13 Comments
User's avatar
Deborah's avatar

It's a big club and I am NOT in it! :) God help us...

Kalle Pihlajasaari's avatar

Amen to that.

That Carlson skit at the press club years ago has always made me think.

Was it a mainstream media pep talk, ego trip flex or a globalist team loyalty pledge?

We know it was not a warning because the Epstein class does not have to warn us.

The SNL skit with Woodrow Harrelson has a similar flavour.

Trying to find trustworthy/un-corrupted Hollywood and entertainment types is HARD.

Perhaps some who were pushed out of Hollywood might be un-corrupted.

Sheila England's avatar

They ALWAYS tell you who they are.

Kalle Pihlajasaari's avatar

I have a theory why they warn the sheep but am curious why you think they identify themselves.

My suspicion is that somewhere in their cult prehistory an acolyte asked the high priest "Will we not suffer negative karma if we do evil to the sheep?" and the high priest replied, hiding his falsehood, "If we warn the sheep before we slaughter them then they go willingly to their slaughter and we are absolved." and so doing lied to all his followers and gave them a false moral exit clause for any evil they perpetrated thinking there was no karmic debt attached which will come due. That is the only reason I can see why they would BOTHER to warn us, some form of self interest and there are very few benefits they can gain by exposing themselves.

Another potential reason might be that speaking openly about it might make them vulnerable and motivate them to hold the line "till death" as they have associated with the doings of the inner circle. Again the only reason for increasing your risk would be cult like behaviour, counter productive in my view as any exposure could become credible or go viral and cause unstoppable harm to the cults secrecy.

John Roberts's avatar

The hits just keep on coming and there seems to be no off switch on the jukebox !!!

Ross Boulton's avatar

Wrote a short fiction on exactly this β€” the careful man who arranged to be present at everything and responsible for nothing. No names. The box does the work; the reader supplies the man.

https://rossboulton1.substack.com/p/i-signed-the-book?utm_source=app-post-stats-page&r=2leuaj&utm_medium=ios

Curmudgeon's avatar

I have said from the beginning of the Epstein saga that the truth will never come out. I say that for a number of reasons:

- "FBI files" are meaningless, unless they have actual proof, not statements/allegations of criminal activity;

- Trafficking means moving from on place to another. The "girls" lived in a building close to Epstein's residence in which there was no security preventing them to leave, according to Lady Victoria Herve, who was put up for one night, by Ghislaine Maxwell after consulting Epstein. If the "girls" went to Epstein's residence to engage in illegal activity, or vice versa, that is trafficking.

- As I have posted previously, young teenage girls knowingly and willingly engage in prostitution. I know this as my daughters had girls in their high school classes engaged in it. That was in the mid 1980s. Not all of these girls are "victims" in the normal sense of the word. The fact that they are alive, many with careers, and not known to be addicts as the case with most pimped prostitutes, is evidence of that.

- There was a release of e-mail exchanges, early on, between Epstein and Andrew, in which Andrew was asking for help against the Roberts/Giuffre allegations. Epstein stated she was a serial liar and it was easily proven. If the statement is true, it calls into question the validity of all of the Roberts/Giuffre allegations/statements, and the rest of the "victims" supporting her. At the same time it validates the likelihood of truth in the rest of the personal e-mails. If Epstein's statement about her is a lie, then what else in his emails is a lie?

- After working in HR/Employee relations in a unionized environment for 30+ years, I learned everybody is lying when they tell their story. That can be by commission or omission. The story is always presented in the manner to put the storyteller in the best light, even when under oath. The "old guys", who mentored me almost 50 years ago, made sure I understood that.

None of the above means Epstein isn't guilty. The questions are of what and how much of has gone on was, not only known, but, supported by government(s). The truth cannot be allowed to come out, because it may expose other operations being run for nefarious purposes. Right Mr. Gates?

Philip Joseph's avatar

Quite the monumental task you have taken on to gather the Everest of damning evidence of the horrors committed by these demons and to attempt the almost impossible task of putting it together, making any sense of it all and bringing the guilty to justice. I don’t know if it is possible in our lifetimes, this perverse amoral behaviour must have been occurring since we came out of the trees, perhaps earlier. A lot more of the demons here now with much more effective means. I don’t have any doubt about the perversion, cruelty and murderous behaviour as the demons seem to almost be admitting to it as if Satan had already won. I do believe it is one ship too far to drag everyone into the evil, globalist, transhumanoid plans for submissive humanity. The evidence for any Trump and family involvement, intentional, coerced or unawares is slim to none. It defies any reason the demon cabal would keep trying to murder an insider number one agent. That angle only serves to drag down credibility of the rest of the story. Another thought, there is no chance the β€œ family” did not know of evil perv Andy’s evil deeds. Why was he the Queen’s favourite?

Sheila England's avatar

Because she and Prince Philip were evil too! They are reptilian. Diana found out about it.