The article cites several examples. I have watched. Dr. David Nixon in Australia showing similar results. How do you explain this? Hence my question is this something you expect to see normally?
Of course everything warrants further investigation! And good for David investigating it. My comment was do not spread bullshit clickbait headlines which are known to be false.
I would agree that the document Karen attributed as evidence is incorrect. While there is SIGNIFICANT evidence of graphene oxide in the vials from a number of researchers, the Pfizer Groton Laboratory report does not provide any such evidence that happened to use GO for its supporting layers that the sample is on to improve the imagery when scanning samples.
In the current article the analysis published by the Argentinian health authorities indeed supports the presence of GO in the vials and another poster here showed this heavily referenced paper on the effect GO has on blood that certainly is supported by the real world work of Dr.David Nixon.
Certainly an update to this article is warranted to correct the headline but also present even MORE evidence than was published here of the presence of GO.
Attacking Karen Kingston over her misunderstanding of technical reports and using it as a rationale for the disgusting demonization of the legitimate evidence of the presence of GO is precisely what the perpetrators of these crimes want people like your good self to do.
I don't know which Dr. Malone post you mean, I rarely read his posts. I don't read Karen's because she lies too much. Which "Argentinian authorities"? If you mean La Quinta - I have seen their reports and they do not have direct evidence. Nobody does to my knowledge. Circumstantial evidence exists, but to provide direct evidence 1)you need properly equipped lab - all of these labs are under NIH/DOD thumb and contracts 2) you need people with expertise in this - Karen or LaQuinta or David Nixon or Ana M do not have that expertise. Few people on the planet do, and they are also all on the DOD payroll.
"ArgentinaтАЩs Dr Patricia Aprea, Director of Evaluation and Control of the ANMAT, also accidentally admitted AstraZenecaтАЩs Viral Vector Covid-19 injection also contains Graphene during a legal case regarding a death post-Covid injection.
My mistake re Dr. Malone, it was actually Dr. Cole who I know and respect very much but again he overreacted to Karen Kingson's misinterpretation to the Pfizer Grotin report.
I tried to translate the Argentinian report - it does not read like any confirmation, only denial. My comment was only in regard to the Pfizer report that KK posted as clickbait and everyone has been recycling like morons without reading it. This discredits every single account that picked it up and ran with it.
The translation of the argentinian reports that shows GO is in the article above. KK post was indeed badly done but this article is not simply a repost of her and does cite other evidence that should be considered, something KK's article did not do. Someone in her comments explained that the FDA report has nothing to do with graphene in vaccine production and she did not even reply to it that is not a good look at all.
If you cite several articles that confirm something and one false item claiming it confirms something - you just discredited yourself forever. That's what I was pointing out. Arg. document does not confirm GO, it's a discussion-gov denial document. There must be test results from labs that have equipment and experience dealing with GO. Hint - it's not a guy with a microscope (David Nixon, much as I love him).
Seen by one person in a few patients (so not healthy people) in her practice and extrapolated to the entire world?
The article cites several examples. I have watched. Dr. David Nixon in Australia showing similar results. How do you explain this? Hence my question is this something you expect to see normally?
David does standard optical microscopy. So does Ana. Optical microscopy cannot detect GO.
Forget about GO, is it normal to see the structures David et al showed.? If no , then it warrants further investigation.
Of course everything warrants further investigation! And good for David investigating it. My comment was do not spread bullshit clickbait headlines which are known to be false.
I would agree that the document Karen attributed as evidence is incorrect. While there is SIGNIFICANT evidence of graphene oxide in the vials from a number of researchers, the Pfizer Groton Laboratory report does not provide any such evidence that happened to use GO for its supporting layers that the sample is on to improve the imagery when scanning samples.
In the current article the analysis published by the Argentinian health authorities indeed supports the presence of GO in the vials and another poster here showed this heavily referenced paper on the effect GO has on blood that certainly is supported by the real world work of Dr.David Nixon.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328338305_Graphene_Oxide_Touches_Blood_In_Vivo_Interactions_of_Bio-Coronated_2D_Materials
https://rumble.com/v1o8wsy-discussion-with-dr.-david-nixon-regarding-microscopy-findings-in-mrnadna-in.html
Certainly an update to this article is warranted to correct the headline but also present even MORE evidence than was published here of the presence of GO.
Attacking Karen Kingston over her misunderstanding of technical reports and using it as a rationale for the disgusting demonization of the legitimate evidence of the presence of GO is precisely what the perpetrators of these crimes want people like your good self to do.
I don't know which Dr. Malone post you mean, I rarely read his posts. I don't read Karen's because she lies too much. Which "Argentinian authorities"? If you mean La Quinta - I have seen their reports and they do not have direct evidence. Nobody does to my knowledge. Circumstantial evidence exists, but to provide direct evidence 1)you need properly equipped lab - all of these labs are under NIH/DOD thumb and contracts 2) you need people with expertise in this - Karen or LaQuinta or David Nixon or Ana M do not have that expertise. Few people on the planet do, and they are also all on the DOD payroll.
It is referenced in the article above.
"ArgentinaтАЩs Dr Patricia Aprea, Director of Evaluation and Control of the ANMAT, also accidentally admitted AstraZenecaтАЩs Viral Vector Covid-19 injection also contains Graphene during a legal case regarding a death post-Covid injection.
You can read the document where ANMAT recognised that Covid-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide HERE in https://ejercitoremanente.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/1_5125102865643209189.pdf (Spanish) or below, translated into English using Google "тАУ
My mistake re Dr. Malone, it was actually Dr. Cole who I know and respect very much but again he overreacted to Karen Kingson's misinterpretation to the Pfizer Grotin report.
I tried to translate the Argentinian report - it does not read like any confirmation, only denial. My comment was only in regard to the Pfizer report that KK posted as clickbait and everyone has been recycling like morons without reading it. This discredits every single account that picked it up and ran with it.
The translation of the argentinian reports that shows GO is in the article above. KK post was indeed badly done but this article is not simply a repost of her and does cite other evidence that should be considered, something KK's article did not do. Someone in her comments explained that the FDA report has nothing to do with graphene in vaccine production and she did not even reply to it that is not a good look at all.
If you cite several articles that confirm something and one false item claiming it confirms something - you just discredited yourself forever. That's what I was pointing out. Arg. document does not confirm GO, it's a discussion-gov denial document. There must be test results from labs that have equipment and experience dealing with GO. Hint - it's not a guy with a microscope (David Nixon, much as I love him).