108 Comments

Democide doesn't get resolved with non violent justice. Trials first. Then hangings (or remdesivir drips for weeks until kidney failure) are the minimum these war criminals deserve.

The Unforgiven:

https://thegoodcitizen.substack.com/p/the-unforgiven

Expand full comment

The only good thing that came from her amnesty post is AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THE POWER HAS SHIFTED. IT'S MOVING FAST NOW. HOLD ON.

Expand full comment
Nov 1, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

Am I the only one that read the article? Near the end of it she talks about how we need more government involvement and vaccine mandates. No amnesty of any kind is due.

Expand full comment
Nov 1, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

Bill Gates KNEW from the very outset that these jabs alter human dna and are irreversible.

Anthony Fauci KNEW from the beginning that these jabs killed all of the cats, killed all of the ferrets, and killed all of the mice before they had a chance to reproduce.

This pathetic request is a thinly veiled attempt to save herself from being rounded up as a covid criminal of which there are many.

The unfortunate people who have been coerced, bullied, hated, vilified, sacked, and mandated into taking these dna altering jabs have no chance of ever going back.

That includes the children too.

Expand full comment

I posted this on another substack (Dr Paul Alexander) that commented on the same amnesty plea by the liberal quislings....

Bravo! It has gone way past amnesty. Justice must be served to fit the enormity of this crime. But, some individuals are more culpable than others, so perhaps those at the bottom of the food chain “could” be offered some kind of amnesty if they provide irrefutable evidence of who authored their directives.

The reason for this is that IMHO the actions of the door watcher insisting on a mask before entry to a venue cannot be compared to the monstrous evil and criminality perpetrated on humanity by the likes Fauci, Bourla, Gates et al. Having said that, any person who has had any part to play must be held accountable for their actions. As we all know, “I was just following orders,” is no defence. These people must know what they did was wrong and publicly accept their culpability and suitable punishment.

Anyway, this is how I feel about anyone who has in ANY way contributed to these crimes against humanity. No blanket amnesty, but justice according to their part played. This will be painstaking and require Herculean effort on the part of lawmakers, but it must be done as quickly as possible so that we can pick up from the shards of what's left. We must never forget this diabolical chapter of human history, but instead record it for posterity so that no one EVER forgets.

Expand full comment

Never forget treason, never forget cowardice and procrastination. They are the slimy, ruthless and selfish souls.

Happened many times before when the real characters had to be displayed.

The oppressors always play dumb and deceived when their time runs out:” I didn’t know, I was just following the orders”. Have we heard it somewhere before?

Forgive them and they will stab the knife in your back at the earliest favorable opportunity for them. Skunks!

Expand full comment
Nov 1, 2022·edited Nov 1, 2022

Don't you love the way the word "we" us used? As in "we" need to forgive them cause they know what's coming. Justice is needed for those who were pushed, prodded, cajoled, lied to, in order to put that needle into resistant arms. Justice for those who were muzzled, cancelled, masked, shunned, forced to choose between their job and being injected with an experimental gene therapy. Justice is needed for the injured and the families of same, especially those who watched family and friends die as a result of being injected. Justice is needed for those that blindly did as told, people credentialed to diagnose disease and who took an oath to do no harm but did the exact opposite. People who believed the lies, believed the narrative pushed by government, big pharma, media and the technocracy and turned a blind eye and deaf ear to others who cautioned against widespread use of an experimental gene therapy during a pandemic.

Doctors, nurses, clinical assistants, administrators, pharmacists, insurance companies, employers, clergy, school boards, teachers unions, government agencies, social media, advertisers, on and on and on. Those that added to the 24x7x365 drumbeat to get vaccinated, get boosted, don't ask questions, don't complain, just comply, comply, comply. There needs to be a complete housecleaning of everyone involved and in positions of authority. These people cannot be trusted, cannot be allowed to instruct, advise, control, anyone ever again. This extends to the medical credentialing and licensing boards, who followed big pharma and governmental pronouncements without question.

The ONLY doctors that should be permitted to direct how medicine should be practiced from this point forward are those that resisted the edicts. Those that stood up and said NO. I WILL NOT COMPLY with this craziness. they are the ones who refused to do harm and were loyal to both patients and their Hippocratic Oath. They put their reputations, their livelihoods, their years of study and medical practices on the line.

Amnesty will not and should not be considered, not for one second.

Expand full comment

I was hoping to get your take on this. You did not disappoint! Well done. No words really, except thinking it's a bit like after discovering the extent of the horrors of the Holocaust and suggesting "Meh, Let's move one." She is entirely ignorant of the horrors that occurred during the past couple of years, and because of the vaxx, those injuries will continue indefinitely. Maybe instead of amnesty, she could just catch up a bit on what happened while she restricted her information to the MSM news. She still is unaware this was a scamdemic with a much larger agenda. Thanks for your work!

Expand full comment

I love how she announces “Prof.” Which means: I’am all knowing, you must listen to me! These “people” disgusting in every way! The arrogance to tell others how to live without making the slightest effort to have any clue what you’re talking about. Piled high and deeper, I guess?

Expand full comment
Nov 2, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

My takeaway from her article is now they know that they were wrong and that we were right all along. It's kind of a big deal that this is being stated now - a sort of paradigm shift in their mentality. The fact that the Atlantic is actually publishing this is significant. They are publicly admitting being wrong. (And I use "they" for the sheep collectively because nearly all of them operate via groupthink. Oster is just one of the lead sheep stating these things - the rest will soon follow.)

My other significant takeaway is that they feel the need to ask for forgiveness/amnesty. Of course, it is couched in the article that both sides need to forgive each other in order to minimize their negative feelings about their actions and thoughts. Why would they need to ask for amnesty and forgiveness on such a public level? They sense something very bad is coming in the very near future. They have realized the hell that has been unleashed, the millions dropping dead, the violations of human rights of which they have participated. I believe this realization is only subliminal right now and that is why this article was written and published.

The tsunami is coming.

Expand full comment

At the end of every science article related to COVID, especially, you read this "The Atlantic’s COVID-19 coverage is supported by grants from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation."

Chan Zuckerberg is Mark Zuckerberg's wife and obviously tied to Facebook which is not a medical authority. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is connected to the J&J vaccine...conflict of interest?? https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/coll... This organization is also funding vaccine projects......We also received $46,369 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in this quarter. SciCheck’s COVID-19/Vaccination Project is made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. https://www.factcheck.org/our-funding/

Expand full comment

No. Gtfo Emily.

Expand full comment

I must admit I’m frustrated by a lot of these comments. People are speaking in terms as if this fight is over. That we’ve won the war. My guess is the monsters on the other side are saying everything is going as planned. We are at the very beginning of the 10 year genocidal war. There is nobody truly fighting for us in governments across the globe with the exception of Africa. The unlimited money they have created all this mess. Satashi Nakamoto is fictitious.bitcoin was created to allow for digital identites. The plans for CBDC’s is well underway. I don’t see how we make any of these psychopaths pay for anything. They’ve been concocting these plans for 60 plus years. I don’t see Nuremberg 2.0 happening. Who will enforce it?

Expand full comment

It's quite amazing how so many of the masses think that were not a part of this. Oh yes they were for saying nothing, and just bending over.

Expand full comment

I think she and many others in (formerly) trusted institutions are in a tough spot right now. Her essay is a cry for amnesty in an attempt to regain lost trust. I think it is a fair perspective between common people, because many were insulated from good information, and it’s fair to say they didn’t know. But even they need to recognize that they gave in to hysteria and abandoned common sense. Wisdom comes (in part) from learning from mistakes.

I don’t, however, have the same view re people who are in positions of responsibility and are by virtue of those positions stewards of public trust. All doctors, CDC, governors, departments of health, presidents, media talking heads, and many who used their positions of influence to advocate for harmful policies and/or failed to speak out against them violated the public trust, and for that there must be a reckoning that accords with the level of trust. In some cases, a “sorry, my bad” might be enough, but for most in the public trust, that won’t do.

Expand full comment