This substack has exposed the so called fertility issues with IVM as a sham as has Dr Makis on his own substack. This sham was promoted by none other than Dr. Yeadon.
This substack has exposed the so called fertility issues with IVM as a sham as has Dr Makis on his own substack. This sham was promoted by none other than Dr. Yeadon.
"I’d like to know why the people that want to sterilise the third world - a given - are suddenly so altruistic as to provide bucket loads of IVM for free to these countries to save them from river blindness and more." Unless you live on another planet these same people did everything they could to suppress this compound and still do. "Funnily enough studies have shown that IVM can particularly attack vision" Which studies are those , the same one's as the obviously fake antihcq articles that were retracted from Lancet? You know Mehra et al https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32450107/ or perhaps a study by this author
"Many alternative truthers pushing this are obviously well funded and extremely prolific, maintaining a presence that the likes of truly persecuted people like Dr Mike Yeadon cannot. " What does that have to do with the price of rice? The fact is he publicized studies that have been debunked as a pile of bullshit just like Mehra et al. "Amazing cure all drug this IVM. Is this to catch the people who they knew would never take the jab? Plan B? I think quite possibly. I also have reservations about sites that are more interested in selling these products to us…" "I think quite possibly" Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one,."I also have reservations about sites that are more interested in selling these products to us…" The first site to promote IVM FBZ as a protocol for late stage cancer patients that has had unheard of success, subsequently promoted by Dr. Makis , Dr Marick et al with similar success. Please go away
Adhominem?? where did I attack you personally?. Lets unpack my response, data talks, bullshit walks,
You claim IVM causes fertility issues and blindness, citing “studies.” The 2011 Nigerian study (37 men, no control) linked IVM to sperm reduction, but experts say onchocerciasis, not IVM, was the cause—flawed data No human infertility is proven
On blindness, IVM treats river blindness, preventing it—millions saved via free programs ). Mazzotti reactions (itching) aren’t vision loss. Your “altruism” twist ignores suppression—Mehra’s retracted Lancet study (2020) delayed HCQ and later IVM, not pushed it.
Cancer success here and with (Makis, 2025) is real, not a “Plan B”—grassroots, not funded.
IVM/FBZ enhance trained immunity via gut health (Bifidobacterium, Hazan, 2022), target Warburg safely—separate from vaccine debates. Questioning is fine, but data matters.
This substack has exposed the so called fertility issues with IVM as a sham as has Dr Makis on his own substack. This sham was promoted by none other than Dr. Yeadon.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/ivermectin-is-under-attack-again?utm_source=publication-search
"I’d like to know why the people that want to sterilise the third world - a given - are suddenly so altruistic as to provide bucket loads of IVM for free to these countries to save them from river blindness and more." Unless you live on another planet these same people did everything they could to suppress this compound and still do. "Funnily enough studies have shown that IVM can particularly attack vision" Which studies are those , the same one's as the obviously fake antihcq articles that were retracted from Lancet? You know Mehra et al https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32450107/ or perhaps a study by this author
https://x.com/catsscareme2021/status/1899964838345941466
"Many alternative truthers pushing this are obviously well funded and extremely prolific, maintaining a presence that the likes of truly persecuted people like Dr Mike Yeadon cannot. " What does that have to do with the price of rice? The fact is he publicized studies that have been debunked as a pile of bullshit just like Mehra et al. "Amazing cure all drug this IVM. Is this to catch the people who they knew would never take the jab? Plan B? I think quite possibly. I also have reservations about sites that are more interested in selling these products to us…" "I think quite possibly" Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one,."I also have reservations about sites that are more interested in selling these products to us…" The first site to promote IVM FBZ as a protocol for late stage cancer patients that has had unheard of success, subsequently promoted by Dr. Makis , Dr Marick et al with similar success. Please go away
Adhominem?? where did I attack you personally?. Lets unpack my response, data talks, bullshit walks,
You claim IVM causes fertility issues and blindness, citing “studies.” The 2011 Nigerian study (37 men, no control) linked IVM to sperm reduction, but experts say onchocerciasis, not IVM, was the cause—flawed data No human infertility is proven
On blindness, IVM treats river blindness, preventing it—millions saved via free programs ). Mazzotti reactions (itching) aren’t vision loss. Your “altruism” twist ignores suppression—Mehra’s retracted Lancet study (2020) delayed HCQ and later IVM, not pushed it.
Cancer success here and with (Makis, 2025) is real, not a “Plan B”—grassroots, not funded.
IVM/FBZ enhance trained immunity via gut health (Bifidobacterium, Hazan, 2022), target Warburg safely—separate from vaccine debates. Questioning is fine, but data matters.
Why cancel, you, better to expose you!