This is why the CDC has NEVER used the Medicare data to prove the vaccines are safe. And this is why NOBODY in mainstream medicine wants you to see this data. EVER. They ALL want it hidden. FOREVER.
[...Forensic financial investigator Jacqueline Breger blew the lid off the hearing when she made several bombshell allegations during her testimony.
According to Breger, the recently installed governor, Democrat Katie Hobbs, and several other top Arizona officials have been working with Mexico’s deadly Sinaloa Cartel for years. ...] SEE MORE:
Game over? MSM wont cover this and its forgotten by next week. V-safe data, Israeli data scandal, excess mortality everywhere, birthrates plunging--No amount of data is going to convince the masses if the media ignores it.
A whistleblower from CMS (the insurance processor for Medicare and Medicaid claims) filed an affidavit in July 2021. She estimated that conservatively 45k were dead from the vaccine at that time. It's not hard to assume she filed the affidavit because she tried to report it internally and was shut down. Copy of affidavit: https://renz-law.com/whistleblower-45000-dead-from-covid-shot-not-11000/
I should add - I work with health insurance data. Every single major health insurance provider has this same kind of data on their members as CMS does on their members - CMS is just another health insurance company that's paid with government taxes instead of private funds. They ALL have the data that people are dying from the vax: Aetna, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Kaiser Permanente, United Health Care, Cigna, Humana, etc.. They all have the data and they all know. And no, HIPAA does not prevent insurance companies from making general statements about the vax. As long as the data isn't revealing personal or health information of identifiable individuals, it's not a violation of HIPAA.
More evidence Kirsch is either just being safe, or intentionally operating a limited hangout. Spartacus is quite meticulous, avoids the kookery, and names the names.
I look forward to reading your daily emails because, you do most certainly have your finger on the pulse. In addition, I do love the colorful language you use to describe the scumbag traitor fake prez whose initials are J. B.,
I agree with you about Kirsch, I think he's living in Never Never Land. He keeps thinking the CDC and Wollensky are going to return his phone calls. He'll be waiting a very long time for that one!
Dr Robert Malone now going into full controlled opposition mode, labeling those who question the existence of the virus or suspect a preplanned genocide operation as Jacobins—intolerant, radical revolutionaries: https://youtu.be/XYaLgeEBgaU?t=1036
Kirsch is not going to admit planned genocide, etc. because he is controlled opposition as well. He'll pull up the slack to frame the planned genocide as ignorance or government failure if Malone gets squeezed out. Kirsch attacked the people questioning the existence of the virus, employing ad hominem and other logical fallacies.
Remember both Kirsch and Malone are allegedly jabbed and pro-vax.
Ultimately, their narrative window is to acknowledge death, adverse events, etc. while keeping the explanation within the boundaries of ignorance, government failure, citizens being deceived and not confronting government leaders, moral failure by a few keep people who will be offered as patsies, and so on.
Administering of COVID-19 vaccination is likely not an indemnified action - this is notice of your obligations, rights, and potential risks.
On 2 July 2021 and 28 August 2021, the former Federal Government announced a proposed medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the COVID-19 vaccines. Recent correspondence from government advisers outlines that such an indemnity scheme was never established per se.
Unlike the case with manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines, there appears to be no government liability protection beyond the vaccine injury ‘COVID-19 vaccine claims scheme’.
Government and AHPRA correspondence outline practitioners’ obligations to obtain informed consent. AHPRA defines informed consent in section 4.5 of the Good Medical Practice Code of Conduct. It is “a person's voluntary decision about health care that is made with knowledge and understanding of the benefits and risks involved.”
The Australian Immunisation Handbook further states:
For consent to be legally valid...It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation...It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person."
The High court’s decision of Rogers v Whittaker 1992 sets today’s precedent and standard for informed consent obligations. A doctor has a duty to warn a patient of any material risk involved in a proposed treatment, or else risk tortious liability from patients.
The 9 March 2021 joint statement by AHPRA and National Boards threatens regulatory action “for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims, including on social media.” Regardless, evidence from reputable sources demonstrates that COVID-19 provisionally-approved vaccines have real known and unknown harms and immunocompromising effects. Doctors have a duty to warn patients of any material risks associated with the treatment as well as ensuring their decisions are being made without undue coercion.
We encourage you to be aware that under section 3.4.6 of the Good Medical Practice Code of Conduct, you have a right not to provide or directly participate in treatments to which you conscientiously object.
Sincerely,
Australian Medical Professionals’ Society
The Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) is a professional association whose principal purpose is to protect and promote the interests of members to ensure practitioners can practise medicine safely and effectively. AMPS advocates and acts to protect its member practitioners from reprisals for adherence to time-honoured codes, oaths, and ethics that ensure patients remain of primary concern. Amps.redunion.com.au.
The CDC, FDA, and Pharma are prosecutable under 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations. Operating in collusion they fully meet RICO Code criteria. I would add relevant MSM which also worked in collusion with those named above, enjoying federal money for misleading citizens to their deaths. The Code did not make exceptions for internal US operations, neither Cosa Nosa nor US Gov’t agencies, corporations, nor media when operating in collusion and meeting Code criteria.
While I am in complete agreement on the bioweapon aspect of the shots, your poll is most definitely skewed, since your readers, I'm sure, are the awakened of the awake.
And, as I commented before, the reasons for Steve's and others reticence to connect the final dots are not insignificant; action is always more dangerous than study:
"That’s the problem, isn’t it? Do we really need more data and analysis presented to show the bioweapon nature of the shots?
No, we don’t. The totality of the evidence is overwhelming.
But gathering more evidence is “safe”.
It’s the follow up course of actual action that is too frightening and absolutely fraught with danger that keeps those like Steve in the “investigation” stage.
“The future’s uncertain and the end is always near.”"
Substack authors are seeming to divide neatly into 2 camps at the moment:
The bioweapon/ evil cabal camp and the
Oops speed of science/ we got it a little bit wrong but we’ll fix it next time camp.
Glad to see that you are firmly on the right team!
*** WITNESS TESTIMONY DETAILS EXTENSIVE CORRUPTION
[...Forensic financial investigator Jacqueline Breger blew the lid off the hearing when she made several bombshell allegations during her testimony.
According to Breger, the recently installed governor, Democrat Katie Hobbs, and several other top Arizona officials have been working with Mexico’s deadly Sinaloa Cartel for years. ...] SEE MORE:
https://thelibertydaily.com/bombshell-expert-witness-reveals-installed-az-governor-katie-hobbs-laundered-cartel-money-through-fake-deeds-and-mortgages-to-rig-elections-including-her-own/
Game over? MSM wont cover this and its forgotten by next week. V-safe data, Israeli data scandal, excess mortality everywhere, birthrates plunging--No amount of data is going to convince the masses if the media ignores it.
A whistleblower from CMS (the insurance processor for Medicare and Medicaid claims) filed an affidavit in July 2021. She estimated that conservatively 45k were dead from the vaccine at that time. It's not hard to assume she filed the affidavit because she tried to report it internally and was shut down. Copy of affidavit: https://renz-law.com/whistleblower-45000-dead-from-covid-shot-not-11000/
I should add - I work with health insurance data. Every single major health insurance provider has this same kind of data on their members as CMS does on their members - CMS is just another health insurance company that's paid with government taxes instead of private funds. They ALL have the data that people are dying from the vax: Aetna, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Kaiser Permanente, United Health Care, Cigna, Humana, etc.. They all have the data and they all know. And no, HIPAA does not prevent insurance companies from making general statements about the vax. As long as the data isn't revealing personal or health information of identifiable individuals, it's not a violation of HIPAA.
Really good work by Spartacus summarizing what we found out about the Biodfefense Mafia last year
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WPMRNIJHpSun/
More evidence Kirsch is either just being safe, or intentionally operating a limited hangout. Spartacus is quite meticulous, avoids the kookery, and names the names.
Highly reccommended.
This explains why Mr Kirsch is a Globalist operative:
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/proton-magic-goes-virus-shopping
Here he admits that no-virus has been found:
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/steve-kirsch-substack-banned-me-for
Typos edited.
I look forward to reading your daily emails because, you do most certainly have your finger on the pulse. In addition, I do love the colorful language you use to describe the scumbag traitor fake prez whose initials are J. B.,
I agree with you about Kirsch, I think he's living in Never Never Land. He keeps thinking the CDC and Wollensky are going to return his phone calls. He'll be waiting a very long time for that one!
Spot on.
Dr Robert Malone now going into full controlled opposition mode, labeling those who question the existence of the virus or suspect a preplanned genocide operation as Jacobins—intolerant, radical revolutionaries: https://youtu.be/XYaLgeEBgaU?t=1036
Kirsch is not going to admit planned genocide, etc. because he is controlled opposition as well. He'll pull up the slack to frame the planned genocide as ignorance or government failure if Malone gets squeezed out. Kirsch attacked the people questioning the existence of the virus, employing ad hominem and other logical fallacies.
Remember both Kirsch and Malone are allegedly jabbed and pro-vax.
Ultimately, their narrative window is to acknowledge death, adverse events, etc. while keeping the explanation within the boundaries of ignorance, government failure, citizens being deceived and not confronting government leaders, moral failure by a few keep people who will be offered as patsies, and so on.
The blame game begins.
The bureaucrats duck and weaving now.
Guess who is going to be left without liability??
Australia
11 January 2023
Dear Medical Professional,
Administering of COVID-19 vaccination is likely not an indemnified action - this is notice of your obligations, rights, and potential risks.
On 2 July 2021 and 28 August 2021, the former Federal Government announced a proposed medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the COVID-19 vaccines. Recent correspondence from government advisers outlines that such an indemnity scheme was never established per se.
Unlike the case with manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines, there appears to be no government liability protection beyond the vaccine injury ‘COVID-19 vaccine claims scheme’.
Government and AHPRA correspondence outline practitioners’ obligations to obtain informed consent. AHPRA defines informed consent in section 4.5 of the Good Medical Practice Code of Conduct. It is “a person's voluntary decision about health care that is made with knowledge and understanding of the benefits and risks involved.”
The Australian Immunisation Handbook further states:
For consent to be legally valid...It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation...It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person."
The High court’s decision of Rogers v Whittaker 1992 sets today’s precedent and standard for informed consent obligations. A doctor has a duty to warn a patient of any material risk involved in a proposed treatment, or else risk tortious liability from patients.
The 9 March 2021 joint statement by AHPRA and National Boards threatens regulatory action “for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims, including on social media.” Regardless, evidence from reputable sources demonstrates that COVID-19 provisionally-approved vaccines have real known and unknown harms and immunocompromising effects. Doctors have a duty to warn patients of any material risks associated with the treatment as well as ensuring their decisions are being made without undue coercion.
We encourage you to be aware that under section 3.4.6 of the Good Medical Practice Code of Conduct, you have a right not to provide or directly participate in treatments to which you conscientiously object.
Sincerely,
Australian Medical Professionals’ Society
The Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) is a professional association whose principal purpose is to protect and promote the interests of members to ensure practitioners can practise medicine safely and effectively. AMPS advocates and acts to protect its member practitioners from reprisals for adherence to time-honoured codes, oaths, and ethics that ensure patients remain of primary concern. Amps.redunion.com.au.
https://amps.redunion.com.au/important-covid-19-vaccine-indemnity
It would be 'game over' if not for the fact Steve Kirsch isn't allowed to play.
The CDC, FDA, and Pharma are prosecutable under 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96 - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations. Operating in collusion they fully meet RICO Code criteria. I would add relevant MSM which also worked in collusion with those named above, enjoying federal money for misleading citizens to their deaths. The Code did not make exceptions for internal US operations, neither Cosa Nosa nor US Gov’t agencies, corporations, nor media when operating in collusion and meeting Code criteria.
While I am in complete agreement on the bioweapon aspect of the shots, your poll is most definitely skewed, since your readers, I'm sure, are the awakened of the awake.
And, as I commented before, the reasons for Steve's and others reticence to connect the final dots are not insignificant; action is always more dangerous than study:
"That’s the problem, isn’t it? Do we really need more data and analysis presented to show the bioweapon nature of the shots?
No, we don’t. The totality of the evidence is overwhelming.
But gathering more evidence is “safe”.
It’s the follow up course of actual action that is too frightening and absolutely fraught with danger that keeps those like Steve in the “investigation” stage.
“The future’s uncertain and the end is always near.”"
Excellent information! I think most of us know this IS happening. What really struck me was: WHERE IS COMMIFORNIA????
And the Steve Kirsch “police contact” was hilarious! Did that kid pass his FTO? 😂
I created an interactive dashboard of Kirsch's data here: https://www.vaersaware.com/kirsch-medicare-vax-deaths