3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
charles's avatar

1) DeathVax Morbidity and mortality is dose dependent;

2) The plan was for everybody to have more doses than they have now: 2 initial and then boosters at least every 6 months;

3) Deagel, a mysterious website that has been cited as an authority in official government publications, years ago predicted a 78% population die off by 2025.

When the Deathvax rolled out I suspected that the people dying immediately from the clots were a mistake, the the real die-off was to come from suppression of the immune system. Some people way smarter than me (e.g., neuroscientist Kevin McCairn) think that the big impact will be down the road in neurologic damage from systemic amyloidosis.

But as a result of those sentinel clot deaths, some people became hesitant and refused; others are refusing now.

The cull is likely not proceeding as well as intended.

But the DeathCult is not going to give up, they will only double down to get more jabs in. They need more people injected soon before these longterm deaths become evident even to the dimmest television watcher.

Thank you for being brave enough to see the reality that is in front of us but is too scary for most people to accept.

Expand full comment
2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

The Deagel article you are referring to has been debunked long ago. Corbett did excellent expose on this.

Expand full comment
charles's avatar

Thank you, good to hear.

But one thing I want to add: it is my admittedly imperfect understanding that Deagel published alarming numbers. And then people noticed the numbers. Then Deagel published an article explaining the numbers.

That article, the one explaining the numbers, struck me as pure propaganda. It said that Covid proves that the West is incapable of handling a real crisis. It read like an argument for more government control, the last thing we need.

I will check out Corbett, thanks for the tip.

Expand full comment
ErrorError