonRats and RepubTurds love their War's and their Big Pharma drug investments just go to www.CapitolTrades.com and see how your favorite Congressman and women love to trade their stocks based on their votes for laws.
They gonna do anything to get rid of the free pass PharmaCos get on damages done by their 'medicine'? Has anyone else looked into the John D Rockefeller-Arbraham Flexner-Johns Hopkins pharmaceuticals history? Flexner's writing are in the public domain.
Why put the qualifier “routine” in the comment? If you listen to the FDA, Makary is saying he would like to get back to the gold standard of testing to prove to the public these are safe and effective. So his point is they won’t just rubber stamp a (routine) new jab without clinical testing (an admission that is what they have been doing for years). Sure seems like there are always a lot of qualifiers in the MAHA comments and the real goal as stated is to gain back trust and continue to increase vaccination rates. Makary even said in a CBS interview people have natural immunity, well then why take a shot anyway?! Then he went on to push non mRNA for those with problems with mRNA. What is the likelihood this fall they will miraculously have some approved shots based on “gold standard” clinical trials. Another qualifier they use is “healthy” children. So unhealthy children will have these pushed on them? Carefully chosen statements that leave a lot of options open.
Yes. Not enough. IMO, deliberately. And I wonder how great someone who trustingly got the jab will/would feel if they continued to trust and get jabbed, and then boom! mRNA pulled. Like the soldiers still dying whilst peace talks are going on, I expect. Also wonder if all the folks who are okay with the microscopic steps would step up and get jabbed if, by some miracle of "testing", mRNA jabs are declared safe? would they rush down to CVS and get in line? Been wondering about that. Money where their mouth is, so to speak. Hey, get another booster! You'll be FINE!
Wheres all the Dads that lost children to this scourge? Thats what I wanna know. If it was my daughter they would have thought RAMBO just destroyed their world by the thousands. Every last one of them
They are doing this at the same time they MAHA are promoting universal flu vaccines and personalized cancer clot shots.
MAHA talks out both sides of mouth.
MAHA does not have full control yet.
Yeah, trust the plan. Kind of hard to do right now…
Trust? No. MAHA is a tiny band trying to turn a massive ship! We shall see. Under the authority of a Vaxxxadent!
Correct, they are contradictory because they are composed of human beings who are as a whole inherently hypocritical. MAHA is a reflection of us. How many people do you know in your personal circle who also "talk out of both sides of their mouth"? Including oneself? Before I point one finger outward, I see three are pointed back in my own direction, by the way.
It be Yin-Yang, ya'll:
Take for instance Merck. That pharmaceutical manufacturer saved perhaps millions upon millions from debilitating diseases -- they developed Ivermectin -- yet killed at least 60,000 with Vioxx. That drug was eventually pulled off the market in 2004. Their executives faced zero culpability or accountability (watch the Rumble link I posted with Dr Malhotra).
Compassion and cruelty can coexist within the same human being and often do. Same goes within the same corporation, private organization, public institution, governmental agency or wherever humans congregate. It is ultimately a fractal mirror of us. Not just the body politic but the body psychologic and physiologic; you are as you think and act, not merely "vote" or talk via ballot.
To us it seems that MAHA is the ultimate paradox. But is it really surprising? The power elites are responding in this manner because of the overwhelming, in some form or fashion, pushback -- probably 50% of the population is against, or has some sort of reservation regarding, the mRNA jabs specifically and vaccines generally, which still means roughly half the population is still composed of NPC normies, and thus they are served accordingly.
An aside: thanks 2SG for continuing "the good half" of Merck vis a vis Petmectin!
It’s really not good enough. They must indefinitely ban any form of mRNA jabs at all levels. Full stop. To say it is good news that HHS is recommending not taking poison, removing it from the childhood schedule blah blah, still leaves discretion for other levels of institutional capture to push these biological weapons. It’s grotesque.
Why leave out Men? This is really bizarre.
If they can get pregnant women to take it, then every child that they deliver will be at risk. In the next generation, there will be no need to foist the cancer-causing jabs on anyone. They will have already been administered in the womb.
2 for 1.
Exactly!
I know someone who managed some of the Pfi$er CV vaxx clinical trials. She was super excited to be part of it ("We're saving humanity!!!") and admitted that the goal was the have babies born with the spike protein already inside of them, so they'd be naturally immune to C0VID.
Wow! People who are managing things and have no discernment. Anyone that had any sense could see that it was not a threat to humanity. People would have been dropping dead on the streets. Every time I went to the store, I asked myself why there weren't hazmat bins all over the place to dispose of the used disease-ridden masks.
Apparently, discernment goes out the window when your "income" is involved.
Anecdotally, the aforementioned person was totally against the vaxx when Trump was in office. Said it was sketchy, there was no research on it and she wasn't taking it. Then Xiden got elected and she was 110% in.
And yes, she is vaxxed (Moderna), her son supposedly has long CV, she's sick constantly and... here's the kicker... she had CV before she got vaxxed, so she had natural immunity that she wrecked.
If people had stood up against it in droves from the beginning, there wouldn't have been the lockdowns, mandates, etc.
As far as taking the jab, there's no accounting for stupidity!!
That will never happen!! Too much money involved for these rats in D.C. to pull anything that is beholden to stock holders in Big Pharma!! These scum bags DemonRats and RepubTurds love their War's and their Big Pharma drug investments just go to www.CapitolTrades.com and see how your favorite Congressman and women love to trade their stocks based on their votes for laws.
They gonna do anything to get rid of the free pass PharmaCos get on damages done by their 'medicine'? Has anyone else looked into the John D Rockefeller-Arbraham Flexner-Johns Hopkins pharmaceuticals history? Flexner's writing are in the public domain.
No, of course not. At least not in the foreseeable future.
Yes, it's all out there. Doesn't make a difference to the other half (liberal estimate) of the population.
as others have said, moratorium or bust!
Promises, promises.....
Why put the qualifier “routine” in the comment? If you listen to the FDA, Makary is saying he would like to get back to the gold standard of testing to prove to the public these are safe and effective. So his point is they won’t just rubber stamp a (routine) new jab without clinical testing (an admission that is what they have been doing for years). Sure seems like there are always a lot of qualifiers in the MAHA comments and the real goal as stated is to gain back trust and continue to increase vaccination rates. Makary even said in a CBS interview people have natural immunity, well then why take a shot anyway?! Then he went on to push non mRNA for those with problems with mRNA. What is the likelihood this fall they will miraculously have some approved shots based on “gold standard” clinical trials. Another qualifier they use is “healthy” children. So unhealthy children will have these pushed on them? Carefully chosen statements that leave a lot of options open.
IMA’s (formerly FLCCC) “Smart Moms” Campaign Scores Victory: HHS to Halt mRNA Vaccines for Kids, Pregnant Women:
https://imahealth.substack.com/p/imas-smart-moms-campaign-scores-victory
'There Is Overwhelming Evidence to Call for a Moratorium on the mRNA COVID Jabs': New MAHA Chief Medical Advisor
"And help the vaccine injured," says British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra:
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/there-is-overwhelming-evidence-to
EXCLUSIVE: The Top Medical Advisor To HHS Secerrty RFK Jr. Dr. Aseem Malhotra on Alex Jones' InfoWars last month:
(He himself is, regrettably, double-jabbed & his dad DIED SUDDENLY of cardiac arrest)
https://rumble.com/v6sahjv-exclusive-the-top-medical-advisor-to-hhs-secerrty-rfk-jr.-dr.-aseem-malhotr.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Yes. Not enough. IMO, deliberately. And I wonder how great someone who trustingly got the jab will/would feel if they continued to trust and get jabbed, and then boom! mRNA pulled. Like the soldiers still dying whilst peace talks are going on, I expect. Also wonder if all the folks who are okay with the microscopic steps would step up and get jabbed if, by some miracle of "testing", mRNA jabs are declared safe? would they rush down to CVS and get in line? Been wondering about that. Money where their mouth is, so to speak. Hey, get another booster! You'll be FINE!
Wheres all the Dads that lost children to this scourge? Thats what I wanna know. If it was my daughter they would have thought RAMBO just destroyed their world by the thousands. Every last one of them